Abstract
The aim of the present study was to investigate the significance of appendicoliths as an exacerbating factor of acute appendicitis using multivariate analysis. A total of 254 patients with pathologically proved acute appendicitis were enrolled in this retrospective study (male, 51 %; mean age, 40.1 years; range, 15–91 years). Two radiologists performed a consensus evaluation of preoperative CT images for the presence of appendicoliths in consensus. When there were appendicoliths, they assessed the number and location of appendicoliths, and measured the longest diameter of the largest appendicolith. Pathological diagnosis was used for the reference standard. The relationships of appendicoliths to gangrenous appendicitis and to perforated appendicitis were each assessed with multiple logistic regression models, which were adjusted for demographic and clinical characteristics of patients. Significant relationships were identified between gangrenous appendicitis and the presence of appendicoliths (OR, 2.2; 95 % CI, 1.2–4.0), the largest appendicolith more than 5 mm in the longest (OR, 3.0; 95 % CI, 1.6–5.7), and location of an appendicolith at the root of the appendix (OR, 2.0; 95 % CI, 1.1–3.8). Among the CT characteristics, the location of an appendicolith at the root of the appendix only showed significant relationship with perforated appendicitis (OR, 4.5; 95 % CI, 1.4–15.4). Size of the largest appendicolith and location of appendicoliths at the root of the appendix are exacerbating factors of acute appendicitis.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Horrow MM, White DS, Horrow JC (2003) Differentiation of perforated from nonperforated appendicitis at CT. Radiology 227:46–51
Foley TA, Earnest F 4th, Nathan MA, Hough DM, Schiller HJ, Hoskin TL (2005) Differentiation of nonperforated from perforated appendicitis: accuracy of CT diagnosis and relationship of CT findings to length of hospital stay. Radiology 235:89–96
Bixby SD, Lucey BC, Soto JA, Theysohn JM, Ozonoff A, Varghese JC (2006) Perforated versus nonperforated acute appendicitis: accuracy of multidetector CT detection. Radiology 241:780–786
Tsuboi M, Takase K, Kaneda I et al (2008) Perforated and nonperforated appendicitis: defect in enhancing appendiceal wall–depiction with multi-detector row CT. Radiology 246:142–147
Moteki T, Horikoshi H (2007) New CT criterion for acute appendicitis: maximum depth of intraluminal appendiceal fluid. AJR Am J Roentgenol 188:1313–1319
Yeung KW, Chang MS, Hsiao CP (2004) Evaluation of perforated and nonperforated appendicitis with CT. Clin Imaging 28:422–427
Lai V, Chan WC, Lau HY, Yeung TW, Wong YC, Yuen MK (2012) Diagnostic power of various computed tomography signs in diagnosing acute appendicitis. Clin Imaging 36:29–34
Raja AS, Wright C, Sodickson AD et al (2010) Negative appendectomy rate in the era of CT: an 18-year perspective. Radiology 256:460–465
Cabarrus M, Sun YL, Courtier JL et al. (2012) The prevalence and patterns of intraluminal air in acute appendicitis at CT. Emergency Radiology Sep 21. [Epub ahead of print]
Vons C, Barry C, Maitre S et al (2011) Amoxicillin plus clavulanic acid versus appendicectomy for treatment of acute uncomplicated appendicitis: an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 377:1573–1579
Varadhan KK, Neal KR, Lobo DN (2012) Safety and efficacy of antibiotics compared with appendicectomy for treatment of uncomplicated acute appendicitis: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ 344:e2156
Varadhan KK, Humes DJ, Neal KR, Lobo DN (2010) Antibiotic therapy versus appendectomy for acute appendicitis: a meta-analysis. World J Surg 34:199–209
Simillis C, Symeonides P, Shorthouse AJ, Tekkis PP (2010) A meta-analysis comparing conservative treatment versus acute appendectomy for complicated appendicitis (abscess or phlegmon). Surgery 147:818–829
Konstantinidis KM, Anastasakou KA, Vorias MN, Sambalis GH, Georgiou MK, Xiarchos AG (2008) A decade of laparoscopic appendectomy: presentation of 1,026 patients with suspected appendicitis treated in a single surgical department. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 18:248–258
Ein SH, Langer JC, Daneman A (2005) Nonoperative management of pediatric ruptured appendix with inflammatory mass or abscess: presence of an appendicolith predicts recurrent appendicitis. J Pediatr Surg 40:1612–1615
Kondo NI, Kohno H (2009) Retained appendicolith in an inflamed appendix. Emerg Radiol 16:105–109
Shindoh J, Niwa H, Kawai K et al (2010) Predictive factors for negative outcomes in initial non-operative management of suspected appendicitis. J Gastrointest Surg 14:309–314
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ishiyama, M., Yanase, F., Taketa, T. et al. Significance of size and location of appendicoliths as exacerbating factor of acute appendicitis. Emerg Radiol 20, 125–130 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-012-1093-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-012-1093-5