Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

An ecological economics approach to the management of a multi-purpose coastal wetland

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Regional Environmental Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Three interrelated management problems—eutrophication of multiple use shallow lakes, sea level rise and flood risk mitigation and tourism pressures—are analysed in the context of an internationally important wetland area, the Norfolk and Suffolk Broads in the UK. The ecological-economic research findings presented should provide essential information to underpin the regulatory and management process in this internationally important conservation area. The relevant authority somehow has to integrate the maintenance of public navigation rights, nature conservation, and tourism promotion in a highly dynamic ecosystems setting. Because of the stakeholder conflicts, potential and actual, a more inclusionary decision-making procedure is required, and is currently being implemented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arrow KJ, Solow R, Portney PR, Leamer EE, Radner R, Schuman EH (1993) Report of the NOAA panel on contingent valuation. Federal Register 58(10):4602–4614

    Google Scholar 

  • Balmford A, Bruner A, Cooper P, Costanza R, Farber S, Green R, Jenkins M, Jefferiss P, Jessamy V, Madden J, Munro K, Myers N, Naeem S, Paavola J, Rayment M, Roscendo S, Roughgarden J, Trumper K, Turner RK (2002) Economic reasons for conserving wild nature. Science 297:950–3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bateman IJ (1993) Valuation of the environment, methods and techniques: revealed preference methods. In: Turner RK (ed) Sustainable environmental economics and management: principles and practice. Belhaven Press, London, pp 192–265

  • Bateman IJ, Carson RT, Day B, Hanemann WM, Hett T, Jones-Lee M, Loomes G, Mourato S, Ozdemiroglu E, Pearce DW, Sudgen R, Swanson R (2002) Economic valuation with stated preference techniques: a manual. Edward Elgar Publications, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateman IJ, Day B, Dupont D, Georgiou S, Matias NGN, Morimoto S, Subramanian L (2004) Does phosphate treatment for prevention of eutrophication pass the benefit cost test. Mimeo, University of East Anglia

  • Bateman IJ, Garrod GD, Brainard JS, Lovett AA (1996) Measurement, valuation and estimation issues in the travel cost method: a geographical information systems approach. J Agr Econ 47(2):191–205

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateman IJ, Langford IH (1997) Non-users willingness to pay for a National Park: an application and critique of the contingent valuation method. Regional Stud 31(6):571–582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bateman IJ, Langford IH, Nishikawa N, Lake I (2000) The Axford debate revisited: a case study illustrating different approaches to the aggregation of benefits data. J Environ Plan Manage 43(2):291–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bateman IJ, Langford IH, Turner RK, Willis KG, Garrod GD (1995) Elicitation and truncation effects in contingent valuation studies. Ecolog Econ 12 161–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateman IJ, Langford IH, Willis KG, Turner RK, Garrod GD (1993) The impacts of changing willingness to pay question format in contingent valuation studies: an analysis of open-ended, iterative bidding and dichotomous choice formats. Global Environ Change Working Pap 93–05, Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment, University of East Anglia, Norwich and University College, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateman IJ, Lovett AA, Brainard JS (1999) Developing a methodology for benefit transfers using geographical information systems: modelling demand for woodland recreation. Regional Stud 33(3):191–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bateman IJ, Willis KG, Garrod GD (1994) Consistency between contingent valuation estimates: a comparison of two studies of UK national parks. Regional Stud 28(5):457–474

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateman IJ, Willis KG, Garrod GD, Doktor P, Langford I, Turner RK (1992) Recreational and environmental preservation value of the Norfolk Broads: a contingent valuation study. Unpubl Rep, Environmental Appraisal Group, University of East Anglia

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergin J, Price C (1994) The travel cost method and landscape quality. Landscape Res 19:21–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyle KJ, Bergstrom JC (1992) Benefit transfer studies: myths, pragmatism, and idealism. Water Resour Res 28(3):657–663

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brainard J, Lovett A, Bateman I (1999) Integrating geographical information systems into travel cost analysis and benefit transfer. Int J Geogr Inform Sci 13(3):227–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broads Authority (1997) Broads plan 1997. The strategy and management plan for the Norfolk and Suffolk Broads, February 1997

  • Broads Authority (2004) Broads plan: a strategic plan to manage the Norfolk and Suffolk Broads, Broads Authority, Colegate, Norwich

    Google Scholar 

  • Brouwer R (1999) Public right of access, over crowding and the value of peace and quiet; the validity of contingent valuation as an information tool. GEC Working Pap 99–05, Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment (CSERGE), University of East Anglia, Norwich

  • Brouwer R, Crooks S (1998) Towards an integrated framework for wetland ecosystem indicators, Working Paper GEC 98–27, Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK

  • Brouwer R, Turner RK, Voisey H (2002) Public perception of overcrowding and management alternatives in a multi-purpose open access resource. J Sust Tourism 9(6):471–490

    Google Scholar 

  • Burbridge PR (1994) Integrated planning and management of freshwater habitats, including wetlands. Hydrobiologia 285:311–322

    Google Scholar 

  • Carson RT, Mitchell RM (1995) Sequencing and nesting in contingent valuation surveys. J Environ Econ Manage 28:155–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clayton AMH, Radcliffe NJ (1996) Sustainability: a systems approach. Earthscan Publications Ltd., London

  • Climate Change (2001) Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability, contribution of Working Group II to the third assessment report of intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, McCarthy J, Canziani OF, Leary NA, David DJ, White KS (eds) Cambridge University Press, pp 295–303

  • Cooper JC, Hanemann M, Signorello G (2002) One-and-one-half-bound dichotomous choice contingent valuation. Rev Econ Stat 84(4):742–750

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costanza R, d’Arge R, de Groot R, Farber S, