Abstract
Individuals frequently behave in a consistent manner across time or in different situations. We examined the repeatability of duration of death-feigning anti-predator behaviour when attacked, and then carried out artificial selection for duration to calculate its heritability and examine correlated responses to selection in activity levels, in the confused flour beetle, Tribolium confusum. Three replicates of two strains were established by artificial selection for more than 17 generations: S strains exhibited shorter duration and lower frequency of death feigning while L strains exhibited longer duration and higher frequency of death feigning. Duration of death feigning clearly responded to selection, and significant value of realized heritability was detected in all replicates of the two strains. Examination of locomotor activity levels over a constant period showed that S strains had higher locomotor activity levels than L strains. No significant differences between the sexes were observed. Our study thus demonstrates heritability of death feigning and the existence of a negative genetic correlation between intensity of death feigning and activity level.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bell AM (2005) Behavioural differences between individuals and two populations of stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus). J Evol Biol 18:464–473. doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2004.00817.x
Bell AM (2007) Future directions in behavioural syndromes research. Proc R Soc B 274:755–761. doi:10.1098/rspb.2006.0199
Boake CRB (1989) Repeatability: its role in evolutionary studies of mating behavior. Evol Ecol 3:173–182. doi:10.1007/BF02270919
Boake CRB (1994) Quantitative genetic studies of behavioral evolution. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Buss DM (1991) Evolutionary personality psychology. Annu Rev Psychol 42:459–491. doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.42.020191.002331
Cassill DL, Vo K, Becker B (2008) Young fire ant workers feign death and survive aggressive neighbors. Naturwissenschaften 7:617–624. doi:10.1007/s00114-008-0362-3
Edmunds M (1974) Defense in animals: a survey of anti-predator defenses. Longman, Harlow
Erhard HW, Mendl M (1999) Tonic immobility and emergence time in pigs: more evidence for behavioural strategies. Appl Anim Behav Sci 61:227–237. doi:10.1016/S0168-1591(99)00028-3
Fabre JH (1900) Souvenirs entomologiques, 7ème Série (in French). Delgrave, Paris
Francq EN (1969) Behavioural aspects of feigned death in the opossum Didelphis marsupialis. Am Midl Nat 81:556–567
Frost SW (1959) Insect life and insect natural history. Dover, New York
Gehlbach FR (1970) Death-feigning and erratic behaviour in leptotyphlopid, colubrid, and elapid snakes. Herpetologica 26:24–34
Gosling SD (2001) From mice to men: what can we learn about personality from animal research? Psychol Bull 127:45–86
Hansen SL, González FS, Toft S, Bilde T (2008) Thanatosis as an adaptive male mating strategy in the nuptial gift-giving spider Pisaura mirabilis. Behav Ecol 19:546–551. doi:10.1093/beheco/arm165
Honma A, Oku S, Nishida T (2006) Adaptive significance of death feigning posture as a specialized inducible defence against gape-limited predators. Proc R Soc B 73:1631–1636. doi:10.1098/rspb.2006.3501
King BH, Leaich HR (2006) Variation in propensity to exhibit thanatosis in Nasonia vitripennis (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae). J Insect Behav 19:241–249. doi:10.1007/s10905-006-9022-7
Kume K, Kume S, Park SK, Hirsh J, Jackson FR (2005) Dopamine is a regulator of arousal in the fruit fly. J Neurosci 25:7377–7384. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2048-05.2005
Lande R (1979) Quantitative genetic analysis of multivariate evolution, applied to brain: body size allometry. Evolution 33:402–416
Lande R (1984) The genetic correlation between characters maintained by selection, linkage and inbreeding. Genet Res 44:309–320
Lessells CM, Boag PT (1987) Unrepeatable repeatabilities: a common mistake. Auk 104:116–121
Menzel R, Heyne A, Kinzel C, Gerber B, Fiala A (1999) Pharmacological dissociation between the reinforcing, sensitizing, and response-releasing functions of reward in honeybee classical conditioning. Behav Neurosci 113:744–754. doi:10.1037/0735-7044.113.4.744
