Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Livelihoods and landscapes at the threshold of change: disaster and resilience in a Chiapas coffee community

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Regional Environmental Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In 2005, torrential rains associated with Hurricane Stan devastated farm systems in southern Mexico. We present a case study on the impacts of and responses to Hurricane Stan by coffee households in three communities in the highlands of Chiapas, Mexico, with the objective of illuminating the linkages between household vulnerability and resilience. We analyze data from 64 household surveys in a cluster analysis to link household impacts experienced to post-Stan adaptive responses and relate these results with landscape-level land-cover changes. The degree of livelihood change was most significant for land-constrained households whose specialization in coffee led to high exposure and sensitivity to Stan and little adaptive capacity. Across the sample, the role of coffee in livelihood strategies declined, as households sought land to secure subsistence needs and diversified economically after Stan. Nevertheless, livelihoods and landscape outcomes were not closely coupled, at least at the temporal and spatial scale of our analysis: We found no evidence of land-use change associated with farmers’ coping strategies. While households held strong attitudes regarding effective resource management for risk reduction, this knowledge does not necessarily translate into capacities to manage resilience at broader scales. We argue that policy interventions are needed to help materialize local strategies and knowledge on risk management, not only to allow individual survival but also to enhance resilience at local, community and landscape scales.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Access to communities for research in Chiapas requires that the researchers have time to develop the necessary trust and collaborative relationships with community members. Because the focus of this research was on a specific disaster event, timeliness was of essence. We thus selected communities for our research that had been significantly affected by the event (as reported in official statistics) and where prior research activities permitted access.

  2. Measured in PASW 18 as follows BIC i  = −2 ln(L i ) + k i  ln(n)where n is the sample size; k i is the number of parameters in model i; and ln(L i ) is the maximized value of the likelihood function for the estimated model i.

  3. While there was an increase in the number of households declaring ‘agricultural day labor’ to be their primary source of income in the medium impact class, overall participation in this form of income actually declined across all the households in this group.

References

  • Adger WN, Hughes TP, Folke C, Carpenter SR, Rockstrom J (2005) Social-ecological resilience to coastal disasters. Science 309:1036–1039

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • AMECAFE (2006) Plan Rector de la Cafeticultura Nacional. Asociación Mexicana del Sistema-producto Café A.C. (AMECAFE) and Gobierno Federal de México, Mexico, DF

  • Bennett EM, Peterson GD, Gordon LJ (2009) Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services. Ecol Lett 12:1394–1404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkes F (2007) Understanding uncertainty and reducing vulnerability: lessons from resilience thinking. Nat Hazards 41:283–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkes F, Jolly D (2001) Adapting to climate change: social-ecological resilience in a Canadian western Artic community. Conserv Ecol 5(2):18

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkes F, Colding J, Folke C (2003) Navigating social-ecological systems: building resilience for complexity and change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Caballero L, Macías JL, García-Palomo A, Saucedo GR, Borselli L, Sarochhi D, Sánchez JM (2006) The September 8–9 1998 rain-triggered flood events at Motozintla, Chiapas, Mexico. Nat Hazards 39:103–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter SR, Walker BH, Anderies JM, Abel N (2001) From metaphor to measurement: resilience of what to what? Ecosystems 4:765–781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CENAPRED (2006) Características e impacto socioeconómico de los huracanes “Stan” y “Wilma” en la República Mexicana en el 2005. Secretaria de Gobernacion y Centro Nacional de Prevencion de Desastres, Distrito Federal

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapin FSI, Peterson G, Berkes F, Callaghan TV, Angelstam P, Apps M, Beier C, Bergeron Y, Crépin AS, Danell K, Elmqvist T, Folke C, Forbes B, Fresco N, Juday G, Neimela J, Shvidencko A, Whiteman G (2004) Resilience and vulnerability of northern regions to social and environmental change. Ambio 33(6):344–349

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiu T, Fang D, Chen J, Wang Y, Jeris C (2001) A robust and scalable clustering algorithm for mixed type attributes in large database environment. In: Proceedings of the seventh ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining. ACM, San Francisco

  • Cruz-Bello G, Eakin H, Morales H, Barrera J (2011) Linking multi-temporal analysis and community consultation to evaluate the response to the impact of Hurricane Stan in coffee areas of Chiapas, Mexico. Nat Hazards 58:103–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eakin H (2006) Weathering risk in Rural Mexico: economic, climatic and institutional change. University of Arizona Press, Tucson

    Google Scholar 

  • Eakin H, Luers A (2006) Assessing the vulnerability of social-environmental systems. Annu Rev Environ Resour 31:365–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eakin H, Wehbe M (2009) Linking local vulnerability to system sustainability in a resilience framework: two cases from Latin America. Clim Change. doi:10.1007/s10584-10008-19514-x

  • Eakin H, Tucker C, Castellanos E (2006) Responding to the coffee crisis: a pilot study of farmers’ adaptation in Mexico, Guatemala and Honduras. Geograph J 172:156–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis F (2000) Rural livelihoods and diversity in developing countries. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Eriksen S, Brown K, Kelly PM (2005) The dynamics of vulnerability: locating coping strategies in Kenya and Tanzania. Geograph J 171:287–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Everitt B, Landau S, Leese M (2001) Cluster analysis. Arnold Publishers, London

  • Folke C, Carpenter SR, Elmqvist T, Gunderson LH, Holling CS, Walker BH (2002) Resilience and sustainable development: building adaptive capacity in a world of transformations. Ambio 31:437–440

