Skip to main content
Log in

Pediatric skull fractures: could suture contact be a sign of abuse?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Emergency Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Skull fractures in infants and young children can occur as a result of both accidental trauma and abuse. 1/3 of children with abuse-related head trauma and 1/5 of children with abuse-related fractures were overlooked during the initial evaluation. In this study, we aim to investigate the prevalence of skull fractures that come into contact with the suture in head traumas caused by accidents and abuse, and also to see if contact of the fracture line with the suture could be used as a sign for abuse in the pediatric population.

Methods

Forry-four patients with head trauma were retrospectively assessed between January 2010 and June 2020 and were confirmed to have fractures on a brain CT. Patient age, gender, and head injury type were recorded. The fracture site, location and number, the contact of the fracture line with the suture, the name, and number of the suture it came into contact with were determined.

Results

Twenty-eight skull fractures in 22 children with a diagnosis of child abuse and 25 skull fractures in 22 children due to accidental trauma were evaluated in the same age and gender range. Eighteen (64%) of 28 abuse-related skull fractures were in contact with two or more sutures. Two (8%) of 25 accident-related fractures were related to two or more sutures. Abuse-related fractures had a significantly higher suture contact rate than accident-related fractures (p = 0.007).

Conclusion

Contact with two or more sutures of a skull fracture is a finding related to abuse rather than accident.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Chevignard MP, Lind K (2014) Long-term outcome of abusive head trauma. Pediatr Radiol 44(4):548–558. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-014-3169-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Choudhary AK, Servaes S, Slovis TL, Palusci VJ, Hedlund GL, Narang SK, Moreno JA, Dias MS, Christian CW, Nelson MD Jr, Silvera VM, Palasis S, Raissaki M, Rossi A, Offiah AC (2018) Consensus statement on abusive head trauma in infants and young children. Pediatr Radiol 48(8):1048–1065. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-018-4149-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sidpra J, Ong J, Birch W, Mankad KJCsns (2021) Skull fractures in abusive head trauma: a single centre experience and review of the literature. 37 (3):919–929

  4. Squier W (2011) The “Shaken Baby” syndrome: pathology and mechanisms. Acta Neuropathol 122(5):519–542. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-011-0875-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Orman G, Kralik SF, Meoded A, Desai N, Risen S, Huisman TAJJoN (2020) MRI findings in pediatric abusive head trauma: a review. 30 (1):15–27

  6. Lonergan GJ, Baker AM, Morey MK, Boos SC (2003) From the archives of the AFIP. Child abuse: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc 23 (4):811–845. doi:https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.234035030

  7. Kriss S, Morris J, Martich VJAJoR (2021) Pediatric skull fractures contacting sutures: relevance in abusive head trauma.1–5

  8. Deye KP, Berger RP, Lindberg DM, trauma EIJJo, surgery ac (2013) Occult abusive injuries in infants with apparently isolated skull fractures. 74 (6):1553–1558

  9. Piteau SJ, Ward MG, Barrowman NJ, Plint ACJP (2012) Clinical and radiographic characteristics associated with abusive and nonabusive head trauma: a systematic review 130(2):315–323

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jenny C, Hymel KP, Ritzen A, Reinert SE, Hay TC (1999) Analysis of missed cases of abusive head trauma. JAMA 281(7):621–626. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.281.7.621

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Reece RM, Sege R (2000) Childhood head injuries: accidental or inflicted? Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 154(1):11–15

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Meservy CJ, Towbin R, McLaurin RL, Myers PA, Ball W (1987) Radiographic characteristics of skull fractures resulting from child abuse. AJR Am J Roentgenol 149(1):173–175. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.149.1.173

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hobbs CJ (1984) Skull fracture and the diagnosis of abuse. Arch Dis Child 59(3):246–252. https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.59.3.246

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Barber I, Kleinman PKJPr (2014) Imaging of skeletal injuries associated with abusive head trauma. 44 (4):613–620

  15. Kemp AM, Dunstan F, Harrison S, Morris S, Mann M, Rolfe K, Datta S, Thomas DP, Sibert JR, Maguire SJB (2008) Patterns of skeletal fractures in child abuse: systematic review. 337

  16. Christian CW, Abuse CoC, Pediatrics NJ (2015) The evaluation of suspected child physical abuse. 135 (5):e1337-e1354

  17. Hung K-LJbj (2020) Pediatric abusive head trauma. 43 (3):240–250

  18. Paddock M, Sprigg A, Offiah AC (2017) Imaging and reporting considerations for suspected physical abuse (non-accidental injury) in infants and young children. Part 2: axial skeleton and differential diagnoses. Clinical radiology 72 (3):189–201. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2016.11.015

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by Berna Uçan and Sonay Aydın. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Oğuzhan Tokur and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Oğuzhan Tokur.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Approval was granted by the Ethics Committee of Erzincan Binali Yildirim University (11.09.2021-Ebyu/Kaek).

Consent for publication

Written consent to publish this information was obtained from the study participant.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Uçan, B., Tokur, O. & Aydın, S. Pediatric skull fractures: could suture contact be a sign of abuse?. Emerg Radiol 29, 403–408 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-022-02024-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-022-02024-6

Keywords

Navigation