Skip to main content
Log in

Diagnostic performance of CT esophagography in patients with suspected esophageal rupture

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Emergency Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Esophageal rupture is a surgical catastrophe. The gold standard for diagnosing is iodine, water-soluble contrast medium esophagography. CT esophagography has shown promising results. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of CT esophagography in patients with a suspicion of esophageal rupture. This prospective study assessed the performance of a diagnostic test and was approved by local IRB committee. Patients who presented with a clinical suspicion of esophageal rupture were included. CT esophagography findings were described by the emergency radiologist. Clinical outcomes (presence or absence of esophageal rupture) were reported by surgeons. The operative characteristics were calculated. A final predictive scale for rupture was built. A total of 64 patients were recruited (age 26.5 years, 90 % male, 82 % trauma). Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative likelihood ratios (LRs) were 77.7 % (95 % confidence interval (CI) 45–100), 94.3 % (87.2–100), 14 (9.81–19.9), and 0.24 (0.05–1.22), respectively. The final model for predicting rupture included five variables: age (odds ratio (OR) 1.03; 95 % CI, 0.95–1.11; p = 0.04), leakage of contrast media into the mediastinum or pleural space (OR 10.0; 95 % CI, 0.64–156.9; p = 0.10), extraluminal air or fluid collections (OR 43.1; 95 % CI, 1.52–1217.3; p = 0.027), esophageal wall thickening (OR 10.1; 95 % CI, 0.50–202.8; p = 0.12), and left pneumothorax or pleural effusion (OR 6.5; 95 % CI, 0.31–132.7; p = 0.2). The overall agreement was 0.40 (95 % CI, 0.09–0.72) for the predictive model. The model sensitivity was 50.0 %, and the specificity was 98.4 %. CT esophagography shows a good diagnostic performance in patients with a suspected esophageal rupture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Vogel SB, Rout WR, Martin TD et al (2005) Esophageal perforation in adults: aggressive, conservative treatment lowers morbidity and mortality. Ann Surg 241:1016–1021

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Kiernan PD, Sheridan MJ, Elster E et al (2003) Thoracic esophageal perforations. South Med J 96:158–163

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. de Lutio di Castelguidone E, Merola S, Pinto A et al (2006) Esophageal injuries: spectrum of multidetector row CT findings. Eur J Radiol 59:344–348

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Backer CL, LoCicero J III, Hartz RS et al (1990) Computed tomography in patients with esophageal perforation. Chest 98:1078–1080

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Flynn AE, Verrier ED, Way LW et al (1989) Esophageal perforation. Arch Surg 124:1211–1214

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Rubesin SE, Levine MS (2003) Radiologic diagnosis of gastrointestinal perforation. Radiol Clin N Am 41:1095–1115, v

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fadoo F, Ruiz DE, Dawn SK et al (2004) Helical CT esophagography for the evaluation of suspected esophageal perforation or rupture. AJR Am J Roentgenol 182:1177–1179

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. White CS, Templeton PA, Attar S (1993) Esophageal perforation: CT findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 160:767–770

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. MACKLER SA (1952) Spontaneous rupture of the esophagus; an experimental and clinical study. Surg Gynecol Obstet 95:345–356

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kim SH, Kim YJ, Lee JM et al (2007) Esophageal varices in patients with cirrhosis: multidetector CT esophagography—comparison with endoscopy. Radiology 242:759–768

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Brick SH, Caroline DF, Lev-Toaff AS et al (1988) Esophageal disruption: evaluation with iohexol esophagography. Radiology 169:141–1-43

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tatiana Suarez-Poveda.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Suarez-Poveda, T., Morales-Uribe, C.H., Sanabria, A. et al. Diagnostic performance of CT esophagography in patients with suspected esophageal rupture. Emerg Radiol 21, 505–510 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-014-1222-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-014-1222-4

Keywords

Navigation