Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Assessing the susceptibility of societies to droughts: a political science perspective

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Regional Environmental Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this article we develop a concept for the assessment of state’s susceptibility to drought based on a political science perspective. Different sources of capacities and sensitivities need to be taken into account to assess the overall susceptibility of states as political systems. We argue that the overall susceptibility of a society depends on an interplay of state capacity and readiness as main elements of political susceptibility, wealth and economic sensitivity as elements of economic susceptibility and the degree of social integration. To transform the conceptual model into a susceptibility assessment we developed an inference model in order to generate quantitative indices. For this purpose we apply fuzzy set theory using data from our case study regions, namely Andhra Pradesh (India), the Volga region (Russia) and (Southern) Portugal. The resulting computed trends for Portugal suggest that the society will be able to deal even with severe natural conditions due to existing political, economic, and social conditions. The assessment results for the Indian and Russian case study regions, in contrast, give reason for precaution since the occurrence of drought-induced crisis events seems much more likely in the light of more crucial, overall conditions, namely lower degrees of state capacity and readiness as well as, in the case of India, a high economic susceptibility. However, further improvements are possible given the improved availability of data and the integration of more qualitative information. Additionally, the expansion to further case study regions could help validate the overall concept.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acosta-Michlik L, Kumar K, Klein RJT, Campe S (2008) Assessing state susceptibility from a socio-economic perspective for the development and application of Security Diagrams. Reg Environ Change

  • Acosta-Micjlik L, Eierdanz F, Alacmo J, Krömker D, Galli F, Klein RJT et al (2006) An empircal application of the security diagram to assess the vulnerability of india to climate stress. Erde 137(3):199–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Alcamo J, Endejan M (2001) The security diagram: an approach to quantifying global environmental security. In: Petzold-Bradley E, Carius A, Vincze A (eds) Responding to environmental conflicts: implications for theory and practice. NATO ASI series. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 133–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Alcamo J, Carius A, Eierdanz F, Klein RJT, Krömker D, Acosta-Michlik L et al (2008) Vulnerability to drought: quantifying and comparing different disciplinary perspectives. Reg Environ Change

  • Arbetman M, Kugler J (1997) Political capacity and economic behavior. Westview Press, Boulder

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson C (1998) The cost of disasters. In: IDNDR (eds) Development at risk? Natural disasters and the third world. Oxford Centre for Disaster Studies

  • Blaikie PM, Brookfield H (eds) (1987) Land degradation and society. Methuen, London/New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkes F (1999) Sacred ecology. Traditional ecological knowledge and resource management. Taylor & Francis, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnegie Commission on Preventing Deadly Conflict (1997) Final report. Carnegie Commission on Preventing Deadly Conflict, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Center for Global Development (2007) Does the IMF constrain health spending in poor countries? Evidence and an agenda for action. Center for Global Development, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Chua A (2003) World on fire. How exporting free markets democracy breeds ethnic hatred and global instability. Doubleday, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis T (2006) A failure of initiative. Final report of the select Bipartisan Committee to investigate the preparation for and response to Hurricane Katrina, 10 October, 2007. http://www.katrina.house.gov/index.htm

  • Diamond J (2005) Collapse. How societies choose to fail or succeed. Viking, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberwein WD, Chojnacki S (2001) Scientific necessity and political utility. A comparsion of data on violent conflicts. Wissenschaftszentrum für Sozialforschung, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Eierdanz F, Alcamo J, Acosta-Michlik L, Krömker D, Tänzler D (2008) Using fuzzy set theory to address the uncertainty of susceptibility to drought. Reg Environ Change

  • Fauvelle-Aymar C (1999) The political and tax capacity of government in developing countries. Kyklos 52(3):391–413. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6435.1999.tb00224.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freedom House (2001) Press freedom survey 2001. Washington, DC

  • Fund for Peace 2007, Failed State Index 2007. 30 August, 2007, Available at http://www.fundforpeace.org

  • GAVI (2000) Immunize every child. GAVI Strategy for sustainable immunization services. Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization, Geneva

  • Grindle MS (1996) Challenging the state: crisis and innovation in Latin America and Africa. Cambridge Studies in Comparative Politics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Grindle MS (1997) Getting good government. Capacity building in the public sectors of developing countries. Havard University Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Haug S (1997) Soziales Kapital. Ein kritischer Überblick über den aktuellen Forschungsstand. Mannheimer Zentrum für Europäische Sozialforschung, Arbeitspapiere Arbeitsbereich II/15. Mannheimer Zentrum für Europäische Sozialforschung, Mannheim

  • Homer-Dixon T (1994) Environmental scarcities and violent conflict: evidence from cases. Int Secur 19(1):5–40. doi:10.2307/2539147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (1996) Climate change 1995. Impacts, adaptations and mitigation of climate change. Contributions of working group II to the second assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2001) Climate change 2001: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. summary for policymakers. A report of working group II of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2007) Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Working group II contribution to the intergovernmental panel on climate change fourth assessment report. Summary for policymakers. 30 July 2007. Available at http://www.ipcc.ch/SPM13apr07.pdf

  • Jaggers K, Gurr TR (1995) Tracking democracy’s third wave with the polity III data. J Peace Res 32:469–482. doi:10.1177/0022343395032004007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins CJ, Bond D (2001) Conflict carrying capacity, political crisis, and re-construction: a framework for the early warning of political system vulnerability. J Conflict Resolut 45:3–31. doi:10.1177/0022002701045001001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krömker D, Eierdanz F, Stolberg A (2008) Susceptibility from agent based perspective: the protection-capacity model. Reg Environ Change