Miyatake T (2001) Diurnal periodicity of death-feigning in Cylas formicarius (Coleoptera: Brentidae). J Insect Behav 14:421–432
Miyatake T, Katayama K, Takeda Y, Nakashima A, Sugita A, Mizumoto M (2004) Is death-feigning adaptive? Heritable variation in fitness difference of death-feigning behaviour. Proc R Soc B 271:2293–2296. doi:10.1023/A:1011196420147
Miyatake T, Tabuchi K, Sasaki K, Okada K, Katayama K, Moriya S (2008) Pleiotropic anti-predator strategies, fleeing and feigning death, correlated with dopamine levels in Tribolium castaneum. Anim Behav 75:113–121. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.04.019
Nakayama S, Miyatake T (2009) Positive genetic correlations between life-history traits and death-feigning behaviour in adzuki bean beetle (Callosobruchus chinensis). Evol Ecol 23:711–722
Ohno T, Miyatake T (2007) Drop or fly? Negative genetic correlation between death-feigning intensity and flying ability as alternative anti-predator strategies. Proc R Soc B 274:555–560. doi:10.1098/rspb.2006.3750
Réale D, Gallant BY, Leblanc M, Festa-Bianchet M (2000) Consistency of temperament in bighorn ewes and correlates with behaviour and life history. Anim Behav 60:589–597. doi:10.1006/anbe.2000.1530
Ruxton GD (2006) Grasshoppers don’t play possum. Nature 440:880. doi:10.1038/440880a
Ruxton GD, Sherratt TN, Speed MP (2004) Avoiding attack: The evolutionary ecology of crypsis, warning signals, and mimicry. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Sargeant AB, Eberhardt LE (1975) Death feigning by ducks in response to predation by red foxes (Vulpes fulva). Am Midl Nat 94:108–119
SAS Institute Inc. (2007) JMP 7. SAS Institute Inc., Cary
Sih A, Kats LB, Maurer EF (2003) Behavioural correlations across situations and the evolution of antipredator behaviour in a sunfish-salamander system. Anim Behav 65:29–44. doi:10.1006/anbe.2002.2025
Sih A, Bell AM, Johnson CJ (2004) Behavioral syndromes: an ecological and evolutionary overview. Trends Ecol Evol 19:372–378. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2004.04.009
Stevenson PA, Hofmann HA, Schoch K, Schildberger K (2000) The fight and flight responses of crickets depleted of biogenic amines. J Neurobiol 43:107–120. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-4695(200005)43:2!107::AID-NEU1O3.0.CO;2-C
Strandberg E, Jacobsson J, Saetre P (2005) Direct genetic, maternal and litter effects on behaviour in German shepherd dogs in Sweden. Livest Prod Sci 93:33–42
Suzuki T, Nakakita H (1991) Tribolium castaneum Herbest, T. confusum J, du V., T. freemani Hinton. In: Yushima K, Kamano S, Tamaki Y (eds) Rearing methods of insects (in Japanese). Nihon Shokubutu-Boueki Kyokai, Tokyo, pp 251–254
van Oers K, de Jong G, Drent PJ, van Noordwijk AJ (2004) Genetic correlations of avian personality traits: correlated response to artificial selection. Behav Genet 34:611–619
van Oers K, de Jong G, van Noordwijk AJ, Kempenaers B, Drent PJ (2005) Contribution of genetics to the study of animal personalities: a review of case studies. Behaviour 142:1185–1206. doi:10.1163/15685390577453936
Walsh B, Lynch M (2000) Least-squares analysis of shortterm selection experiments. In: Evolution and selection of quantitative traits, vol 2. http://nitro.biosci.arizona.edu/zbook/volume2/vol2.html
Weiss A, King JE, Enns RM (2002) Subjective well-being is heritable and genetically correlated with dominance in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). J Pers Soc Psychol 83:1141–1149
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr. Keiichi Takahashi for providing the beetle culture and Y. Takeda and K. Katayama for insect rearing. We also thank Dr. Zenobia Lewis for useful comments on this manuscript. This work was supported by KAKENHI 19370011 and 19657026, Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research, JSPS and MEXT to T.M.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nakayama, S., Nishi, Y. & Miyatake, T. Genetic correlation between behavioural traits in relation to death-feigning behaviour. Popul Ecol 52, 329–335 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10144-009-0188-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10144-009-0188-7