Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The role of an open artificial intelligence platform in modern neurosurgical education: a preliminary study

  • Research
  • Published:
Neurosurgical Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The use of artificial intelligence in neurosurgical education has been growing in recent times. ChatGPT, a free and easily accessible language model, has been gaining popularity as an alternative education method. It is necessary to explore the potential of this program in neurosurgery education and to evaluate its reliability. This study aimed to show the reliability of ChatGPT by asking various questions to the chat engine, how it can contribute to neurosurgery education by preparing case reports or questions, and its contributions when writing academic articles. The results of the study showed that while ChatGPT provided intriguing and interesting responses, it should not be considered a dependable source of information. The absence of citations for scientific queries raises doubts about the credibility of the answers provided. Therefore, it is not advisable to solely rely on ChatGPT as an educational resource. With further updates and more specific prompts, it may be possible to improve its accuracy. In conclusion, while ChatGPT has potential as an educational tool, its reliability needs to be further evaluated and improved before it can be widely adopted in neurosurgical education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Albert L.Rhoton J cranial anatomy&surgical approaches

  2. Angeli S (2012) Middle fossa approach: indications, technique, and results. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 45:417–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otc.2011.12.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Arriaga MA, Lin J (2012) Translabyrinthine approach: indications, techniques, and results. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 45:399–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otc.2011.12.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Blanco-Gonzalez A, Cabezon A, Seco-Gonzalez A, Conde-Torres D, Antelo-Riveiro P, Pineiro A, Garcia-Fandino R (2022) The role of AI in drug discovery: challenges, opportunities, and strategies

  5. Dagi TF, Barker FG, Glass J (2021) Machine learning and artificial intelligence in neurosurgery: status, prospects, and challenges. Neurosurgery 89:133–142. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuros/nyab170

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Elhammady MS, Telischi FF, Morcos JJ (2012) Retrosigmoid approach: indications, techniques, and results. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 45:375–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otc.2012.02.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Else H (2023) Abstracts written by ChatGPT fool scientists. Nature 613:423–423. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-00056-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gilson A, Safranek C, Huang T, Socrates V, Chi L, Taylor RA, Chartash D (2022) How does ChatGPT perform on the medical licensing exams ? The implications of large language models for medical education and knowledge assessment. 1–9

  9. Gordijn B, ten Have H (2023) ChatGPT: evolution or revolution? Med Heal Care Philos 4:56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-023-10136-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Greenberg MS Handbook of neurosurgery 9th Edition

  11. Guerrero-Rodriguez E, Padilla-Medina JR, Reyes-Fernández PM, Peña-Martínez VM, Saavedra-Badillo LA, Acosta-Olivo CA (2022) Spinal epidural hematoma in antiphospholipid syndrome: case report and review of the literature. Spinal Cord Ser Cases 8:1–4. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41394-022-00476-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gurses ME, Gungor A, Gökalp E, Hanalioglu S, KaratasOkumus SY, Tatar I, Berker M, Cohen-Gadol AA, Türe U (2022) Three-dimensional modeling and augmented and virtual reality simulations of the white matter anatomy of the cerebrum. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown, Md) 23:355–366. https://doi.org/10.1227/ons.0000000000000361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gurses ME, Gungor A, Rahmanov S, Gökalp E, Hanalioglu S, Berker M, Cohen-Gadol AA, Türe U (2022) Three-dimensional modeling and augmented reality and virtual reality simulation of fiber dissection of the cerebellum and brainstem. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown, Md) 23:345–354. https://doi.org/10.1227/ons.0000000000000358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Huh S (2023) Are ChatGPT’s knowledge and interpretation ability comparable to those of medical students in Korea for taking a parasitology examination?: a descriptive study. J Educ Eval Health Prof 20:1. https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2023.20.01

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Isaacs D, Elliot C, Kilham H, Preisz A (2021) The ethics of publishing in medical journals. Paediatr Respir Rev 39:41–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prrv.2019.04.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kaul V, Enslin S, Gross SA (2020) History of artificial intelligence in medicine. Gastrointest Endosc 92:807–812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2020.06.040

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Koltovskaia S (2020) Student engagement with automated written corrective feedback (AWCF) provided by Grammarly: a multiple case study. Assess Writ 44:100450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2020.100450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Van Leeuwen JPPM, Meijer E, Grotenhuis JA, Thijssen HOM, Cremers CWRJ (1996) Suboccipital surgery for acoustic neuroma. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 21:244–251. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2273.1996.tb01734.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Li X, Hu Z, Cui J, Han Y, Pan J, Yang MJ, Tan J, Sun G, Li L (2016) Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for recurrent lumbar disc herniation. Int J Surg 27:8–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.01.034

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Li YS, Lam CSN, See C (2021) Using a machine learning architecture to create an AI-powered chatbot for anatomy education. Med Sci Educ 31:1729–1730. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-021-01405-9

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Lin MPC, Chang D (2020) Enhancing post-secondary writers’writing skills with a chatbot: a mixed-method classroom study. Educ Technol Soc 23:78–92

    Google Scholar 

  22. Luo Y, Pearson AT (2022) Comparing scientific abstracts generated by ChatGPT to original abstracts using an artificial intelligence output detector, plagiarism detector, and blinded human reviewers

