Skip to main content
Log in

Estimation of dispersal distance by mark-recapture experiments using traps: correction of bias caused by the artificial removal by traps

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Population Ecology

Abstract

Although in mark-recapture experiments traps are useful to estimate the dispersal distance of organisms, they cause a dilemma that may be called a kind of Heisenberg effect: a large number of traps should be placed to yield a precise estimate of mean dispersal distance, while these traps shorten the mean dispersal distance itself by intercepting organisms that should have dispersed for further distances. We propose a procedure to solve this dilemma by placing traps uniformly in a lattice pattern, and by assuming a random movement and a constant rate of settlement for organisms. We applied this procedure to estimate the dispersal distance of the sugarcane wireworm Melanotus okinawensis Ohira (Coleoptera: Elateridae). The estimated mean dispersal distance was 143.8 m. Through the use of a conventional method of estimation, the mean dispersal distance was estimated to be 118.1 m. Thus, it was shown that the conventional estimate of dispersal distance was 18% smaller than the corrected estimate in our experiment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akaike H (1973) Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In: Petrov BN, Csadki F (eds) 2nd International symposium on information theory. Akademiai Kiado, Budapest, pp 267--281

  • Broadbent SR, Kendall DG (1953) The random walk of Trichostrongylus retortaeformis. Biometrics 9:460–466

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark JS, Silman M, Kern R, Macklin E, HilleRisLambers J (1999) Seed dispersal near and far: patterns across temperate and tropical forests. Ecology 80:1475--1494

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronin JT, Reeve JD, Wilkens R, Turchin P (2000) The pattern and range of movement of a checkered beetle predator relative to its bark beetle prey. Oikos 90:127–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher RA (1922) On the interpretation of χ2 from contingency tables, and the calculation of P. J R Stat Soc 85:87--94

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkes C (1972) The estimation of the dispersal rate of the adult cabbage root fly (Erioischia brassicae (Bouché)) in the presence of a brassica crop. J Appl Ecol 9:617--632

    Google Scholar 

  • Hokyo N (1980) Preliminary analysis of spatial distribution patterns of underground sugarcane buds attacked by white grubs and wireworms. Proc Int Sugar Cane Technol 17:1746–1758

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt TE, Higley LG, Witkowski JF, Young LJ, Hellmich RL (2001) Dispersal of adult European corn borer (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) within and proximal to irrigated and non-irrigated corn. J Econ Entomol 94:1369--1377

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kishita M, Arakaki N, Kawamura F, Sadoyama Y, Yamamura K (2003) Estimation of population density and dispersal parameters of the adult sugarcane wireworm, Melanotus okinawensis Ohira (Coleoptera: Elateridae), on Ikei Island, Okinawa, by mark-recapture experiments. Appl Entomol Zool 38:233–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mo J, Baker G, Keller M, Roush R (2003) Local dispersal of the diamondback moth (Plutella xylostella (L.)) (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae). Environ Entomol 32:71–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagamine M, Kinjo M (1981) Ecology of the sugarcane wireworm, Melanotus tamusyensis Bates (Coleoptera: Elateridae) (in Japanese). Shokubutsu Boeki 35:477–482

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagamine M, Kinjo M (1990) Report on the establishment of the control technique for the sugarcane wireworm Melanotus okinawensis (in Japanese). Okinawa-ken Togyo Sinkou Kyokai, Naha

  • Ohira H (1988) Notes on Melanotus okinawensis Ohira, 1982 and its allied species from the Ryukyu Archipelago (Coleoptera: Elateridae) (in Japanese with English summary). Edaphologia 38:27--38

    Google Scholar 

  • Okubo A (1980) Diffusion and ecological problems: mathematical models. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Plant RE, Cunningham RT (1991) Analysis of the dispersal of sterile Mediterranean fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) released from a point source. Environ Entomol 20:1493–1503

    Google Scholar 

  • Sato S, Maeto K, Miyata H (2000) Dispersal distance of adult Japanese horntail Urocerus japonicus (Hymenoptera : Siricidae) which causes wood discoloration damage. Appl Entomol Zool 35:333--337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider JC (1999) Dispersal of a highly vagile insect in a heterogeneous environment. Ecology 80:2740--2749

    Google Scholar 

  • Shigesada N (1980) Spatial distribution of dispersing animals. J Math Biol 9:85–96

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shigesada N, Kawasaki K (1997) Biological invasions: theory and practice. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Showers WB, Hellmich RL, Derrick-Robinson ME, Hendrix WH III (2001) Aggregation and dispersal behavior of marked and released European corn borer (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) adults. Environ Entomol 30:700--710

    Google Scholar 

  • Skalski GT, Gilliam JF (2003) A diffusion-based theory of organism dispersal in heterogeneous populations. Am Nat 161:441–458

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Skovgård H (2002) Dispersal of the filth fly parasitoid Spalangia cameroni (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae) in a swine facility using fluorescent dust marking and sentinel pupal bags. Environ Entomol 31:425–431

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith MT, Bancroft J, Li G, Gao R, Teale S (2001) Dispersal of Anoplophora glabripennis (Cerambycidae). Environ Entomol 30:1036–1040

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor RAJ (1978) The relationship between density and distance of dispersing insects. Ecol Entomol 3:63–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Turchin P (1998) Quantitative analysis of movement. Sinauer, Sunderland, Mass.

  • Turchin P, Thoeny WT (1993) Quantifying dispersal of southern pine beetles with mark-recapture experiments and a diffusion model. Ecol Appl 3:187--198

    Google Scholar 

  • Wakamura S, Kozai S, Kegasawa K, Inoue H (1990) Population dynamics of adult Spodoptera litura (Fabricius) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae): dispersal distance of male moths and its seasonal change. Appl Entomol Zool 25:447–456

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace B (1966) On the dispersal of Drosophila. Am Nat 100:551--563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams EJ (1961) The distribution of larvae of randomly moving insects. Aust J Biol Sci 14:598–604

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamamura K (2002) Dispersal distance of heterogeneous populations. Popul Ecol 44:93–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamamura K, Moriya S, Tanaka K (2003) Discrete random walk model to interpret the dispersal parameters of organisms. Ecol Model 161:151–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Yasuda K, Hokyo N (1983) Abnormal ratooning of summer planted sugarcane in Minami-Daito Zima, Okinawa (in Japanese with English summary). Bull Okinawa Agric Exp Stn 8:5--12

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. M. Yokozawa for his valuable comments on the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kohji Yamamura.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yamamura, K., Kishita, M., Arakaki, N. et al. Estimation of dispersal distance by mark-recapture experiments using traps: correction of bias caused by the artificial removal by traps. Popul Ecol 45, 149–155 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10144-003-0152-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10144-003-0152-x

Keywords

Navigation