Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Application of fuzzy models to assess susceptibility to droughts from a socio-economic perspective

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Regional Environmental Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

By combining the concepts of environmental stress, state susceptibility and environmental crisis, “Security Diagram” (SD) provides a quantitative approach to assessing environmental change and human security. The SD is a tool that clearly presents in a diagram the security situation of a population or region affected by a particular environmental crisis. Its underlying concept emphasises that the higher the level of environmental stress and socio-economic susceptibility, the higher the probability of the occurrence of crisis. Focusing on drought, this study analyses the susceptibility of case study regions in India, Portugal, and Russia from a socio-economic perspective. A conceptual framework of socio-economic susceptibility is developed based on the economic development theories of modernisation and dependency. Fuzzy set theory is used to generate susceptibility indices from a range of national and sub-national indicators, including financial resources, agricultural dependency and infrastructure development (for economic susceptibility), and health condition, educational attainment and gender inequality (for social susceptibility). Results indicate that socio-economic susceptibility over the period 1980–1995 was highest in India, followed by Russia and (since 1989) lowest in Portugal. Globalisation is likely to contribute to changes in the level of socio-economic susceptibility over time. Moreover, specific social and economic structures unique in each country (e.g., the role of women in society in India, the socialist legacy in Russia) may explain differences in susceptibility between the case study regions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Research on natural hazards and food security shows that poverty reduces the capacity of a society to adapt to environmental stress (Blaikie et al. 1994; Bohle et al. 1994).

References

  • Acosta-Michlik L (2005) Intervulnerability Assessment: Shifting Foci from Generic Indices to Adaptive Agents in Assessing Vulnerability to Global Environmental Change (A Pilot Project in the Philippines). Project Report of the Advanced Institute on Vulnerability to Global Environmental Change. http://www.start.org/Program/advanced_institutes_3.html

  • Acosta-Michlik L, Eierdanz F, Alcamo J, Klein RJT, Kumar K, Campe S (2006) How vulnerable is India to climatic stress? Measuring vulnerability to drought using the security diagram concept. Climate Change and Human Security. DIE ERDE Special Volume Clim Change 137(1):223–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Acosta-Michlik L, Rounsevell M (2008). An agent-based framework for assessing vulnerability futures. In: Schröter D, Patt AG, de la Vega-Leinert AC, Klein RJT (eds) Environmental vulnerability assessment for policy and decision-making. Earthscan (in press)

  • Alcamo J, Endejan M (2001) The security diagram: an approach to quantifying global environmental security. In: Petzold-Bradley E, Carius A, Vincze A (eds) Responding to environmental conflicts: implications for theory and practice. Kluwer, Netherlands

  • Blaikie T, Cannon ID, Wisner B (1994) At risk: natural hazards, people’s vulnerability and disasters. Routledge, London

  • Bohle HG, Downing TE, Watts MJ (1994) Climate change and social vulnerability: toward a sociology and geography of food insecurity. Glob Environ Change 4(1):37–48. doi:10.1016/0959-3780(94)90020-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonvillain N (2001) Women and men: cultural constructs of gender. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell JC (1993) Health transition: cultural, social and behavioral determinants of health in the Third World. Social Sci Med 36:125–135

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cornelissen AMG, Berg JVD, Koops WJ, Grossman M, Udo HMJ (2001) Assessment of the contribution of sustainability indicators to sustainable development: a novel approach using fuzzy set theory. Agric Ecosyst Environ 86:173–185. doi:10.1016/S0167-8809(00)00272-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downing TE, Butterfield R, Cohen S, Huq S, Moss R, Rahman A et al (2001) Vulnerability indices: climate change impacts and adaptation. UNEP, Nairobi

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunlop JE, Velkoff VA (1999) Women of the world: Women and the economy in India.WID/98–2, U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Census, 7 pp

  • Eierdanz F, Alcamo J, Acosta-Michlik L, Krömker D, Tänzler D (2008) Using fuzzy set theory to address the uncertainty of susceptibility to drought. Reg Environ Change (this volume)

  • Gavrilova NS, Semyonova VG, Evdokushkina GN, Gavrilova LA (2000) The response of violent mortality to economic crisis in Russia. Popul Res Policy Rev 19:397–419. doi:10.1023/A:1010621601409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta S, Verhoeven M, Tiongson ER (2002) The effectiveness of government spending on education and health care in developing and transition economies. Eur J Polit Econ 18:717–737. doi:10.1016/S0176-2680(02)00116-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Homer-Dixon TF (1994) Environmental scarcities and violent conflict: evidence from cases. Int Secur 19(1):5–40. doi:10.2307/2539147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howitt RE, Sexton RJ (1998) The optimal joint provision of water for irrigation and hydropower. J Environ Econ Manage 36:295–313. doi:10.1006/jeem.1998.1047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2001) Climate change 2001: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Lietzmann KM, Vest GD (1999) Environment and security in an international context. Environmental Change & Security Project Report, Issue 5

  • Lonergan S, Gustavson K, Carter B (2000) The index of human insecurity. AVISO:2002

  • Mays MD, Bogardi I, Bardossy A (1997) Fuzzy logic and risk-based soil interpretations. Geoderma 77:299–315. doi:10.1016/S0016-7061(97)00027-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehta AK, Shah A (2001) Chronic Poverty in India: Overview Study.CPRC Working Paper 7. Chronic Poverty Research Centre, pp 81

  • Michalland B, Parent E, Duckstein L (1997) Bi-objective dynamic programming for trading off hydropower and irrigation. Appl Math Comput 88:53–76. doi:10.1016/S0096-3003(96)00306-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mundle S (1998) Financing human development: some lessons from advanced Asian economies. World Dev 26(4):659–672. doi:10.1016/S0305-750X(98)00004-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien KL, Leichenko RM (2000) Double eExposure: assessing the impacts of climate change within the context of economic globalization. Glob Environ Change 10:221–232. doi:10.1016/S0959-3780(00)00021-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen A (1981) Poverty and famines: an essay on entitlement and deprivation. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen C, Williamson JB (2001) Accounting for cross-national differences in infant mortality decline (1965–1991) among less developed countries: effects of women’s status, economic dependency, and state strength. Soc Indic Res 53:257–288. doi:10.1023/A:1007190612314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sulaiman RV, Holt G (2002) Extension, poverty and vulnerability in India. Working Paper 154. London, Overseas Development Institute: 41

  • World Bank (2002) Globalization, growth, and poverty: building an inclusive world economy. Oxford University Press, New York

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the contribution of their colleagues in the Security Diagrams Project, which was part of their work at the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK) in Germany. The DEKLIM Program of the German Ministry of Education and Research provided funding for this project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lilibeth A. Acosta-Michlik.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Acosta-Michlik, L.A., Kavi Kumar, K.S., Klein, R.J.T. et al. Application of fuzzy models to assess susceptibility to droughts from a socio-economic perspective. Reg Environ Change 8, 151–160 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-008-0058-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-008-0058-4

Keywords

Navigation