Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Correlation between a continent ileocecal valve and CT signs of severity in patients presenting with obstructive colonic cancer

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Emergency Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To study the association of a continent ileocecal valve and the degree of severity of the CT signs in patients presenting with large bowel obstruction due to colonic cancer.

Patients and methods

Sixty-six patients undergoing emergency surgery for confirmed obstructive colonic cancer were included. The CT examinations were analyzed without consultation of the surgical results. For each patient, the diameter of the cecum at its widest point and that of the last ileal loop were measured. The ileocecal valve was considered incontinent when there was a distension of the last ileal loop greater than or equal to 25 mm. Below 25 mm, the ileocecal valve was considered continent. The presence of CT signs of severity of the LBO was noted, i.e., intestinal pneumatosis, absence of contrast enhancement of the large bowel wall, defect in the large bowel wall, and presence of extra-digestive air and ascites.

Results

Among the 66 patients included, 42 had an incontinent ileocecal valve and 24 had a continental ileocecal valve. There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups in the diametrical measurements of the cecum’s widest point (mean diameter measured at 10.3 cm in patients with continent ileocecal valve vs 8.4 cm in patients with incontinent ileocecal valve, P = 0.0023). Patients with a continent valve had statistically higher rates of CT severity (79% vs 40%, P < 0.005). Perforation of the cecum remained rare (8%) and was only observed in patients with continent ileocecal valve in our series.

Conclusion

Continence of the ileocecal valve appears to be statistically correlated both with cecum distension and the presence of CT signs of severity in patients with obstructive colonic cancer. As such, its presence must be retained as a risk factor for a pejorative evolution of this type of LBO and must be specified in the CT report of these patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sielezneff I, Karoui M (2016) Prise en charge du cancer colique en occlusion: Rapport présenté au 118e Congrès français de chirurgie

    Google Scholar 

  2. Runkel NS, Schlag P, Schwarz V, Herfarth C (1991) Outcome after emergency surgery for cancer of the large intestine. Br J Surg 78(2):183–188

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Longo WE, Virgo KS, Johnson FE, Oprian CA, Vernava AM, Wade TP, Phelan MA, Henderson WG, Daley J, Khuri SF (2000) Risk factors for morbidity and mortality after colectomy for colon cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 43(1):83–91

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Alves A (2005) Postoperative mortality and morbidity in French patients undergoing colorectal surgery: results of a prospective multicenter study. Arch Surg 140(3):278

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sjo OH, Larsen S, Lunde OC, Nesbakken A (2009) Short term outcome after emergency and elective surgery for colon cancer. Color Dis 11(7):733–739

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Tekkis PP, Kinsman R, Thompson MR, Stamatakis JD, Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain, Ireland (2004) The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland study of large bowel obstruction caused by colorectal cancer. Ann Surg 240(1):76–81

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Ridereau-Zins C (2014) Imagerie du cancer colique. Journal de Radiologie Diagnostique et Interventionnelle 95(5):477–485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sahoo MR, Kumar A, Jaiswal S, Basavaraja C (2013) Transverse colon perforation due to carcinoma rectum: an unusual presentation against Laplace’s law. BMJ Case Rep 2013:bcr2013008561. https://doi.org/10.1136/bcr-2013-008561

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Davis L, Lowman RM (1956) An evaluation of cecal size in impending perforation of the cecum. Surg Gynecol Obstet 103(6):711–718

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gierson ED, Storm FK, Shaw W, Coyne SK (1975) Caecal rupture due to colonic ileus. Br J Surg 62(5):383–386

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Johnson CD, Rice RP, Kelvin FM, Foster WL, Williford ME (1985) The radiologic evaluation of gross cecal distension: emphasis on cecal ileus. AJR Am J Roentgenol 145(6):1211–1217

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kottler RE, Lee GK (1984) The threatened caecum in acute large-bowel obstruction. Br J Radiol 57(683):989–990

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Taourel P, Garibaldi F, Arrigoni J, Le Guen V, Lesnik A, Bruel JM (2004) Cecal pneumatosis in patients with obstructive colon cancer: correlation of CT findings with bowel viability. Am J Roentgenol 183(6):1667–1671

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. El-Amin LC, Levine MS, Rubesin SE, Shah JN, Kochman ML, Laufer I (2003) Ileocecal valve: spectrum of normal findings at double-contrast barium enema examination. Radiology 227(1):52–58

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kumar D, Phillips SF (1987) The contribution of external ligamentous attachments to function of the ileocecal junction. Dis Colon Rectum 30(6):410–416

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Krajewski K, Siewert B, Eisenberg RL (2009) Colonic dilation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193(5):W363–W372

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiology, Besançon University Hospital, 3 boulevard Fleming, 25030, Besançon, France

    Alexandre Orbion, Abdellah Mouman, Julien Behr, Paul Calame & Eric Delabrousse

  2. Department of Digestive Surgery, Besançon University Hospital, 3 boulevard Fleming, 25030, Besançon, France

    Zaher Lakkis

  3. EA 4662 Nanomedicine Lab, Imagery and Therapeutics, University of Bourgogne Franche-Comté, Besançon, France

    Eric Delabrousse

  4. Service de Radiologie Viscérale, CHRU Besançon, Hôpital Jean Minjoz, 3 Boulevard Fleming, 25030, Besançon, France

    Eric Delabrousse

Authors
  1. Alexandre Orbion
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Abdellah Mouman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Julien Behr
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Zaher Lakkis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Paul Calame
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Eric Delabrousse
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eric Delabrousse.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Orbion, A., Mouman, A., Behr, J. et al. Correlation between a continent ileocecal valve and CT signs of severity in patients presenting with obstructive colonic cancer. Emerg Radiol 26, 277–282 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-018-01667-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-018-01667-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation