Skip to main content
Log in

Endoscopic endonasal approach to the ethmoidal planum: anatomic study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neurosurgical Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The endoscopic endonasal technique is currently used by otolaryngologists for the management of different extradural lesions located below the ethmoidal planum. The cooperation between ENTs and neurosurgeons has recently pushed the use of such approach also in the removal of some intradural lesions, which has promoted the interest for an anatomic study to identify the anatomical landmarks and the dangerous points during the endoscopic approach to this area. In six fresh cadaver heads, unilateral and bilateral measurements between the main landmarks of the approach were performed by means of an endoscopic endonasal approach. A wide exposure of the midline anterior skull base was realized. The maximum of lateral extension was obtained between the two medial orbital walls, at the middle of the cribriform plate (mean distance 25,33 mm), while the mean distance between the anterior and posterior ethmoidal arteries at the level of the lamina papyracea was 16 mm. The endoscopic endonasal route can be considered a minimally invasive technique to approach the ethmoidal planum. It requires adequate anatomical knowledge and endoscopic skill for its realization. Due to the wide window realizable through this corridor, it could be considered in selected cases for the removal of intradural lesions such as meningiomas or estesioneuroblastomas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Al-Mefty O (2003) Comment to the article: Liu JK, Decker D, Schaefer SD, Moscatello AL, Orlandi RR, Weiss MH, Couldwell WT: Zones of approach for craniofacial resection: minimizing facial incisions for resection of anterior cranial base and paranasal sinus tumors. Neurosurgery 53:1136

    Google Scholar 

  2. Al-Mefty O (1987) Supraorbital–pterional approach to skull base lesions. Neurosurgery 21:474–477

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Batra PS, Citardi MJ (2006) Endoscopic management of sinonasal malignancy. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 39:619–637, x-xi

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Blacklock JB, Weber RS, Lee YY, Goepfert H (1989) Transcranial resection of tumors of the paranasal sinuses and nasal cavity. J Neurosurg 71:10–15

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cappabianca P, Alfieri A, de Divitiis E (1998) Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach to the sella: towards functional endoscopic pituitary surgery (FEPS). Minim Invasive Neurosurg 41:66–73

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Cappabianca P, Cavallo LM, de Divitiis E (2004) Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery. Neurosurgery 55:933–940, discussion 940–931

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Carrau RL, Jho HD, Ko Y (1996) Transnasal–transsphenoidal endoscopic surgery of the pituitary gland. Laryngoscope 106:914–918

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Carrau RL, Snyderman CH, Kassam AB, Jungreis CA (2001) Endoscopic and endoscopic-assisted surgery for juvenile angiofibroma. Laryngoscope 111:483–487

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Castelnuovo P, Locatelli D, Mauri S (2003) Extended endoscopic approaches to the skull base. Anterior cranial base CSF leaks. In: de Divitiis E, Cappabianca P (eds) Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery. Springer, Wien-New York, pp 137–158

    Google Scholar 

  10. Castelnuovo PG, Delu G, Sberze F, Pistochini A, Cambria C, Battaglia P, Bignami M (2006) Esthesioneuroblastoma: endonasal endoscopic treatment. Skull Base 16:25–30

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cavallo LM, Messina A, Cappabianca P, Esposito F, de Divitiis E, Gardner P, Tschabitscher M (2005) Endoscopic endonasal surgery of the midline skull base: anatomical study and clinical considerations. Neurosurg Focus 19:E2

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cheesman AD, Lund VJ, Howard DJ (1986) Craniofacial resection for tumors of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses. Head Neck Surg 8:429–435

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Cook SW, Smith Z, Kelly DF (2004) Endonasal transsphenoidal removal of tuberculum sellae meningiomas: technical note. Neurosurgery 55:239–244, discussion 244–236

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. de Divitiis E, Cappabianca P, Cavallo LM (2003) Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach to the sellar region. In: de Divitiis E, Cappabianca P (eds) Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery. Springer, Wien - New York, pp 91–130

    Google Scholar 

  15. de Divitiis E, Cappabianca P, Cavallo LM (2002) Endoscopic transsphenoidal approach: adaptability of the procedure to different sellar lesions. Neurosurgery 51:699–705, discussion 705–697

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Erdogmus S, Govsa F (2006) The anatomic landmarks of ethmoidal arteries for the surgical approaches. J Craniofac Surg 17:280–285

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Frank G, Pasquini E, Doglietto F, Mazzatenta D, Sciaretta V, Farneti G, Calbucci F (2006) The endoscopic extended transsphenoidal approach for craniopharyngiomas. Neurosurgery 59:75–83

    Google Scholar 

  18. Frank G, Pasquini E, Mazzatenta D (2001) Extended transsphenoidal approach. J Neurosurg 95:917–918

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Hao SP, Wang HS, Lui TN (1995) Transnasal endoscopic management of basal encephalocele–craniotomy is no longer mandatory. Am J Otolaryngol 16:196–199