  • Lambsdorff JG (2001) How corruption in government affects public welfare—a review of theories. Discussion Paper 9. Center for Globalization and Europeanization of the Economy, Göttingen

  • Mann M (2004) The dark side of democracy. Explaining ethnic cleansing. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell J (1998) Protecting development. Integrating disasters and development. In: IDNDR (eds) Development at risk? Natural disasters and the third world. Oxford Centre for Disaster Studies

  • Munich Re (2004) Topics geo. Jahresrückblick Naturkatastrophen 2003, München

  • Pfahl S, Tänzler D (2005) Bestandsaufnahme und Bewertung von Capacity Development-Maßnahmen im Bereich der internationalen Klimapolitik. Studie im Auftrag des DIE. Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik, Bonn

  • Pfetsch FR, Rohloff C (2000) KOSIMO: a databank on political conflict. J Peace Res 37:379–389. doi:10.1177/0022343300037003006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prescott-Allen R (2001) The well being of nations. Island Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam RD (2000) Bowling alone the collapse and revival of American community. Simon & Schuster, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rössel J (2002) Die Qualität von demokratischen Regimen. Zur Erklärung der politischen Performanz in Italien und Indien durch Robert Putnam und Patrick Heller. Polit Vierteljahresschr 43:302–329. doi:10.1007/s11615-002-0034-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rotberg RI (2007) The challenge of weak, failing and collapsed states. In: Crocker CA, Hampson, FO, Aall P (eds) Leashing the dogs of war. United States Institute for Peace, Washington, DC, pp 83–94

  • Schneckener U (ed) (2004) States at risk. Fragile Staatlichkeit als Sicherheits- und Entwicklungsproblem. Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneckener U (2007) Rankings und Indizes: Welche Staaten gelten als fragil? 29 August, 2007. http://www.swp-berlin.org/de/common/get_document.php?asset_id=3832

  • Schwartz J (2003) The impact of state capacity on enforcement of environmental policies: the case of China. J Environ Dev 12(1):50–81. doi:10.1177/1070496502250438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen A (1981) Poverty and famines: an essay on entitlement and deprivation. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen A (1999) Democracy as a universal value. J Democracy 10(3):3–17. doi:10.1353/jod.1999.0055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skocpol T (1999) Bringing the state back in: strategies of analysis in current research. In: Evans P, Rueschemeyer D, Skocpol T (eds) Bringing the state back in. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 3–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Skoufias E (2003) Economic crisis and natural disasters: coping strategies and policy implications. World Dev 31:1087–1102. doi:10.1016/S0305-750X(03)00069-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • State Capacity Project (1997) The project on environmental scarcities, state capacity, and civil violence: American academy of arts, peace and conflict studies program at University College of the University of Toronto

  • State Failure Task Force (2000) State failure task force report: phase III findings. Available at http://www.cidcm.umd.edu/inscr/stfail/SFTF%20Phase%20III%20Report%20Final.pdf

  • Tänzler D, Feil M, Krömker D, Eierdanz F (2008) The challenge of validating vulnerability estimates—the option of media content analysis for identifying drought-related crises. Reg Environ Change

  • Taylor CL, Jodice DA (1983) world handbook of political and social indicators. Volume 1: Cross-national attributes and rates of change, 3rd edn. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • TERI (2003) Coping with global change: vulnerability and adaptation in Indian agriculture. The Energy Research Institute, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Twigg J (1998) Disasters, development and vulnerability. In: IDNDR (eds) Development at risk? Natural disasters and the third world. Oxford Centre for Disaster Studies, pp 2–7

  • UNDP (2003) Human Development Report 2003. Millennium development goals: a compact among nations to end human poverty. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • UNEP (2007) Sudan: post-conflict environmental assessment. Verfügbar unter. 31 August, 2007. http://www.unep.org/sudan/

  • UNESC (United Nations Economic and Social Council) (1998) Promoting social integration and participation of all people, including disadvantaged and vulnerable groups and persons. Report of the Secretary General. E/CN.5/1998/2

  • USAID (2006) Fragile states indicators a supplement to the country analytical template. US Agency for International Development, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanhanen T (2000) A new dataset for measuring democracy, 1810–1998. J Peace Res 37(2):251–265. doi:10.1177/0022343300037002008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker PA (2005) Political ecology: where is the ecology? Prog Hum Geogr 29(1):73–82. doi:10.1191/0309132505ph530pr

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watts MJ (1983) Silent violence: food, famine and peasantry in northern Nigeria. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • WBGU (2007) Welt im Wandel: Sicherheitsrisiko Klimawandel. WBGU, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (1999) World development indicators 1999. World Bank, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2003) World Development Report 2003. Sustainable development in a dynamic world. Transforming institutions, growth, and quality of life. World Bank/Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization (1981) Global strategy for health for all by the year 2000. World Health Organization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization (1999) Health 21. The health for all policy framework for the WHO European region. World Health Organization, Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen

    Google Scholar 

  • World Summit for Social Development, WSSD (1995) Copenhagen declaration on social development. Available at http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/wssd/documents/index.html

  • Zimmerer KS, Bassett TJ (2003) Political ecology: an integrative approach to geography and environment-development studies. Guilford Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Adelphi Research gGmbH, Caspar-Theyß-Straße 14a, 14193, Berlin, Germany

    Dennis Taenzler, Alexander Carius & Achim Maas

Authors
  1. Dennis Taenzler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alexander Carius
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Achim Maas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dennis Taenzler.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Taenzler, D., Carius, A. & Maas, A. Assessing the susceptibility of societies to droughts: a political science perspective. Reg Environ Change 8, 161–172 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-008-0067-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-008-0067-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation