Abstract
In this paper, we specify susceptibility to drought from a psychology-based bottom-up perspective. On the basis of the protection motivation theory (Rippetoe and Rogers in J Pers Soc Psychol 52(3):596–604, 1987), we developed the protection-capacity model (Krömker and Mosler in Global environmental change in Alpine regions: impact, recognition, adaptation, and mitigation. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 93–112, 2002) to analyse the susceptibility with respect to the protection capacity of agents. The protection capacity is determined by the agents’ subjective assessment of the situation, which consists of the appraisal of threat, on the one hand, and the coping appraisal, on the other hand. Additionally, the protection-capacity model specifies several factors which influence the two central appraisal processes. Empirical data were collected in interviews with experts and with a total of 65 exemplarily selected households which are typical for the respective case study regions (Andhra Pradesh, India; Algarve and Alentejo, Portugal; Volgograd and Saratov, Russia). The data were analysed with the help of fuzzy set methodology. Results show that the households of the Indian region are the most susceptible when compared to those of the Russian region with ‘low’ and to households of the Portuguese region with a ‘very low’ degree of susceptibility. Moreover, we identified subgroups within the regions which are characterized by different degrees of susceptibility and a different profile of factors influencing susceptibility. Altogether, the agent-based perspective allows identifying relevant factors that need to be addressed to minimize susceptibility of the population and special subgroups. However, the results are not representative for the case study regions because of the small database. Additionally, more effort is needed to validate the findings.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Madras School of Economics, India (Dr. K. S. Kavi Kumar), Euronatura, Portugal (Pedro Barata), Moscow State University, Russia (Valentina Pavlova), Mari State Technical University, Russia (Eldar Kurbanov).
References
Acosta-Michlik L, Kumar K, Klein RJT, Campe S (2008) Assessing state susceptibility from a socio-economic perspective for the development and application of security diagrams (in review)
Agarwal B (1990) Social security and the family: coping with seasonality and calamity in rural India. J Peasant Stud 17:341–412
Alcamo J, Acosta-Michlik L, Carius A, Eierdanz F, Klein RJT, Krömker D, Tänzler D (2008) Vulnerability to drought: quantifying and comparing different disciplinary perspectives: mitigation and adaptation strategies for global change. Reg Environ Change (this volume)
Blaikie PT, Cannon ID, Wisner B (1994) At risk: natural hazards, people’s vulnerability and disasters. Routledge, London
Bothe H-H (1998) Neuro-Fuzzy-Methoden. Einführung in Theorie und Anwendungen. Berlin
Chambers R (1989) Vulnerability, coping and policy. IDS Bull 20:1–7
Chambers R (1997) Whose reality counts: putting the last first. Intermediate Technology, London
Davies S (1996) Adaptable livelihoods: coping with food insecurity in the Malian Sahel. Macmillan Press, Hound mills
Devereux S, Naeraa T (1996) Drought and survival in rural Namibia. J S Afr Stud 22(3):421–440
Downing TE, Watts J, Bohle HG (1996) Climate change and food insecurity: toward a sociology and geography of vulnerability. In: Downing TE (ed) Climate change and food security. Springer, Berlin, pp 183–206
Eierdanz F, Alcamo J, Acosta-Michlik L, Krömker D, Tänzler D (2008) Using fuzzy set theory to address the uncertainty of susceptibility to drought (in review)
Krömker D, Mosler H-J (2002) Human vulnerability: factors influencing the implementation of prevention and protection measures: an agent based approach. In: Steininger K, Weck-Hannemann H (eds) Global environmental change in Alpine regions: impact, recognition, adaptation, and mitigation. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 93–112
Liverman D (2000) Adaptation to drought in Mexico. In: Wilhite DA (ed) Drought: a global assessment. Routledge, London, pp 35–45
Milne S, Sheeran P, Orbell S (2000) Prediction and intervention in health-related behavior: a meta-analytic review of protection motivation theory. J Appl Soc Psychol 30(1):106–143
Rahmato D (1991) Famine and survival strategies: a case study from Northeast Ethiopia. Nordiska Afrikainstitutet, Uppsala
Rippetoe AP, Rogers RW (1987) Effects of components of protection-motivation theory on adaptive and maladaptive coping with a health threat. J Pers Soc Psychol 52(3):596–604
Sastri ASRAS (2000) Agricultural drought management for sustained agricultural development. In: Wilhite DA (ed) Drought: a global assessment, vol 2. Routledge, London, pp 46–58
Schwartz SH (1992) Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Adv Exp Soc Psychol 25:1–65
Spittler G (1994) Hungerkrisen im Sahel. Wie handeln die Betroffenen? Geogr Rundsch 46(7/8):408–413
Subbiah AR (2000) Response strategies of local farmers in India. In: Wilhite DA (ed) Drought: a global assessment, vol II. Routledge, London, pp 29–34
Tänzler D, Carius A (2008) Assessing the susceptibility of societies to droughts: a political science perspective (in review)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Krömker, D., Eierdanz, F. & Stolberg, A. Who is susceptible and why? An agent-based approach to assessing vulnerability to drought. Reg Environ Change 8, 173–185 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-008-0049-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-008-0049-5