Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The accuracy of focused abdominal CT in patients presenting to the emergency department

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Emergency Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Focused computed tomography(CT) examination (FCT) is CT limited to a specific abdominal area in an attempt to reduce radiation exposure. We wanted to evaluate FCT on the basis of information from the request form and thus reduce radiation dose to the patient without missing relevant findings. We retrospectively analyzed 189 consecutive acute abdominal CT, dividing the findings as localized in the upper or lower abdomen. Another researcher blindly determined where the CT should be focused to, based only on information provided in the request form. The sensitivity and specificity of FCT in patients with symptoms from only upper abdomen was 100%. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of FCT in patients with symptom from only lower abdomen were 79%, 100%, and 92%, respectively. Our study suggests that among patients with symptoms from the lower abdomen, not examining the upper abdomen would lead to missing relevant findings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Duan SY, Zhang DT, Lin QC, Wu YH (2006) Clinical value of CT three-dimensional imaging in diagnosing gastrointestinal tract diseases. World J Gastroenterol 12(18):2945–2948

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Male RS, Bronskill MJ, Rideout DF, Blend R, Herman S, Poon PY (1983) Efficacy of computed tomography in the management of cancer patients. Cancer 52(9):1604–1608. doi:10.1002/1097-0142(19831101)52:9<1604::AID-CNCR2820520911>3.0.CO;2-Z

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Male RS, Rideout DF, Bronskill MJ (1980) Evaluation of computed tomography in oncology. J Can Assoc Radiol 31(4):246–250

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Doria AS, Amernic H, Dick P, Babyn P, Chait P, Langer J, Coyte PC, Ungar WJ (2005) Cost-effectiveness analysis of weekday and weeknight or weekend shifts for assessment of appendicitis. Pediatr Radiol 35(12):1186–1195. doi:10.1007/s00247-005-1570-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Shrimpton PC, Hillier MC, Lewis MA, Dunn M (2006) National survey of doses from CT in the UK: 2003. Br J Radiol 79(948):968–980. doi:10.1259/bjr/93277434

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ware DE, Huda W, Mergo PJ, Litwiller AL (1999) Radiation effective doses to patients undergoing abdominal CT examinations. Radiology 210(3):645–650

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Jimenez S, Jimenez JR, Crespo M, Santamarta E, Bousono C, Rodriguez J (2006) Computed tomography in children with cystic fibrosis: a new way to reduce radiation dose. Arch Dis Child 91(5):388–390. doi:10.1136/adc.2005.077842

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Katz SI, Saluja S, Brink JA, Forman HP (2006) Radiation dose associated with unenhanced CT for suspected renal colic: impact of repetitive studies. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186(4):1120–1124. doi:10.2214/AJR.04.1838

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fefferman NR, Roche KJ, Pinkney LP, Ambrosino MM, Genieser NB (2001) Suspected appendicitis in children: focused CT technique for evaluation. Radiology 220:691–695. doi:10.1148/radiol.2203001826

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Rhea JT, Rao PM, Novelline RA, McCabe CJ (1997) A focused appendiceal CT technique to reduce the cost of caring for patients with clinically suspected appendicitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 169:113–118

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Rao PM, Rhea JT, Novelline RA, McCabe CJ, Lawrason JN, Berger DL, Sacknoff R (1997) Helical CT technique for the diagnosis of appendicitis: prospective evaluation of a focused appendix CT examination. Radiology 202:139–144

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kamel IR, Goldberg SN, Keogan MT, Rosen MP, Raptopoulos V (2000) Right lower quadrant pain and suspected appendicitis: nonfocused appendiceal CT—review of 100 cases. Radiology 217:159–163

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Louizos AA, Hadzilia SJ, Leandros E, Kouroukli IK, Georgiou LG, Bramis JP (2005) Postoperative pain relief after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a placebo-controlled double-blind randomized trial of preincisional infiltration and intraperitoneal instillation of levobupivacaine 0.25%. Surg Endosc 19(11):1503–1506. doi:10.1007/s00464-005-3002-4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Demco LA (2000) Pain referral patterns in the pelvis. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 7(2):181–183. doi:10.1016/S1074-3804(00)80037-7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Cody DD, Moxley DM, Krugh KT, O’Daniel JC, Wagner LK, Eftekhari F (2004) Strategies for formulating appropriate MDCT techniques when imaging the chest, abdomen, and pelvis in pediatric patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 182(4):849–859

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lundy JB, Edwards KD, Parker DM, Rivera DE (2006) Recurrent rectal diverticulitis. Am Surg 72(7):633–636

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Patel NA, Bergamaschi R (2003) Laparoscopy for diverticulitis. Semin Laparosc Surg 10(4):177–183

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Chintapalli KN, Chopra S, Ghiatas AA, Esola CC, Fields SF, Dodd GD 3rd (1999) Diverticulitis versus colon cancer: differentiation with helical CT findings. Radiology 210(2):429–435

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Johnson CD, Stephens DH (1989) Computed tomography of the large bowel and appendix. Mayo Clin Proc 64(10):1276–1283

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Fante R, Benatti P, di Gregorio C, De Pietri S, Pedroni M, Tamassia MG, Percesepe A, Rossi G, Losi L, Roncucci L et al (1997) Colorectal carcinoma in different age groups: a population-based investigation. Am J Gastroenterol 92(9):1505–1509

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Gurleyik G, Gurleyik E (2003) Age-related clinical features in older patients with acute appendicitis. Eur J Emerg Med 10(3):200–203. doi:10.1097/00063110-200309000-00008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kaiser S, Finnbogason T, Jorulf HK, Soderman E, Frenckner B (2004) Suspected appendicitis in children: diagnosis with contrast-enhanced versus non enhanced Helical CT. Radiology 231(2):427–433. doi:10.1148/radiol.2312030240

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Wijetunga R, Tan BS, Rouse JC, Bigg-Wither GW, Doust BD (2001) Diagnostic accuracy of focused appendiceal CT in clinically equivocal cases of acute appendicitis. Radiology 221(3):747–753. doi:10.1148/radiol.2213001581

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ali Latifi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Latifi, A., Torkzad, O., Labruto, F. et al. The accuracy of focused abdominal CT in patients presenting to the emergency department. Emerg Radiol 16, 209–215 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-008-0775-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-008-0775-5

Keywords

Navigation