Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Development, registration and commercialization of microbial pesticides for plant protection

  • Review Article
  • Published:
International Microbiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Plant protection against pathogens, pests and weeds has been progressively reoriented from a therapeutic approach to a rational use of pesticide chemicals in which consumer health and environmental preservation prevail over any other productive or economic considerations. Microbial pesticides are being introduced in this new scenario of crop protection and currently several beneficial microorganisms are the active ingredients of a new generation of microbial pesticides or the basis for many natural products of microbial origin. The development of a microbial pesticide requires several steps addressed to its isolation in pure culture and screening by means of efficacy bioassays performed in vitro, ex vivo, in vivo, or in pilot trials under real conditions of application (field, greenhouse, post-harvest). For the commercial delivery of a microbial pesticide, the biocontrol agent must be produced at an industrial scale (fermentation), preserved for storage and formulated by means of biocompatible additives to increase survival and to improve the application and stability of the final product. Despite the relative high number of patents for biopesticides, only a few of them have materialized in a register for agricultural use. The excessive specificity in most cases and biosafety or environmental concerns in others are major limiting factors. Non-target effects may be possible in particular cases, such as displacement of beneficial microorganisms, allergenicity, toxinogencity (production of secondary metabolites toxic to plants, animals, or humans), pathogenicity (to plants or animals) by the agent itself or due to contaminants, or horizontal gene transfer of these characteristics to non-target microorganisms. However, these non-target effects should not be evaluated in an absolute manner, but relative to chemical control or the absence of any control of the target disease (for example, toxins derived from the pathogen). Consumer concerns about live microbes due to emerging food-borne diseases and bioterrorism do not help to create a socially receptive environment to microbial pesticides. The future of microbial pesticides is not only in developing new active ingredients based on microorganisms beneficial to plants, but in producing self-protected plants (so-called plant-incorporated pesticides) by transforming agronomically high-value crop plants with genes from biological control agents

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1.  Agrios NG (1997) Plant pathology. Academic Press, San Diego

  2.  Andrews JH, Harris RF (2000) The ecology and biogeography of microorganisms on plant surfaces. Annu Rev Phytopathol 38:145–180

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3.  Backman PA, Wilson M, Murphy JF (1997) Bacteria for biological control of plant diseases. In: Rechcigl NA, Rechcigl JE (eds) Environmentally safe approaches to crop disease control. CRC/Lewis Press, Boca Raton, Fla., pp 95–109

  4.  Boland GJ, Kuykendall LD (1998) Plant–microbe interactions and biological control. Dekker, New York

  5.  Boyetchko S, Pedersen E, Punja Z, Reddy M (1998) Formulations of biopesticides. In: Hall FR, Barry JW (eds) Biopesticides: use and delivery. (Methods in biotechnology, vol 5) Humana Press, Totowa, N.J., pp 487–508

  6.  Chet I (1993) Biotechnology in plant disease control. Wiley–Liss, New York

  7.  Cook RJ (2000) Advances in plant health management in the 20th century. Annu Rev Phytopathol 38:95–116

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8.  Cook RJ, Baker KF (1983) The nature and practice of biological control of plant pathogens. APS, St Paul, Minn.

  9.  Dent DR, Walton MP (1997) Methods in ecological and agricultural entomology. CAB International, London

  10.  Ehlers RU, Niemann I, Hollmer S, Strauch O, Jende D, Shanmugasundaran M, Mehta UK, Easwaramoorthy S, Burnell A (2000) Mass production potential of the bacto-helminthic biocontrol complex Heterorhabditis indicaPhotorhabdus luminescens. Biocontr Sci Technol 10:607–616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11.  European Commission (2002) Monitoring of pesticide residues in products of plant origin in the European Union, Norway, Iceland and Liechtenstein. (Document SANCO/687/02) European Commission, Brussels

  12.  European Commission (2003) Overview of the state of main works in DG health and consumer protection E.1 with regard to the implementation of Directive 91/414/EEC. (Document SANCO/629/00) European Commission, Brussels

  13.  Fravel DR, Rhodes DJ, Larkin RP (1999) Production and commercialization of biocontrol products. In: Albajes R, Gullino LM, Lenteren JC van, Elad Y (eds) Integrated pest and disease management in greenhouse crops. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 365–376

  14.  Glazer AN, Nikaido H (1995) Microbial biotechnology. Freeman, New York

  15.  Gullino ML, Kuijpers LAM (1994) Social and political implications of managing plant diseases with restricted fungicides in Europe. Annu Rev Phytopathol 32:559–579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16.  Gutterson N (1990) Microbial fungicides: recent approaches to elucidating mechanisms. Crit Rev Biotechnol 10:69–91

    Google Scholar 

  17.  Hahn MG (1996) Microbial elicitors and their receptors in plants. Annu Rev Phytopathol 34:387–412

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18.  Hall FR, Barry JW (1995) Biorational pest control agents. American Chemical Society, Washington, D.C.