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hosemann W, Nitsche N, Rettinger G, Wigand ME (1991) Endonasal, endoscopically controlled repair of dura defects of the anterior skull base. Laryngorhinootologie 70:115–119

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Jho HD, Carrau RL, Ko Y (1996) Endoscopic pituitary surgery. In: Wilkins H, Rengachary S (eds) Neurosurgical operative atlas. American Association of Neurological Surgeons, Park Ridge, pp 1–12

    Google Scholar 

  22. Jho HD, Ha HG (2004) Endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery: Part 1–The midline anterior fossa skull base. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 47:1–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kaplan M (2000) Transcutaneous transfacial approaches to the anterior skull base. In: Lawton M (ed) Operative techniques in neurosurgery

  24. Kassam AB, Gardner P, Snyderman C, Mintz A, Carrau R (2005) Expanded endonasal approach: fully endoscopic, completely transnasal approach to the middle third of the clivus, petrous bone, middle cranial fossa, and infratemporal fossa. Neurosurg Focus 19:E6

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kassam AB, Mintz AH, Gardner PA, Horowitz MB, Carrau RL, Snyderman CH (2006) The expanded endonasal approach for an endoscopic transnasal clipping and aneurysmorrhaphy of a large vertebral artery aneurysm: technical case report. Neurosurgery 59:ONSE162–165, discussion ONSE162–165

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kassam AB, Snyderman C, Gardner P, Carrau R, Spiro R (2005) The expanded endonasal approach: a fully endoscopic transnasal approach and resection of the odontoid process: technical case report. Neurosurgery 57:E213

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kennedy DW (1985) Functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Technique. Arch Otolaryngol 111:643–649

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Kennedy DW, Goodstein ML, Miller NR, Zinreich SJ (1990) Endoscopic transnasal orbital decompression. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 116:275–282

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Ketcham AS, Chretien PB, Van Buren JM, Hoye RC, Beazley RM, Herdt JR (1973) The ethmoid sinuses: a re-evaluation of surgical resection. Am J Surg 126:469–476

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Lalwani AK, Kaplan MJ, Gutin PH (1992) The transsphenoethmoid approach to the sphenoid sinus and clivus. Neurosurgery 31:1008–1014

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Lang J (2001) Skull base and related structures. Atlas of clinical anatomy. Schattauer, Stuttgart-New York, pp 94–112

    Google Scholar 

  32. Laws E (1993) Clivus chordomas. In: Sekhar LN, Janecka IP (eds) Surgery of cranial base tumors. Raven Press, New York, pp 679–685

    Google Scholar 

  33. Liu JK, Decker D, Schaefer SD, Moscatello AL, Orlandi RR, Weiss MH, Couldwell WT (2003) Zones of approach for craniofacial resection: minimizing facial incisions for resection of anterior cranial base and paranasal sinus tumors. Neurosurgery 53:1126–1135, discussion 1135–1127

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Locatelli D, Rampa F, Acchiardi I, Bignami M, De Bernardi F, Castelnuovo P (2006) Endoscopic endonasal approaches for repair of cerebrospinal fluid leaks: nine-year experience. Neurosurgery 58:ONS–246–256, discussion ONS-256–247

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Maira G, Pallini R, Anile C, Fernandez E, Salvinelli F, La Rocca LM, Rossi GF (1996) Surgical treatment of clival chordomas: the transsphenoidal approach revisited. J Neurosurg 85:784–792

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. McCutcheon IE, Blacklock JB, Weber RS, DeMonte F, Moser RP, Byers M, Goepfert H (1996) Anterior transcranial (craniofacial) resection of tumors of the paranasal sinuses: surgical technique and results. Neurosurgery 38:471–479, discussion 479–480

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Messerklinger W (1987) [Role of the lateral nasal wall in the pathogenesis, diagnosis and therapy of recurrent and chronic rhinosinusitis]. Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg) 66:293–299

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Moon HJ, Kim HU, Lee JG, Chung IH, Yoon JH (2001) Surgical anatomy of the anterior ethmoidal canal in ethmoid roof. Laryngoscope 111:900–904

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Raftopoulos C, Baleriaux D, Hancq S, Closset J, David P, Brotchi J (1995) Evaluation of endoscopy in the treatment of rare meningoceles: preliminary results. Surg Neurol 44:308–317, discussion 317–308

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Simmen D, Raghavan U, Briner HR, Manestar M, Schuknecht B, Groscurth P, Jones NS (2006) The surgeon’s view of the anterior ethmoid artery. Clin Otolaryngol 31:187–191

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Spencer WR, Das K, Nwagu C, Wenk E, Schaefer SD, Moscatello A, Couldwell WT (1999) Approaches to the sellar and parasellar region: anatomic comparison of the microscope versus endoscope. Laryngoscope 109:791–794

