Skip to main content
Log in

Safety incident reporting in emergency radiology: analysis of 1717 safety incident reports

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Emergency Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this article is to describe the incidence and types of safety reports logged in the radiology safety incident reporting system in our emergency radiology section over an 8-year period. Electronic incident reporting system of our institute was searched for the variables in emergency radiology. All reports from April 2006 to June 2014 were included and deindentified. The following event classifications were investigated in radiography, CT, and MRI modalities: diagnostic test orders, ID/documentation/consent, safety/security/conduct, service coordination, surgery/procedure, line/tube, fall, medication/IV safety, employee general incident, environment/equipment, adverse drug reaction, skin/tissue, and diagnosis/treatment. A total of 881,194 emergency radiology examinations were performed during the study period, 1717 (1717/881,194 = 0.19 %) of which resulted in safety reports. Reports were classified into 14 different categories, the most frequent of which were “diagnostic test orders” (481/1717 = 28 % total incident reports), “medication/IV safety” (302/1717 = 18 % total incident reports), and “service coordination” (204/1717 = 12 % total incident reports). X-ray had the highest report rate (873/1717 = 50 % total incident reports), followed by CT (604/1717 = 35 % total incident reports) and MRI (240/1717 = 14 % total incident reports). Forty-six percent of safety incidents (789/1717) caused no harm and did not reach the patient, 36 % (617/1717) caused no harm but reached the patient, 18 % (308/1717) caused temporary or minor harm/ damage, and less than 1 % caused permanent or major harm/ damage or death. Our study shows an overall safety incident report rate of 0.19 % in emergency radiology including radiography, CT, and MRI modalities. The most common safety incidents were diagnostic test orders, medication/IV safety, and service coordination.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. WHO. More than words: Conceptual framework for the international classification for patient safety; final technical report; 2009. Available at: http://www.who.int/patientsafety/taxonomy/icps_full_report.pdf

  2. Jones DN, Benveniste KA, Schultz TJ, Mandel CJ, Runciman WB (2010) Establishing National Medical Imaging Incident Reporting Systems: issues and challenges. J Am Coll Radiol 7:582–592

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Vinen J (2000) Incident monitoring in emergency departments: an Australian model. Acad Emerg Med 7(11):1290–7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Källberg AS, Göransson KE, Östergren J, Florin J, Ehrenberg A (2013) Medical errors and complaints in emergency department care in Sweden as reported by care providers, healthcare staff, and patients – a national review. Eur J Emerg Med 20(1):33–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Vinen J (2000) Incident monitoring in emergency departments: an Australian model. Acad Emerg Med 7(11):1290–7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hunt C, Hartman P (2009) Frequency and severity of adverse effects of iodinated and gadolinium contrast materials: retrospective review of 456,930 doses. AJR 193(4):1124–1127

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Abujudeh HH, Kosaraju VK, Kaewlai R (2010) Acute adverse reactions to gadopentetate dimeglumine and gadobenate dimeglumine: experience with 32,659 injections. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194(2):430–4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang C, Cohen R (2008) Frequency, outcome, and appropriateness of treatment of nonionic iodinated contrast media reactions. AJR 191(2):409–415

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Applying the universal protocol to improve patient safety in radiology. Pa Patient Saf Advis 2011 Jun;8(2):63 URL: http://patientsafetyauthority.org/ADVISORIES/AdvisoryLibrary/2011/jun8%282%29/Pages/63.aspx Accessed on 5/25/2015

  10. Schultz S, Watson R, Prescott S et al (2011) Patient safety event reporting in a large radiology department. AJR Am J of Roentgenol 197:684–688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Morishita J, Watanabe H, Katsuragawa S et al (2005) Investigation of misfiled cases in the PACS environment and a solution to prevent filing errors for chest radiographs. Acad Radiol 12:97–103

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Katayama H, Yamaguchi K, Kozuka T et al (1990) Adverse reactions to ionic and nonionic contrast media. A report from the Japanese Committee on the Safety of Contrast Media. Radiology 175(3):621–8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Li X, Chen J, Zhang L et al (2015) Clinical observation of the adverse drug reactions caused by non-ionic iodinated contrast media: results from 109,255 cases who underwent enhanced CT examination in Chongqing. China Br J Radiol 88(1047):20140491

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Shaqdan K, Aran S, Thrall J, Abujudeh H (2014) Incidence of contrast medium extravasation for CT and MRI in a large academic medical centre: a report on 502,391 injections. Clin Radiol 69(12):1264–72

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Dykes TM, Bhargavan-Chatfield M, Dyer RB (2015) Intravenous contrast extravasation during CT: a national data registry and practice quality improvement initiative. J Am Coll Radiol 12(2):183–91

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kingston RJ, Young N, Sindhusake DP, Truong M (2012) Study of patients with intravenous contrast extravasation on CT studies, with radiology staff and ward staff cannulations. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 56(2):163–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hardie AD, Kereshi B (2014) Incidence of intravenous contrast extravasation: increased risk for patients with deep brachial catheter placement from the emergency department. Emerg Radiol 21(3):235–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. http://patientsafetyauthority.org/Pages/Default.aspx. Accessed on 5/20/2015

  19. Abujudeh HH, Aran S, Daftari Besheli L, Miguel K, Halpern E (2014) Thrall JHOutpatient Falls Prevention Program Outcome: An Increase, a Plateau, and a Decrease in Incident Reports. AJR Am J Roentgenol 203(3):620–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Abujudeh H, Kaewlai R, Shah B, Thrall J (2011) Characteristics of falls in a large academic radiology department: occurrence, associated factors, outcomes, and quality improvement strategies. AJR Am J Roentgenol 197(1):154–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

Corresponding author is receiving book royalties. The other authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hani H. Abujudeh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mansouri, M., Shaqdan, K.W., Aran, S. et al. Safety incident reporting in emergency radiology: analysis of 1717 safety incident reports. Emerg Radiol 22, 623–630 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-015-1336-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-015-1336-3

Keywords

Navigation