Skip to main content
Log in

Modeling the consequence of increased host tolerance toward avian brood parasitism

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Population Ecology

Abstract

Avian brood parasites greatly reduce the reproductive success of their hosts. Empirical studies have demonstrated that some hosts have evolved defenses against parasitism like an ability to recognize and reject parasitic eggs that are dissimilar to their own eggs. Detailed mechanisms of how hosts recognize parasitism still remain unknown, but recent studies have shown that the host’s recognition, in many cases, is based on discordance of the eggs in a clutch, and that hosts are more error-prone when the nest is multiply parasitized, i.e., hosts tend to accept more multiple parasitism than single parasitism. In an area in Hungary, the great reed warbler Acrocephalus arundinaceus, one of the main hosts of the common cuckoo Cuculus canorus, is heavily parasitized and the parasitism rate has been kept at quite a high level for decades. Previous mathematical models suggest that such a high parasitism rate can be maintained because the focal host population behaves as a sink where few hosts can reproduce but immigration from outside replenishes the loss of host reproduction in the sink population. Here, we explore the consequences of the increased host tolerance towards multiple parasitism which has been overlooked in the previous studies using a simple model. Our model analysis shows that the increased host tolerance can dramatically contribute to both the parasite abundance and the parasitism rate being kept at a high level. We suggest that such a host behavior, combined with host immigration, can be an important factor responsible for the observed severe parasitism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Avilés JM, Stokke BG, Moksnes A, Røskaft E, Åsmul M, Møller AP (2006) Rapid increase in cuckoo egg matching in a recently parasitized reed warbler population. J Evol Biol 19:1901–1910

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barabás L, Gilicze B, Takasu F, Moskát C (2004) Survival and anti-parasite defense in a host metapopulation under heavy brood parasitism: a source-sink dynamic model. J Ethol 22:143–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cherry MI, Bennett ATD, Moskát C (2007) Do cuckoos choose nests of great reed warblers on the basis of host egg appearance? J Evol Biol 20:1218–1222

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Davies NB (2000) Cuckoos, cowbirds and other cheats. Poyser, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies NB, Brooke M de L (1988) Cuckoos versus reed warblers: adaptations and counteradaptations. Anim Behav 36:262–284

  • Davies NB, Brooke M de L (1989a) An experimental study of co-evolution between the cuckoo, Cuculus canorus, and its hosts. I. Host egg discrimination. J Anim Ecol 58:207–224

  • Davies NB, Brooke M de L (1989b) An experimental study of co-evolution between the cuckoo, Cuculus canorus, and its hosts. II. Host egg markings, chick discrimination and general discussion. J Anim Ecol 58:225–236

  • Dawkins R, Krebs JR (1979) Arms races between and within species. Proc R Soc Lond B 205:489–511

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Getz WM, Mills NJ (1996) Host-parasitoid coexistence and egg-limited encounter rates. Am Nat 148:301–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleven O, Moksnes A, Røskaft E, Rudolfsen G, Stokke BG, Honza M (2004) Breeding success of common cuckoos Cuculus canorus parasitising four sympatric species of Acrocephalus warblers. J Avian Biol 35:394–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krüger O (2007) Cuckoos, cowbirds and hosts: adaptations, trade-offs and constraints. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 362:1873–1886

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langmore NE, Kilner RM (2009) Why do Horsfield’s bronze-cuckoo Chalcites basalis eggs mimic those of their hosts? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 63:1127–1131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lotem A, Nakamura H, Zahavi A (1995) Constrains on egg discrimination and cuckoo-host co-evolution. Anim Behav 49:1185–1209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovászi P, Moskát C (2004) Break-down of arms race between the red-backed shrike (Lanius collurio) and common cuckoo (Cuculus canorus). Behaviour 141:245–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marchetti K (1992) Costs to host defence and the persistence of parasitic cuckoos. Proc R Soc Lond B 248:41–45

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moksnes A, Røskaft E (1995) Egg-morphs and host preference in the common cuckoo (Cuculus canorus): an analysis of cuckoo and host eggs from European museum collections. J Zool 236:625–648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moksnes A, Røskaft E, Bičík V, Honza M, Øien IJ (1993) Cuckoo Cuculus canorus parasitism on Acrocephalus warblers in southern Moravia in the Czech Republic. J Ornithol 134:425–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moskát C, Honza M (2002) European cuckoo Cuculus canorus parasitism and host’s rejection behaviour in a heavily parasitized great reed warbler Acrocephalus arundinaceus population. Ibis 144:614–622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moskát C, Hauber ME, Avilés JM, Bán M, Hargitai R, Honza M (2009) Increased host tolerance of multiple cuckoo eggs leads to higher fledging success of the brood parasite. Anim Behav 77:1281–1290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray JD (2007) Mathematical biology: I. An introduction, 3rd edn. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura H, Kubota S, Suzuki R (1998) Coevolution between the common cuckoo and its major hosts in Japan. In: Rothstein SI, Robinson SK (eds) Parasitic birds and their hosts. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 94–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson AJ, Bailey VA (1935) The balance of animal populations. Proc Zool Soc Lond 3:551–598

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein SI (1990) A model system for coevolution: avian brood parasitism. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 21:481–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Røskaft E, Takasu F, Moksnes A, Stokke BG (2006) Importance of spatial habitat structure on establishment of host defenses against brood parasitism. Behav Ecol 17:700–708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephens PA, Sutherland WJ, Freckleton RP (1999) What is the Allee effect? Oikos 87:185–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stokke BG, Honza M, Moksnes A, Røskaft E, Rudolfsen G (2002) Costs associated with recognition and rejection of parasitic eggs in two European passerines. Behaviour 139:629–644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takasu F (1998) Modelling the arms race in avian brood parasitism. Evol Ecol 12:969–987

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takasu F (2005) A theoretical consideration on co-evolutionary interactions between avian brood parasites and their hosts. Ornithol Sci 4:65–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takasu F, Moskát C, Muñoz AR, Imanishi S, Nakamura H (2009) Adaptations in the common cuckoo (Cuculus canorus) to host eggs in a multiple-hosts system of brood parasitism. Biol J Linn Soc 98:291–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson WR (1929) On the effect of random oviposition on the action of entomophagous parasites as agents of natural control. Parasitology 21:180–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vikan JR, Stokke BG, Fossøy F, Jackson C, Huhta E, Rutila J, Moksnes A, Røskaft E (2009) Fixed rejection responses to single and multiple experimental parasitism in two Fringilla hosts of the common cuckoo. Ethology 115:840–850

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wyllie I (1981) The cuckoo. Batsford, London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Michael de L. Brooke for his advice and Bård G. Stokke for discussion and comments to improve an earlier draft. We also thank two anonymous reviewers for constructive suggestions and criticism of the earlier manuscript. This study was supported in part by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research 20570021 to F.T. and by the Hungarian Science Fund (No. 48397) to C.M.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fugo Takasu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Takasu, F., Moskát, C. Modeling the consequence of increased host tolerance toward avian brood parasitism. Popul Ecol 53, 187–193 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10144-010-0221-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10144-010-0221-x

Keywords

Navigation