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Spencer WR, Levine JM, Couldwell WT, Brown-Wagner M, Moscatello A (2000) Approaches to the sellar and parasellar region: a retrospective comparison of the endonasal-transsphenoidal and sublabial-transsphenoidal approaches. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 122:367–369

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Stammberger H (1986) Endoscopic endonasal surgery–concepts in treatment of recurring rhinosinusitis. Part I. Anatomic and pathophysiologic considerations. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 94:143–147

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Stammberger H (1986) Endoscopic endonasal surgery–concepts in treatment of recurring rhinosinusitis. Part II. Surgical technique. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 94:147–156

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Stammberger H, Hosemann W, Draf W (1997) [Anatomic terminology and nomenclature for paranasal sinus surgery]. Laryngorhinootologie 76:435–449

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Stammberger H, Posawetz W (1990) Functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Concept, indications and results of the Messerklinger technique. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 247:63–76

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Thaler ER, Kotapka M, Lanza DC, Kennedy DW (1999) Endoscopically assisted anterior cranial skull base resection of sinonasal tumors. Am J Rhinol 13:303–310

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Tosun F, Carrau RL, Snyderman CH, Kassam A, Celin S, Schaitkin B (2003) Endonasal endoscopic repair of cerebrospinal fluid leaks of the sphenoid sinus. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 129:576–580

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. White DV, Sincoff EH, Abdulrauf SI (2005) Anterior ethmoidal artery: microsurgical anatomy and technical considerations. Neurosurgery 56:406–410, discussion 406–410

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Yuen AP, Fung CF, Hung KN (1997) Endoscopic cranionasal resection of anterior skull base tumor. Am J Otolaryngol 18:431–433

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Zada G, Kelly DF, Cohan P, Wang C, Swerdloff R (2003) Endonasal transsphenoidal approach for pituitary adenomas and other sellar lesions: an assessment of efficacy, safety, and patient impressions. J Neurosurg 98:350–358

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by Grant I/05/A/PL-154419-SU of the Leonardo da Vinci European Community Vocational Training Action Programme.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paolo Cappabianca.

Additional information

Comments

Henry Schröder, Greifswald, Germany

De Notaris et al. present an interesting anatomical endonasal dissection study. They performed an endoscopic endonasal approach to the ethmoidal planum in six cadaver heads. The main anatomical landmarks were described, and measurements of the most important distances were performed. The authors considered the extended endonasal approach to the anterior skullbase to be a minimally invasive alternative to the transcranial approaches.

This is a well-written paper. Although numerous publications on the surgical anatomy of the endoscopic endonasal approaches to the skullbase have already been published in the last years, this article is interesting to skullbase surgeons. It describes clearly the steps of the approach and provides useful information. There is no question that the endoscope is an invaluable tool in pituitary and other skullbase surgery. However, I really question the statement that the described extended endonasal approach with destruction of most of the normal anatomy of the inner nose is really minimally invasive. Moreover, the problem of CSF leaks is still obvious in these approaches. The avoidance of a visible skin incision is only of minor importance. I think that a small supraorbital craniotomy via an eyebrow incision is less invasive than the approach described in this paper. The cosmetic results are excellent too. The main advantage of the endonasal approach, in my opinion, is the avoidance of any brain retraction.

I am sure that the use of endoscopes in skullbase surgery will become more and more common in the near future. With further improvement in video camera resolution, as recently having been achieved with the High Definition (HD) imaging, endoscopes will displace the microscope in more fields of neurosurgery.

Comments

Daniel Kelly, Santa Monica, USA

In this well-illustrated cadaveric study of the endonasal approach to the ethmoidal planum, Dr. Cappabianca et al. have demonstrated the feasibility of this approach, its anatomical limits and potential pitfalls. As they note, this approach is potentially advantageous for a number of anterior skull-based lesions by obviating the need for direct brain retraction and facial or scalp incisions. The potential down-sides of this approach include three major issues that over time will need to be further clarified: (1) the extent of access for lesions that extend laterally beyond the midline, (2) the ability to consistently achieve an effective skull base repair and avoid a postoperative CSF leak, and (3) the long-term sino-nasal consequences of extensive bony and soft tissue removal including bilateral middle turbinate resections, superior nasal–septal resection, and ethmoidectomies. It is through detailed anatomical dissections like these and their applied experience that such approaches will become more widely used in the clinical arena. Already over the last few years, the postoperative CSF leak rate for these approaches appears to be declining significantly at specialized endonasal surgery centers around the world. However, as the authors note, these endoscopic skull-based techniques are technically demanding and require an experienced surgical team such as the one in Naples to maximize their safety and efficacy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

de Notaris, M., Esposito, I., Cavallo, L.M. et al. Endoscopic endonasal approach to the ethmoidal planum: anatomic study. Neurosurg Rev 31, 309–317 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-008-0130-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-008-0130-z

Keywords

Navigation