  19.  Harman GE (2000) Myths and dogma of biocontrol: changes in perceptions derived from research on Tricleoderma harzianum T-22. Plant Dis 84:377–393

    Google Scholar 

  20.  Hoitink HAJ, Boehm MJ (1999) Biocontrol within the context of soil microbial communities: a substrate-dependent phenomenon. Annu Rev Phytopathol 37:427–446

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21.  Jackson SJ, Leek R (1991) Microencapsulation and the food industry. Lebensm Wiss Technol 24:289–297

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22.  Jiménez-Díaz RM, Lamo de Espinosa J (1998) Sustainable agriculture (In Spanish). Mundi Prensa, Madrid

  23.  Jones DG (1993) Exploitation of microorganisms. Chapman Hall, London

  24.  KEMI (1998) Microbiological plant protection products—workshop on the scientific basis for risk assessment. National Chemicals Inspectorate of Sweden, Stockholm

  25.  Kerry BR (2000) Rhizosphere interactions and the exploitation of microbial agents for the biological control of plant–parasitic nematodes. Annu Rev Phytopathol 38 423–441

    Google Scholar 

  26.  Knight SC, Anthony VM, Brady AM, Greenland AJ, Heaney SP, Murray DC, Powell KA, Schulz MA, Spinks CA, Worthington PA, Youle D (1997) Rationale and perspectives on the development of fungicides. Annu Rev Phytopathol 35:349–372

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27.  Lewis WJ, Leuteren JC van, Phatak SC, Tumlinson JH III (1997) A total system approach to sustainable pest management. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:12243–12248

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28.  Lindow SE, Hecht-Poinar EA, Elliot VJ (2002) Phyllosphere microbiology. APS Press, Saint Paul, Minn.

  29.  Lorito M, Scala F (1999) Microbial genes expressed in transgenic plants to improve disease resistance. J Plant Pathol 81:73–88

    Google Scholar 

  30.  Louws FJ, Rademaker JLW, Bruijn FJ de (1999) The three Ds of PCR-based genomic analysis of phytobacteria: diversity, detection, and disease diagnosis. Annu Rev Phytopathol 37:81–125

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31.  Maddox JV (1994) Insect pathogens as biological control agents. In: Metcalf RL, Luckmann WH (eds) Introduction to insect pest management. Wiley, New York

  32.  Mathre DE, Cook RJ, Callan NW (1999) From discovery to use: traversing the world of commercializing biocontrol agents for plant disease control. Plant Dis 83:972–983

    Google Scholar 

  33.  McSpadden BB, Fravel D (2002) Biological control of plant pathogens: research, commercialization, and application in the USA. Plant Health Progress, Washington, D.C. (www.plantmanagmentnetwork.org/php/)

    Google Scholar 

  34.  Montesinos E, Bonaterra A (1996) Dose-response models in biological control of plant pathogens. An empirical verification. Phytopathology 86:464–472

    Google Scholar 

  35.  Oerke EC, Dehne HW, Shoenbeck F, Weber A (1994) Estimated losses in major food and cash crops. Elsevier, London

  36.  Paulitz TC, Bélanger RB (2001) Biological control in greenhouse systems. Annu Rev Phytopathol 39:103–133

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37.  Powell KA, Jutsum AR (1993) Technical and commercial aspects of bicontrol products. J Pestic Sci 37:315–321

    Google Scholar 

  38.  Ragsdale NN, Sisler HD (1994) Social and political implications of managing plant diseases with decreased availability of fungicides in the United States. Annu Rev Phytopathol 32:545–557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39.  Rodríguez-Kábana R, Canullo GH (1992) Cropping systems for the management of phytonematodes. Phytoparasitica 20:211–224

    Google Scholar 

  40.  Schena L, Ippolito A, Zahavi T, Droby S (2000) Molecular approaches to assist the screening and monitoring of post-harvest biocontrol yeasts. Eur J Plant Pathol 106:681–691

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  41.  Stirling GR (1991) Biological control of plant parasitic nematodes: progress, problems and prospects. CAB International, Wallingford

    Google Scholar 

  42.  Wilson M, Backman PA (1998) Biological control of plant pathogens. In: Ruberson JR (ed) Handbook of pest management. Dekker, New York, pp 325–331

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emilio Montesinos.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Montesinos, E. Development, registration and commercialization of microbial pesticides for plant protection. Int Microbiol 6, 245–252 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10123-003-0144-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10123-003-0144-x

Keywords

Navigation