Skip to main content
Log in

Variation in emergency department use of computed tomography for investigation of acute aortic dissection

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Emergency Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Acute aortic dissection (AAD) is a life-threatening condition making early diagnosis critical. Although 90% present with acute pain, the myriad of associated symptoms can make diagnosis a challenge. Our objective was to assess how we are using computed tomography to rule out acute aortic dissection specifically rate of ordering, diagnostic yield, and variation in practice.

Methods

We included consecutive adult patients presenting to two tertiary academic care emergency departments over one calendar year presenting with non-traumatic chest, back, abdominal, or flank pain. Primary outcome was rate of CT thorax/abdomen ordered to rule out AAD. Secondary outcome was variation in CT ordering, measured comparing number of CTs ordered per physician. Sample size of 12 per group was calculated based on an expected delta in mean CT ordered of 5 and a within group SD of 3.

Results

Thirty-one thousand two hundred one patients presented with truncal pain during the study period, 22,729 were included (mean 47 years, SD 18.5 years, 56.2% female); prevalence of AAD (N = 4) was 0.02%. CT was ordered to rule out AAD in 175 (0.7%) patients (mean 62 years, SD 16.5, 50.6% female). Significant variation between physicians ordering was found, with individual physicians ordering varying from 0.6 to 12%.

Conclusions

Current rate of imaging for acute aortic dissection is low and potentially inefficient, with a large variation in practice. These findings suggest potential for more standardized and efficient use of CT for the diagnosis of acute aortic dissection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hagan PG, Nienaber CA, Isselbacher EM, Bruckman D, Karavite DJ, Russman PL, Evangelista A, Fattori R, Suzuki T, Oh JK (2000) The international registry of acute aortic dissection (IRAD): new insights into an old disease. JAMA 283(7):897–903. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.283.7.897

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Nazerian P, Giachino F, Vanni S, Veglio MG, Castelli M, Lison D, Bitossi L, Moiraghi C, Grifoni S, Morello F (2014) Diagnostic performance of the aortic dissection detection risk score in patients with suspected acute aortic dissection. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care 3(4):373–381. https://doi.org/10.1177/2048872614527010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Von Kodolitsch Y, Schwartz AG, Nienaber CA (2000) Clinical prediction of acute aortic dissection. Arch Intern Med 160(19):2977–2982. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.160.19.2977

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Diercks DB, Promes SB, Schuur JD, Shah K, Valente JH, Cantrill SV (2015) Clinical policy: critical issues in the evaluation and management of adult patients with suspected acute nontraumatic thoracic aortic dissection. Ann Emerg Med 65(1):32–42. e12

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hiratzka LF, Bakris GL, Beckman JA, Bersin RM, Carr VF, Casey DE, Eagle KA, Hermann LK, Isselbacher EM, Kazerooni EA (2010) 2010 ACCF/AHA/AATS/ACR/ASA/SCA/SCAI/SIR/STS/SVM guidelines for the diagnosis and management of patients with thoracic aortic disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 55(14):e27–e129

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ghaemmaghami CA, Brady WJ (2001) Pitfalls in the emergency department diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. Emerg Med Clin North Am 19(2):351–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0733-8627(05)70188-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Neighbor M, Puntillo K, Homel P, Todd K (2007) Chronic pain in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med 14(5S):S112–S112. https://doi.org/10.1197/j.aem.2007.03.1014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Stiell IG, Clement CM, Grimshaw JM, Brison RJ, Rowe BH, Lee JS, Shah A, Brehaut J, Holroyd BR, Schull MJ (2010) A prospective cluster-randomized trial to implement the Canadian CT Head Rule in emergency departments. Can Med Assoc J 182(14):1527–1532. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.091974

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Stiell IG, Clement CM, Grimshaw J, Brison RJ, Rowe BH, Schull MJ, Lee JS, Brehaut J, McKnight RD, Eisenhauer MA (2009) Implementation of the Canadian C-Spine Rule: prospective 12 centre cluster randomised trial. BMJ 339(oct29 4):b4146. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b4146

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Madder RD, Raff GL, Hickman L, Foster NJ, McMurray MD, Carlyle LM, Boura JA, Chinnaiyan KM (2011) Comparative diagnostic yield and 3-month outcomes of “triple rule-out” and standard protocol coronary CT angiography in the evaluation of acute chest pain. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 5(3):165–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcct.2011.03.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Erbel R, Aboyans V, Boileau C, Bossone E, Di Bartolomeo R, Eggebrecht H, Evangelista A, Falk V, Frank H, Gaemperli O (2014) 2014 ESC Guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of aortic diseases. Eur Heart J 35(41):2873–2926. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehu281

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nazerian P, Morello F, Vanni S, Bono A, Castelli M, Forno D, Gigli C, Soardo F, Carbone F, Lupia E (2014) Combined use of aortic dissection detection risk score and D-dimer in the diagnostic workup of suspected acute aortic dissection. Int J Cardiol 175(1):78–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.04.257

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ohle R, Kareemi HK, Wells G, Perry JJ (2017) Clinical examination for acute aortic dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acad Emerg Med. https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.13360

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert Ohle.

Ethics declarations

Research board ethics approval was sought and obtained

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ohle, R., Anjum, O., Bleeker, H. et al. Variation in emergency department use of computed tomography for investigation of acute aortic dissection. Emerg Radiol 25, 293–298 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-018-1587-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-018-1587-x

Keywords

Navigation