Skip to main content
Log in

Occipital condyle fractures: clinical presentation and imaging findings in 76 patients

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Emergency Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim was to assess the frequency and type of occipital condyle fractures in patients with significant trauma, and determine the frequency in which conventional radiographic findings are positive. Secondarily, we subjectively evaluate the application of existing classification systems. Fracture of the occipital condyle is an uncommon lesion that may be associated with craniocervical instability. Relying on conventional radiographs to detect these injuries may be inappropriate. An institutional trauma database of patients was searched for patients with occipital condyle fractures. The types of fractures were classified retrospectively based on re-review of imaging studies, using existing classification systems. Frequency of types was calculated, and the ease of use of the fracture classifications was evaluated subjectively. Conventional radiographs were reviewed for the presence of subjective soft tissue swelling and the visibility of the fracture(s). Seventy-six patients had CT images available for re-review. None of the occipital condyle fractures could be identified in the 60 patients who had radiographs available for re-review. Because of the presence of life support tubing and pharyngeal fluid limiting evaluation of prevertebral soft tissue swelling, the presence of widened prevertebral soft tissues was only helpful in 7 of the 60 patients. The multiplanar reformatted CT images were useful to determine alignment at C0–C1 and C1–C2. Occipital condyle fractures were not visualized on conventional radiographs. Secondary findings of soft tissue swelling were often absent or unreliable. CT scanning with multiplanar reconstruction imaging plays an indispensable role in evaluating for fractures of the cervical spine, and for determining alignment at C0–C1–C2. The most recently developed classification system of Tuli et al. (Neurosurgery 41: 368–376, 1997) is useful, but suffers from the lack of a defined distinction between undisplaced (Type I, stable) and displaced (Type 2A, unstable) fracture fragments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Young WF, Rosenwasser RH, Getch C, Jallo J (1994) Diagnosis and management of occipital condyle fractures. Neurosurgery 34:257–261

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bloom AI, Neeman Z, Slasky BS, Floman Y, Milgrom M, Rivkind A, Bar-Ziv J (1997) Fracture of the occipital condyles and associated craniocervical ligament injury: incidence, CT imaging and implications. Clin Radiol 52:198–202

    Google Scholar 

  3. Leone A, Cerase A, Colosimo C, Lauro L, Puca A, Marano P (2000) Occipital condylar fractures: a review. Radiology 216:635–644

    Google Scholar 

  4. Clayman DA, Sykes CH, Vines FS (1994) Occipital condyle fractures: clinical presentation and radiologic detection. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 15:1309–1315

    Google Scholar 

  5. Anderson PA, Montesano PX (1988) Morphology and treatment of occipital condyle fractures. Spine 13:731–736

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mann FA, Cohen W (1994) Occipital condyle fracture: significance in the assessment of occipitoatlantal stability. AJR Am J Roentgenol 163:193–194

    Google Scholar 

  7. Tuli S, Tator CH, Fehlings MG et al (1997) Occipital condyle fractures. Neurosurgery 41:368–376

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hanson JA, Deliganis AV, Baxter AB, Cohen WA, Linnau KF, Wilson AJ, Mann FA (2002) Radiologic and clinical spectrum of occipital condyle fractures: retrospective review of 107 consecutive fractures in 95 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 178:1261–1268

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kihiczak D, Novelline RA, Lawrason JN, Ptak T, Rhea JT, Sacknoff R (2001) Should an MR scan be performed routinely after a normal clearance CT scan in the trauma patient? Experience with 59 cases. Emerg Radiol 8:276–278

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mann FA, Cohen W (1994) Occipital condyle fracture: significance in the assessment of occipitoatlantal stability. AJR Am J Roentgenol 163:193–194

    Google Scholar 

  11. Harris JH (2002) Missed cervical spinal cord injuries. J Trauma 53:392–393

    Google Scholar 

  12. Viccellio P, Simon H, Pressman BD, Shah MN, Mower WR, Hoffman JR; NEXUS Group (2001) A prospective multicenter study of cervical spine injury in children. Pediatrics 108:E20

    Google Scholar 

  13. Pfirrmann CW, Binkert CA, Zanetti M et al (2001) MR morphology of alar ligaments and occipitoatlantoaxial joints: study in 50 asymptomatic subjects. Radiology 218:133–137

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank neurosurgeon Joseph S. Cheng, MD for his helpful discussion.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joseph M. Aulino.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aulino, J.M., Tutt, L.K., Kaye, J.J. et al. Occipital condyle fractures: clinical presentation and imaging findings in 76 patients. Emerg Radiol 11, 342–347 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-005-0425-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-005-0425-0

Keywords

Navigation