Skip to main content
Log in

Rapid CT scan visualization of the appendix and early acute non-perforated appendicitis using an improved oral contrast method

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Emergency Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to optimize detection of the normal appendix in the clinical exclusion of acute nonperforated appendicitis using an improved and rapid method of bowel opacification in conjunction with the CT examination. A prospective evaluation of 100 consecutive patients, ranging from 13 to 50 years in age, was performed over a 4-month period using water-soluble oral contrast medium consisting of a fixed dose of diatrizoate salts administered as a prepared beverage in the emergency ward 50 min prior to performing a CT scan to evaluate clinical signs and symptoms of early acute appendicitis. The appendix was visualized in 84% (84 of 100) of patients, with a mean transit time of 50 min. The appendix filled with oral contrast medium in 89% (75 of 84) patients, and this sign was reliable in excluding appendicitis. In no instance did a contrast-filled appendix prove to represent appendicitis. The earliest signs of appendicitis were seen in 8% (8 of 100) patients. CT scan findings included absence of a contrast- or air-containing appendix with appendiceal thickening and infiltration of the periappendiceal mesenteric fat. CT scan utilizing a fixed dosage of orally administered water-soluble contrast containing diatrizoate salts, with a mean transit time of 50 min, provides a rapid and efficient means of visualizing the appendix in the clinical exclusion of appendicitis in the emergency setting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2a–c.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Scholer SJ, Pituch K, Orr DP (1996) Clinical outcomes of children with acute abdominal pain. Pediatrics 98:680–685

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Rothrock SG, Pagane J (2000) Acute appendicitis in children: emergency department diagnosis and management. Ann Emerg Med 36:39–51

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rao PM, Rhea JT, Novelline RA (1998) Effect of computed tomography of the appendix on treatment of patients and use of hospital resources. N Engl J Med 338:141–146

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mullins ME, Kircher MF, Ryan DP (2001) Evaluation of suspected appendicitis in children using limited helical CT and colonic contrast material. AJR Am J Roentgenol 176:37–41

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Siewert B, Raptopoulos VD, Mueller MF (1997) Impact of CT on diagnosis and management of acute abdomen in patients initially treated without surgery. AJR Am J Roentgenol 168:173–178

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Oliak D, Yamini D, Uidani VM (2000) Nonoperative management of perforated appendicitis without periappendicieal mass. Am J Surg 179:177–181

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Temple CL, Huchcroft SA, Temple WJ (1995) The natural history of appendicitis in adults: a prospective study. Ann Surg 221:278–281

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Stroman DL, Bayouth CV, Kuhn (1999) The role of computed tomography in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Am J Surg 178:485–489

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Balthazar EJ, Rofsky NM, Zucker R (1998) Appendicitis: the impact of computed tomography imaging on negative appendectomy and perforation rates. Gastroenterology 93:768–771

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Rao PM, Rhea JT, Rattner (1999) Introduction of appendiceal CT: impact on negative appendectomy and appendiceal perforation rates. Ann Surg 229:344–349

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Raptopoulos V, Katsou, Rosen MP (2003) Acute appendicitis: effect of increased use of CT on selecting patients earlier. Radiology 226:521–526

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Callahan MJ, Rodriguez DP, Taylor GA (2002) CT of appendicitis in children. Radiology 224:325–332

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Landis JR, Koch GC (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Funaki B, Grossbreutz SR, Funaki CN (1998) Using unenhanced helical CT with enteric contrast material for suspected appendicitis in patients treated at a community hospital. AJR Am J Roentgenol 171:997–1001

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kapote S, Nazareth HM, Bapat RD (1988) Barium perintonitis: a case report. J Postgrad Med 34:103–104

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Thomson SR, Fraser M, Stupp C (1994) Iatrogenic and accidental colonic injuries—what to do. Dis Colon Rectum 37:496–502

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Karanikas ID, Kakoulidis DD, Gouvas ZT (1997) Barium peritonitis: a rare complication of upper gastrointestinal contrast investigation. Postgrad Med J 73:297–298

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vincenzo Giuliano.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Giuliano, V., Giuliano, C., Pinto, F. et al. Rapid CT scan visualization of the appendix and early acute non-perforated appendicitis using an improved oral contrast method. Emergency Radiology 10, 235–237 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-003-0319-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-003-0319-y

Keywords

Navigation