Abstract
The first objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that a lower-dose (14.1 mGy thyroid dose) protocol for helical computed tomography (CT) of the entire cervical spine demonstrates equivalent technical adequacy and diagnostic accuracy as the standard-dose protocol (26.0 mGy thyroid dose) used at our institution. The second objective was to estimate the excess thyroid cancer mortality for three cervical spine screening protocols. Eight patients underwent two helical CT acquisitions of the entire cervical spine (standard and lower dose); from these acquisitions, a database of 128 randomized images (64 standard dose and 64 lower dose) was constructed. Three radiologists evaluated each of the 128 images for technical adequacy and, if the image was technically adequate, diagnostic accuracy. Historical data of excess thyroid cancer mortality stratified by age and sex were used to estimate the impact of lowering the thyroid dose in cervical spine screening. Estimates used a linear extrapolation of mortality data. The lower-dose protocol for helical CT of the entire cervical spine demonstrates equivalent technical adequacy and diagnostic accuracy as the standard protocol. The excess thyroid cancer mortality is a function of patient age and sex; for 25-year-old men, the excess mortality per 100,000 patients is 96.7 (standard-dose CT), 52.4 (lower-dose CT), and 6.7 (radiographs alone, 1.8 mGy thyroid dose). The equivalent technical adequacy and diagnostic accuracy of a lower-dose protocol for helical CT of the entire cervical spine support its implementation in routine screening. The excess thyroid mortality emphasizes the need to maintain an open dialogue with our referring clinicians with respect to the mechanism of injury, clinical findings, and radiation risks.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Nunez DB, Ahmad AA, Coin CG, LeBlang S, Becerra JL, Henry R (1994) Clearing the cervical spine in multiple trauma victims: a time-effective protocol using helical computed tomography. Emerg Radiol 1:273–278
Nunez DB Jr, Zuluaga A, Fuentes-Bernardo DA, Rivas LA, Becerra JL (1996) Cervical spine trauma: how much more do we learn by routinely using helical CT? Radiographics 16:1307–1318 (discussion 1318–1321)
Nunez DB Jr, Quencer RM (1998) The role of helical CT in the assessment of cervical spine injuries. AJR Am J Roentgenol 171:951–957
Rybicki FJ, Knoll B, McKenney K, Zou KH, Nunez DB (2000) Imaging of cervical spine trauma: are the anteroposterior and odontoid radiographs needed when CT of the entire cervical spine is routine? Emerg Radiol 7:352–355
Ptak T, Kihiczak D, Lawrason JN et al (2001) Screening for cervical spine trauma with helical CT: experience with 676 cases. Emerg Radiol 8:315–319
Lawrason JN, Novelline RA, Rhea JT, Sacknoff R, Kihiczak D, Ptak T (2001) Can CT eliminate the initial portable lateral cervical spine radiograph in the multiple trauma patient? A review of 200 cases. Emerg Radiol 8:272–275
Blackmore CC, Ramsey SD, Mann FA, Deyo RA (1999) Cervical spine screening with CT in trauma patients: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Radiology 212:117–125
Hanson JA, Blackmore CC, Mann FA, Wilson AJ (2000) Cervical spine injury: a clinical decision rule to identify high-risk patients for helical CT screening. AJR Am J Roentgenol 174:713–717
Rybicki F, Nawfel RD, Judy PF et al (2002) Skin and thyroid dosimetry in cervical spine screening: two methods for evaluation and a comparison between a helical CT and radiographic trauma series. AJR Am J Roentgenol 179:933–937
NCRP (1985) Induction of thyroid cancer by ionizing radiation (report no. 80). National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurement, Bethesda
Hancock SL, McDougall IR, Constine LS (1995) Thyroid abnormalities after therapeutic external radiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 31:1165–1170
International Commission on Radiological Protection (1991) 1990 Recommendations of the International Commission of Radiological Protection, ICRP Publication No. 60. Ann ICRP 21:1–3
Gofman JW, O’Connor E (1985) X-rays, health effects of common exams. Sierra Club, San Francisco
Vandemark RM (1990) Radiology of the cervical spine in trauma patients: practice pitfalls and recommendations for improving efficiency and communication. AJR Am J Roentgenol 155:465–472
Streitwieser DR, Knopp R, Wales LR, Williams JL, Tonnemacher K (1983) Accuracy of standard radiographic views in detecting cervical spine fractures. Ann Emerg Med 12:538–542
Blackmore CC, Deyo RA (1997) Specificity of cervical spine radiography: importance of clinical scenario. Emerg Radiol 4:283–286
Prasad SR, Wittram C, Shepard JA, McLoud T, Rhea J (2002) Standard-dose and 50%-reduced-dose chest CT: comparing the effect on image quality. AJR Am J Roentgenol 179:461–465
Hoffman JR, Mower WR, Wolfson AB, Todd KH, Zucker MI (2000) Validity of a set of clinical criteria to rule out injury to the cervical spine in patients with blunt trauma. N Engl J Med 343:94–99
Nguyen GK, Clark R (2005) Adequacy of plain radiography in the diagnosis of cervical spine injuries. Emerg Radiol 11:158–161
Mayo JR, Whittall KP, Leung AN et al (1997) Simulated dose reduction in conventional chest CT: validation study. Radiology 202:453–457
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shu, K.M., MacKenzie, J.D., Smith, J.B. et al. Lowering the thyroid dose in screening examinations of the cervical spine. Emerg Radiol 12, 133–136 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-005-0462-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-005-0462-8