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallopin GC (2006) Linkages between vulnerability, resilience and adaptive capacity. Global Environ Change 16(3):293–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman D (2008) The international coffee crisis: a review of the literature. In: Bacon CM, Méndez VE, Gliessman SR, Goodman D, Fox JA (eds) Confronting the coffee crisis: fair trade, sustainable livelihoods and ecosystems in Mexico and Central America. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 337–372

  • Heltberg R, Siegel PB, Jorgensen SL (2009) Addressing human vulnerability to climate change: towards a ‘no-regrets’ approach. Global Environ Change 19:89–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holt-Giménez E (2002) Measuring farmers’ agroecological resistance after Hurricane Mitch in Nicaragua: a case study in participatory, sustainable land management impact monitoring. Agric Ecosyst Environ 93:87–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • INAFED (2010) Siltepec, Estado de Chiapas. Instituto Nacional Para el Federalismo y el Desarrollo Municipal, Gobierno del Estado de Chiapas. http://www.inafed.gob.mx/work/templates/enciclo/chiapas/municipios/07080a.htm. 2011

  • Kaufman L, Rousseeuw P (1990) Finding groups in data: an introduction to cluster analysis. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Klein RJT, Nicholls RJ, Thomalla F (2003) Resilience to natural hazards: How useful is this concept? Environ Hazards 5:35–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin BB (2007) Agroforestry management as an adaptive strategy against potential microclimatic extremes in coffee agriculture. Agric For Meteorol 144:84–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luers A, Lobell D, Sklar L, Addams CL, Matson PA (2003) A method for quantifying vulnerability, applied to the agricultural system of the Yaqui Valley, Mexico. Global Environ Change 13:255–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mas AH, Dietsch TV (2004) Linking shade coffee certification to biodiversity conservation: Butterflies and birds in Chiapas, Mexico. Ecol Appl 14(3):642–654

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McSweeney K, Coomes OT (2011) Climate-related disaster opens a window of opportunity for rural poor in northeastern Honduras. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 13:5203–5208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Millennium ecosystem assessment. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson D, Adger WN, Brown K (2007) Adaptation to environmental change: contributions of a resilience framework. Annu Rev Environ Resour 32:395–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nestel D (1995) Coffee in Mexico: international market, agricultural landscape and ecology. Ecol Econ 15:165–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oshbar H, Twyman C, Adger WN, Thomas DSG (2008) Effective livelihood adaptation to climate change disturbance: scale dimensions of practice in Mozambique. Geoforum 39:1951–1964

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perfecto I, Vandermeer J, Mas A, Pinto LS (2005) Biodiversity, yield, and shade coffee certification. Ecol Econ 54(4):435–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ponte S (2002) The ‘Latte Revolution’? Regulation, markets and consumption in the global coffee chain. World Dev 30(7):1099–1122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raudsepp-Hearne C, Peterson GD, Tengö M, Bennett EM, Holland T, Benessaiah K, MacDonald G, Pfeifer L (2010) Untangling the environmentalist’s paradox: why is human well-being increasing as ecosystem services degrade? Bioscience 60(8):576–589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richter M (2000) The ecological crisis in Chiapas: a case study from Central America. Mountain Res Dev 20(4):332–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saldaña-Zorrilla SO (2008) Stakeholders’ views in reducing rural vulnerability to natural disasters in Southern Mexico: hazard exposure and coping and adaptive capacity. Global Environ Change 18:583–597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz G (1978) Estimating the dimension of a model. Ann Stat 6(2):497–511

    Google Scholar 

  • SIAP (Servicio de Información Agroalimentaria y Pesquera) (2010) Secretaría de Agricultura Ganadería Desarrollo Rural Pesca y Alimentación, México, http://www.siap.gob.mx. Accessed July 17 2011

  • Tompkins E, Lemos MC, Boyd E (2008) A less disastrous disaster: managing response to climate-driven hazards in the Cayman Islands and NE Brazil. Global Environ Change 18:736–745

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner BL II (2010) Vulnerability and resilience: coalescing or paralleling approaches for sustainability science? Global Environ Change 20:570–576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vasquez SMA (ed) (2008) Zonas afectadas por el huracán Stan en las regiones Istmo-Costa, Sierra y Soconusco (Investigación para el ordenamiento). Editorial Fray Bartolomé de las Casas, A.C., Chiapas

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasquez SMA (2009) El huracán Stan en Tapachula (Investigación para su ordenamiento y desarrollo humano). Editorial Fray Bartolomé de las Casas, A.C., San Cristobal de las Casas

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker B, Meyers JA (2004) Thresholds in ecological and social-ecological systems: a developing database. Ecol Soc 9(2):art 3

  • Walker B, Holling CS, Carpenter SR, Kinzig A (2004) Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social-ecological systems. Ecol Soc 9(2):5 [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol19/iss12/art15

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang T, Ramakrishnon R, Livny M (1996) BIRCH: an efficient data clustering method for very large databases In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD conference on management of data. ACM, Montreal

Download references

Acknowledgments

This manuscript is the product of an interdisciplinary collaboration between US and Mexican scientists, funded by the Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research (CRN Grant #2060, E. Castellanos, PI) and the University of California Institute for Mexico and the United States (UC-MEXUS). We are extremely appreciative of the time and consideration given to us by the residents of Siltepec, who were still recovering from their losses to Stan at the time of our research. Many thanks to Pedro Ramirez, Conrado Martinez, Joel Herrera and the students who participated in data collection. We also are appreciative of the comments of the anonymous reviewers of this manuscript, whose comments substantially improved our analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hallie Eakin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Eakin, H., Benessaiah, K., Barrera, J.F. et al. Livelihoods and landscapes at the threshold of change: disaster and resilience in a Chiapas coffee community. Reg Environ Change 12, 475–488 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-011-0263-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-011-0263-4

Keywords

Navigation