Skip to main content
Log in

Significance of size and location of appendicoliths as exacerbating factor of acute appendicitis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Emergency Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to investigate the significance of appendicoliths as an exacerbating factor of acute appendicitis using multivariate analysis. A total of 254 patients with pathologically proved acute appendicitis were enrolled in this retrospective study (male, 51 %; mean age, 40.1 years; range, 15–91 years). Two radiologists performed a consensus evaluation of preoperative CT images for the presence of appendicoliths in consensus. When there were appendicoliths, they assessed the number and location of appendicoliths, and measured the longest diameter of the largest appendicolith. Pathological diagnosis was used for the reference standard. The relationships of appendicoliths to gangrenous appendicitis and to perforated appendicitis were each assessed with multiple logistic regression models, which were adjusted for demographic and clinical characteristics of patients. Significant relationships were identified between gangrenous appendicitis and the presence of appendicoliths (OR, 2.2; 95 % CI, 1.2–4.0), the largest appendicolith more than 5 mm in the longest (OR, 3.0; 95 % CI, 1.6–5.7), and location of an appendicolith at the root of the appendix (OR, 2.0; 95 % CI, 1.1–3.8). Among the CT characteristics, the location of an appendicolith at the root of the appendix only showed significant relationship with perforated appendicitis (OR, 4.5; 95 % CI, 1.4–15.4). Size of the largest appendicolith and location of appendicoliths at the root of the appendix are exacerbating factors of acute appendicitis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Horrow MM, White DS, Horrow JC (2003) Differentiation of perforated from nonperforated appendicitis at CT. Radiology 227:46–51

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Foley TA, Earnest F 4th, Nathan MA, Hough DM, Schiller HJ, Hoskin TL (2005) Differentiation of nonperforated from perforated appendicitis: accuracy of CT diagnosis and relationship of CT findings to length of hospital stay. Radiology 235:89–96

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bixby SD, Lucey BC, Soto JA, Theysohn JM, Ozonoff A, Varghese JC (2006) Perforated versus nonperforated acute appendicitis: accuracy of multidetector CT detection. Radiology 241:780–786

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Tsuboi M, Takase K, Kaneda I et al (2008) Perforated and nonperforated appendicitis: defect in enhancing appendiceal wall–depiction with multi-detector row CT. Radiology 246:142–147

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Moteki T, Horikoshi H (2007) New CT criterion for acute appendicitis: maximum depth of intraluminal appendiceal fluid. AJR Am J Roentgenol 188:1313–1319

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Yeung KW, Chang MS, Hsiao CP (2004) Evaluation of perforated and nonperforated appendicitis with CT. Clin Imaging 28:422–427

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lai V, Chan WC, Lau HY, Yeung TW, Wong YC, Yuen MK (2012) Diagnostic power of various computed tomography signs in diagnosing acute appendicitis. Clin Imaging 36:29–34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Raja AS, Wright C, Sodickson AD et al (2010) Negative appendectomy rate in the era of CT: an 18-year perspective. Radiology 256:460–465

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cabarrus M, Sun YL, Courtier JL et al. (2012) The prevalence and patterns of intraluminal air in acute appendicitis at CT. Emergency Radiology Sep 21. [Epub ahead of print]

  10. Vons C, Barry C, Maitre S et al (2011) Amoxicillin plus clavulanic acid versus appendicectomy for treatment of acute uncomplicated appendicitis: an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 377:1573–1579

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Varadhan KK, Neal KR, Lobo DN (2012) Safety and efficacy of antibiotics compared with appendicectomy for treatment of uncomplicated acute appendicitis: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ 344:e2156

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Varadhan KK, Humes DJ, Neal KR, Lobo DN (2010) Antibiotic therapy versus appendectomy for acute appendicitis: a meta-analysis. World J Surg 34:199–209

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Simillis C, Symeonides P, Shorthouse AJ, Tekkis PP (2010) A meta-analysis comparing conservative treatment versus acute appendectomy for complicated appendicitis (abscess or phlegmon). Surgery 147:818–829

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Konstantinidis KM, Anastasakou KA, Vorias MN, Sambalis GH, Georgiou MK, Xiarchos AG (2008) A decade of laparoscopic appendectomy: presentation of 1,026 patients with suspected appendicitis treated in a single surgical department. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 18:248–258

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ein SH, Langer JC, Daneman A (2005) Nonoperative management of pediatric ruptured appendix with inflammatory mass or abscess: presence of an appendicolith predicts recurrent appendicitis. J Pediatr Surg 40:1612–1615

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kondo NI, Kohno H (2009) Retained appendicolith in an inflamed appendix. Emerg Radiol 16:105–109

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Shindoh J, Niwa H, Kawai K et al (2010) Predictive factors for negative outcomes in initial non-operative management of suspected appendicitis. J Gastrointest Surg 14:309–314

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mitsutomi Ishiyama.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ishiyama, M., Yanase, F., Taketa, T. et al. Significance of size and location of appendicoliths as exacerbating factor of acute appendicitis. Emerg Radiol 20, 125–130 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-012-1093-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-012-1093-5

Keywords

Navigation