  23. Lyons HS, Ramalingam S, Mitchell JL, Yiangou A, Thaller M, Sinclair AJ, Mollan SP (2022) Multiple lumbar punctures aiming to relieve headache results in iatrogenic spinal hematoma: a case report. J Med Case Rep 16:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13256-022-03687-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Moore KL Clinically oriented anatomy 8th edition

  25. Nazari N, Shabbir MS, Setiawan R (2021) Application of artificial intelligence powered digital writing assistant in higher education: randomized controlled trial. Heliyon 7:07014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Nicolosi F, Rossini Z, Zaed I, Kolias AG, Fornari M, Servadei F (2018) Neurosurgical digital teaching in low-middle income countries: beyond the frontiers of traditional education. Neurosurg Focus 45:1–8. https://doi.org/10.3171/2018.7.FOCUS18288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Nissen T, Wynn R (2014) The clinical case report: a review of its merits and limitations. BMC Res Notes 7:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-7-264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. O’Connor S, ChatGPT, (2023) Open artificial intelligence platforms in nursing education: tools for academic progress or abuse? Nurse Educ Pract 66:103537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2022.103537

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Orešković D, Klarica M (2014) A new look at cerebrospinal fluid movement. Fluids Barriers CNS 11:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/2045-8118-11-16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ottaiano AC, de Freddi T, AL, Lucio LL, (2022) The olfactory nerve: anatomy and pathology. Semin Ultrasound, CT MRI 43:371–377. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sult.2022.04.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Popenici SAD, Kerr S (2017) Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence on teaching and learning in higher education. Res Pract Technol Enhanc Learn 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-017-0062-8

  32. Prathamesh Padmakar Churi (2023) Artificial Intelligence in higher education a practical approach

  33. Rahimi M, Zhang LJ (2019) Writing task complexity, students’ motivational beliefs, anxiety and their writing production in English as a second language. Read Writ 32:761–786. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-018-9887-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Ramesh AN, Kambhampati C, Monson JRT, Drew PJ (2004) Artificial intelligence in medicine. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 86:334–338. https://doi.org/10.1308/147870804290

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. ReghinNeto M, Almeida HHM, Almeida JP, Alexim YP, De Almeida MM, Tavares RL, Corrêa AC, De Oliveira E (2018) Suboccipital lateral approach for resection of cerebellopontine angle meningioma: operative video and technical nuances. J Neurol Surgery, Part B Skull Base 79:S397–S398. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1669982

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Rhoton AL, Saeki N, Perlmutter D, Zeal A (1979) Microsurgical anatomy of common aneurysm sites. Clin Neurosurg 26:248–306. https://doi.org/10.1093/neurosurgery/26.cn_suppl_1.248

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Safi Z, Abd-Alrazaq A, Khalifa M, Househ M (2020) Technical aspects of developing chatbots for medical applications: scoping review. J Med Internet Res 22:1–11. https://doi.org/10.2196/19127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Schario ME, Bahner CA, Widenhofer TV, Rajaballey JI, Thatcher EJ (2022) Chatbot-assisted care management. Prof Case Manag 27:19–25. https://doi.org/10.1097/NCM.0000000000000504

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Shen Y, Heacock L, Elias J, Hentel KD, Reig B, Shih G, Moy L (2023) ChatGPT and other large language models are double-edged swords. Radiology 78:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.230163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Stokel-walker BC Chatgpt listed as author on research papers

  41. Stuart Russell, Peter Norvig (2010) Artificial intelligence a modern approach 3rd edition

  42. Tansomboon C, Gerard LF, Vitale JM, Linn MC (2017) Designing automated guidance to promote productive revision of science explanations. Int J Artif Intell Educ 27:729–757. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-017-0145-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Thorp HH (2023) ChatGPT is fun, but not an author. Science 80(379):313–313. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adg7879

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Weizenbaum J (1983) ELIZA—a computer program for the study of natural language communication between man and machine. Commun ACM 26:23–28. https://doi.org/10.1145/357980.357991

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Van Der Windt DAWM, Simons E, Riphagen I, Ammendolia C, Verhagen AP, Laslett M, Devillé W, Aertgeerts B, Deyo RA, Bouter LM, De Vet HCW (2008) Physical examination for lumbar radiculopathy due to disc herniation in patients with low-back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007431

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Yakar F, Jacobs R, Agarwal N (2020) The current usage of Instagram in neurosurgery. Interdiscip Neurosurg Adv Tech Case Manag 19:100553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inat.2019.100553

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank OpenAI, the developer of the artificial intelligence software for which this program and the figure were prepared, and also Ph.D. student Cigdem Irem Ileri from Koc University for her ideas and support in the preparation of the article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design, and they all evaluated ChatGPT’s responses. Gökberk Erol and Umut Tan Sevgi scanned the literature. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Umut Tan Sevgi, Yücel Doğruel, Gökberk Erol, Osman Fikret Sönmez, R. Shane Tubbs, and Abuzer Güngör. Shane Tubbs edited the manuscript. Yücel Doğruel and Gökberk Erol prepared the figures. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abuzer Güngor.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethics approval

According to the policy of the institution where this research was conducted, ethics committee approval is not mandatory for this kind of study.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sevgi, U.T., Erol, G., Doğruel, Y. et al. The role of an open artificial intelligence platform in modern neurosurgical education: a preliminary study. Neurosurg Rev 46, 86 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-023-01998-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-023-01998-2

Keywords

Navigation