Abstract
Effective communication is critical in healthcare facilitation. Our aim is to illustrate the impact of digital communication tools in the field of neurosurgery based on the cumulative recently published reports to show an evidence-based review of both benefits and limitations. We performed a systematic review of records published from January 2003 to March 2018. A specific set of keywords such as “digital” and “communication” were used on PubMed database to conduct a thorough online search. 13 articles, out of 52, were comprehensively studied after complying with our inclusion and exclusion criteria. Many of the reviewed studies reported several applications of digital health communication tools in neurosurgery including 46% (6/13) in the Emergency Room and 23% (3/13) in the Operating Room. 38.5% (5/13) were applied in teaching hospitals. Reviewed studies were divided into two groups according to their applications (interventional (3/13) and non-interventional (10/13)). In the Emergency Room, digital health tools facilitated timely diagnosis and management, while in the operating room it permitted revolutionary robotic surgery. It showed potential for “no-risk learning” at academic institutions. While the fruitful impacts were convincing of the digital communication tools’ ability to enhance healthcare in neurosurgery, proper adherence to regulations against data loss and theft, two potential complications of digital tool misuse, must be maintained. Additionally, both time efficiency and the necessity of waiting for better implementation of communication tools proved to be obstacles to consistent digital tool integration.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bayer R, Santelli J, Klitzman R (2015) New challenges for electronic health records: confidentiality and access to sensitive health information about parents and adolescents. JAMA 313:29–30. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.15391
Bernat JL (2013) Ethical and quality pitfalls in electronic health records. Neurology 80:1057–1061. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e318287288c
Christiansen EK, Skipenes E, Hausken MF, Skeie S, Ostbye T, Iversen MM (2017) Shared electronic health record systems: key legal and security challenges. J Diabetes Sci Technol 11:1234–1239. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932296817709797
Crocker M, Cato-Addison WB, Pushpananthan S, Jones TL, Anderson J, Bell BA (2010) Patient safety and image transfer between referring hospitals and neuroscience centres: could we do better? Br J Neurosurg 24:391–395. https://doi.org/10.3109/02688697.2010.508847
de Notaris M, Prats-Galino A, Cavallo LM, Esposito F, Iaconetta G, Gonzalez JB, Montagnani S, Ferrer E, Cappabianca P (2010) Preliminary experience with a new three-dimensional computer-based model for the study and the analysis of skull base approaches. Child’s Nervous System 26:621–626. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-010-1107-0
de Notaris M, Solari D, Cavallo LM, Ensenat J, Alobid I, Soria G, Gonzalez JB, Ferrer E, Prats-Galino A (2011) The use of a three-dimensional novel computer-based model for analysis of the endonasal endoscopic approach to the midline skull base. World Neurosurg 75:106–113; discussion 136-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2010.09.033
Dong M, Chen G, Qin K, Ding X, Zhou D, Peng C, Zeng S, Deng X (2018) Development of three-dimensional brain arteriovenous malformation model for patient communication and young neurosurgeon education. Br J Neurosurg:1–4. https://doi.org/10.1080/02688697.2018.1424320
Eysenbach G (2001) What is e-health? J Med Internet Res 3:E20. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.3.2.e20
Haley T, Ghaemmaghami V, Loftus T, Gerkin RD, Sterrett R, Ferrara JJ (2009) Trauma: the impact of repeat imaging. Am J Surg 198:858–862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.05.030
Liu V, Musen MA, Chou T (2015) Data breaches of protected health information in the United States. JAMA 313:1471–1473. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2015.2252
Macyszyn L, Lega B, Bohman LE, Latefi A, Smith MJ, Malhotra NR, Welch W, Grady SM (2013) Implementation of a departmental picture archiving and communication system: a productivity and cost analysis. Neurosurgery 73:528–533. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.neu.0000431474.49042.5b
Mandel M, Petito CE, Tutihashi R, Paiva W, Abramovicz Mandel S, Gomes Pinto FC, Ferreira de Andrade A, Teixeira MJ, Figueiredo EG (2018) Smartphone-assisted minimally invasive neurosurgery. J Neurosurg:1–9. https://doi.org/10.3171/2017.6.Jns1712
Mendez I, Hill R, Clarke D, Kolyvas G, Walling S (2005) Robotic long-distance telementoring in neurosurgery. Neurosurgery 56:434–440 discussion 434-440
Molyneux AJ, Kerr RSC, Yu L-M, Clarke M, Sneade M, Yarnold JA, Sandercock P (2005) International subarachnoid aneurysm trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised comparison of effects on survival, dependency, seizures, rebleeding, subgroups, and aneurysm occlusion. Lancet 366:809–817. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(05)67214-5
Sethi N, Lane G, Newton S, Egan P, Ghosh S (2014) Disaster easily averted? Data confidentiality and the hospital desktop computer. Int J Med Inform 83:385–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.02.002
Shibata Y (2011) A remote desktop-based telemedicine system. J Clin Neurosci 18:661–663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2010.10.005
Stablein T, Loud KJ, DiCapua C, Anthony DL (2018) The catch to confidentiality: the use of electronic health records in adolescent health care. J Adolesc Health 62:577–582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2017.11.296
Stepan K, Zeiger J, Hanchuk S, Del Signore A, Shrivastava R, Govindaraj S, Iloreta A (2017) Immersive virtual reality as a teaching tool for neuroanatomy. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 7:1006–1013. https://doi.org/10.1002/alr.21986
Sung JC, Sodickson A, Ledbetter S (2009) Outside CT imaging among emergency department transfer patients. J Am Coll Radiol 6:626–632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2009.04.010
Thapa A (2015) Author’s Reply. Neurol India 63:642
Thapa A, Kc B, Shakya B (2016) Cost effective use of free-to-use apps in neurosurgery (FAN) in developing countries: from clinical decision making to educational courses, strengthening health care delivery. World Neurosurg 95:270–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2016.08.001
Tian Z, Lu W, Wang T, Ma B, Zhao Q, Zhang G (2008) Application of a robotic telemanipulation system in stereotactic surgery. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 86:54–61. https://doi.org/10.1159/000110742
Wong GK, Zhu CX, Ahuja AT, Poon WS (2007) Craniotomy and clipping of intracranial aneurysm in a stereoscopic virtual reality environment. Neurosurgery 61:564–568; discussion 568-569. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.Neu.0000290904.46061.0d
Yamada M, Watarai H, Andou T, Sakai N (2003) Emergency image transfer system through a mobile telephone in Japan: technical note. Neurosurgery 52:986–988 discussion 988-990
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
Upon consultation with our Research Ethical Committee (REC), we were considered exempt to ethical approval due to not including any new patient information from our clinic.
Informed consent
Consent was not necessary in our case as our manuscript is a review article that includes records that have previously been published. Our patients’ records were not inspected nor investigated.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nanah, A., Bayoumi, A.B. The pros and cons of digital health communication tools in neurosurgery: a systematic review of literature. Neurosurg Rev 43, 835–846 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-018-1043-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-018-1043-0