Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The pros and cons of digital health communication tools in neurosurgery: a systematic review of literature

  • Review
  • Published:
Neurosurgical Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Effective communication is critical in healthcare facilitation. Our aim is to illustrate the impact of digital communication tools in the field of neurosurgery based on the cumulative recently published reports to show an evidence-based review of both benefits and limitations. We performed a systematic review of records published from January 2003 to March 2018. A specific set of keywords such as “digital” and “communication” were used on PubMed database to conduct a thorough online search. 13 articles, out of 52, were comprehensively studied after complying with our inclusion and exclusion criteria. Many of the reviewed studies reported several applications of digital health communication tools in neurosurgery including 46% (6/13) in the Emergency Room and 23% (3/13) in the Operating Room. 38.5% (5/13) were applied in teaching hospitals. Reviewed studies were divided into two groups according to their applications (interventional (3/13) and non-interventional (10/13)). In the Emergency Room, digital health tools facilitated timely diagnosis and management, while in the operating room it permitted revolutionary robotic surgery. It showed potential for “no-risk learning” at academic institutions. While the fruitful impacts were convincing of the digital communication tools’ ability to enhance healthcare in neurosurgery, proper adherence to regulations against data loss and theft, two potential complications of digital tool misuse, must be maintained. Additionally, both time efficiency and the necessity of waiting for better implementation of communication tools proved to be obstacles to consistent digital tool integration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bayer R, Santelli J, Klitzman R (2015) New challenges for electronic health records: confidentiality and access to sensitive health information about parents and adolescents. JAMA 313:29–30. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.15391

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bernat JL (2013) Ethical and quality pitfalls in electronic health records. Neurology 80:1057–1061. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e318287288c

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Christiansen EK, Skipenes E, Hausken MF, Skeie S, Ostbye T, Iversen MM (2017) Shared electronic health record systems: key legal and security challenges. J Diabetes Sci Technol 11:1234–1239. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932296817709797

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Crocker M, Cato-Addison WB, Pushpananthan S, Jones TL, Anderson J, Bell BA (2010) Patient safety and image transfer between referring hospitals and neuroscience centres: could we do better? Br J Neurosurg 24:391–395. https://doi.org/10.3109/02688697.2010.508847

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. de Notaris M, Prats-Galino A, Cavallo LM, Esposito F, Iaconetta G, Gonzalez JB, Montagnani S, Ferrer E, Cappabianca P (2010) Preliminary experience with a new three-dimensional computer-based model for the study and the analysis of skull base approaches. Child’s Nervous System 26:621–626. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-010-1107-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. de Notaris M, Solari D, Cavallo LM, Ensenat J, Alobid I, Soria G, Gonzalez JB, Ferrer E, Prats-Galino A (2011) The use of a three-dimensional novel computer-based model for analysis of the endonasal endoscopic approach to the midline skull base. World Neurosurg 75:106–113; discussion 136-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2010.09.033

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dong M, Chen G, Qin K, Ding X, Zhou D, Peng C, Zeng S, Deng X (2018) Development of three-dimensional brain arteriovenous malformation model for patient communication and young neurosurgeon education. Br J Neurosurg:1–4. https://doi.org/10.1080/02688697.2018.1424320

  8. Eysenbach G (2001) What is e-health? J Med Internet Res 3:E20. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.3.2.e20

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Haley T, Ghaemmaghami V, Loftus T, Gerkin RD, Sterrett R, Ferrara JJ (2009) Trauma: the impact of repeat imaging. Am J Surg 198:858–862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.05.030

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Liu V, Musen MA, Chou T (2015) Data breaches of protected health information in the United States. JAMA 313:1471–1473. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2015.2252

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Macyszyn L, Lega B, Bohman LE, Latefi A, Smith MJ, Malhotra NR, Welch W, Grady SM (2013) Implementation of a departmental picture archiving and communication system: a productivity and cost analysis. Neurosurgery 73:528–533. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.neu.0000431474.49042.5b

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mandel M, Petito CE, Tutihashi R, Paiva W, Abramovicz Mandel S, Gomes Pinto FC, Ferreira de Andrade A, Teixeira MJ, Figueiredo EG (2018) Smartphone-assisted minimally invasive neurosurgery. J Neurosurg:1–9. https://doi.org/10.3171/2017.6.Jns1712

  13. Mendez I, Hill R, Clarke D, Kolyvas G, Walling S (2005) Robotic long-distance telementoring in neurosurgery. Neurosurgery 56:434–440 discussion 434-440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Molyneux AJ, Kerr RSC, Yu L-M, Clarke M, Sneade M, Yarnold JA, Sandercock P (2005) International subarachnoid aneurysm trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised comparison of effects on survival, dependency, seizures, rebleeding, subgroups, and aneurysm occlusion. Lancet 366:809–817. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(05)67214-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sethi N, Lane G, Newton S, Egan P, Ghosh S (2014) Disaster easily averted? Data confidentiality and the hospital desktop computer. Int J Med Inform 83:385–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.02.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Shibata Y (2011) A remote desktop-based telemedicine system. J Clin Neurosci 18:661–663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2010.10.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Stablein T, Loud KJ, DiCapua C, Anthony DL (2018) The catch to confidentiality: the use of electronic health records in adolescent health care. J Adolesc Health 62:577–582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2017.11.296

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Stepan K, Zeiger J, Hanchuk S, Del Signore A, Shrivastava R, Govindaraj S, Iloreta A (2017) Immersive virtual reality as a teaching tool for neuroanatomy. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 7:1006–1013. https://doi.org/10.1002/alr.21986

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sung JC, Sodickson A, Ledbetter S (2009) Outside CT imaging among emergency department transfer patients. J Am Coll Radiol 6:626–632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2009.04.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Thapa A (2015) Author’s Reply. Neurol India 63:642

    Google Scholar 

  21. Thapa A, Kc B, Shakya B (2016) Cost effective use of free-to-use apps in neurosurgery (FAN) in developing countries: from clinical decision making to educational courses, strengthening health care delivery. World Neurosurg 95:270–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2016.08.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Tian Z, Lu W, Wang T, Ma B, Zhao Q, Zhang G (2008) Application of a robotic telemanipulation system in stereotactic surgery. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 86:54–61. https://doi.org/10.1159/000110742

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Wong GK, Zhu CX, Ahuja AT, Poon WS (2007) Craniotomy and clipping of intracranial aneurysm in a stereoscopic virtual reality environment. Neurosurgery 61:564–568; discussion 568-569. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.Neu.0000290904.46061.0d

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Yamada M, Watarai H, Andou T, Sakai N (2003) Emergency image transfer system through a mobile telephone in Japan: technical note. Neurosurgery 52:986–988 discussion 988-990

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ahmed B. Bayoumi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

Upon consultation with our Research Ethical Committee (REC), we were considered exempt to ethical approval due to not including any new patient information from our clinic.

Informed consent

Consent was not necessary in our case as our manuscript is a review article that includes records that have previously been published. Our patients’ records were not inspected nor investigated.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nanah, A., Bayoumi, A.B. The pros and cons of digital health communication tools in neurosurgery: a systematic review of literature. Neurosurg Rev 43, 835–846 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-018-1043-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-018-1043-0

Keywords

Navigation