Skip to main content
Log in

Who is susceptible and why? An agent-based approach to assessing vulnerability to drought

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Regional Environmental Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we specify susceptibility to drought from a psychology-based bottom-up perspective. On the basis of the protection motivation theory (Rippetoe and Rogers in J Pers Soc Psychol 52(3):596–604, 1987), we developed the protection-capacity model (Krömker and Mosler in Global environmental change in Alpine regions: impact, recognition, adaptation, and mitigation. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 93–112, 2002) to analyse the susceptibility with respect to the protection capacity of agents. The protection capacity is determined by the agents’ subjective assessment of the situation, which consists of the appraisal of threat, on the one hand, and the coping appraisal, on the other hand. Additionally, the protection-capacity model specifies several factors which influence the two central appraisal processes. Empirical data were collected in interviews with experts and with a total of 65 exemplarily selected households which are typical for the respective case study regions (Andhra Pradesh, India; Algarve and Alentejo, Portugal; Volgograd and Saratov, Russia). The data were analysed with the help of fuzzy set methodology. Results show that the households of the Indian region are the most susceptible when compared to those of the Russian region with ‘low’ and to households of the Portuguese region with a ‘very low’ degree of susceptibility. Moreover, we identified subgroups within the regions which are characterized by different degrees of susceptibility and a different profile of factors influencing susceptibility. Altogether, the agent-based perspective allows identifying relevant factors that need to be addressed to minimize susceptibility of the population and special subgroups. However, the results are not representative for the case study regions because of the small database. Additionally, more effort is needed to validate the findings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Madras School of Economics, India (Dr. K. S. Kavi Kumar), Euronatura, Portugal (Pedro Barata), Moscow State University, Russia (Valentina Pavlova), Mari State Technical University, Russia (Eldar Kurbanov).

References

  • Acosta-Michlik L, Kumar K, Klein RJT, Campe S (2008) Assessing state susceptibility from a socio-economic perspective for the development and application of security diagrams (in review)

  • Agarwal B (1990) Social security and the family: coping with seasonality and calamity in rural India. J Peasant Stud 17:341–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alcamo J, Acosta-Michlik L, Carius A, Eierdanz F, Klein RJT, Krömker D, Tänzler D (2008) Vulnerability to drought: quantifying and comparing different disciplinary perspectives: mitigation and adaptation strategies for global change. Reg Environ Change (this volume)

  • Blaikie PT, Cannon ID, Wisner B (1994) At risk: natural hazards, people’s vulnerability and disasters. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Bothe H-H (1998) Neuro-Fuzzy-Methoden. Einführung in Theorie und Anwendungen. Berlin

  • Chambers R (1989) Vulnerability, coping and policy. IDS Bull 20:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers R (1997) Whose reality counts: putting the last first. Intermediate Technology, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies S (1996) Adaptable livelihoods: coping with food insecurity in the Malian Sahel. Macmillan Press, Hound mills

    Google Scholar 

  • Devereux S, Naeraa T (1996) Drought and survival in rural Namibia. J S Afr Stud 22(3):421–440

    Google Scholar 

  • Downing TE, Watts J, Bohle HG (1996) Climate change and food insecurity: toward a sociology and geography of vulnerability. In: Downing TE (ed) Climate change and food security. Springer, Berlin, pp 183–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Eierdanz F, Alcamo J, Acosta-Michlik L, Krömker D, Tänzler D (2008) Using fuzzy set theory to address the uncertainty of susceptibility to drought (in review)

  • Krömker D, Mosler H-J (2002) Human vulnerability: factors influencing the implementation of prevention and protection measures: an agent based approach. In: Steininger K, Weck-Hannemann H (eds) Global environmental change in Alpine regions: impact, recognition, adaptation, and mitigation. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 93–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Liverman D (2000) Adaptation to drought in Mexico. In: Wilhite DA (ed) Drought: a global assessment. Routledge, London, pp 35–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Milne S, Sheeran P, Orbell S (2000) Prediction and intervention in health-related behavior: a meta-analytic review of protection motivation theory. J Appl Soc Psychol 30(1):106–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahmato D (1991) Famine and survival strategies: a case study from Northeast Ethiopia. Nordiska Afrikainstitutet, Uppsala

    Google Scholar 

  • Rippetoe AP, Rogers RW (1987) Effects of components of protection-motivation theory on adaptive and maladaptive coping with a health threat. J Pers Soc Psychol 52(3):596–604

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sastri ASRAS (2000) Agricultural drought management for sustained agricultural development. In: Wilhite DA (ed) Drought: a global assessment, vol 2. Routledge, London, pp 46–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz SH (1992) Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Adv Exp Soc Psychol 25:1–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spittler G (1994) Hungerkrisen im Sahel. Wie handeln die Betroffenen? Geogr Rundsch 46(7/8):408–413

    Google Scholar 

  • Subbiah AR (2000) Response strategies of local farmers in India. In: Wilhite DA (ed) Drought: a global assessment, vol II. Routledge, London, pp 29–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Tänzler D, Carius A (2008) Assessing the susceptibility of societies to droughts: a political science perspective (in review)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dörthe Krömker.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Krömker, D., Eierdanz, F. & Stolberg, A. Who is susceptible and why? An agent-based approach to assessing vulnerability to drought. Reg Environ Change 8, 173–185 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-008-0049-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-008-0049-5

Keywords

Navigation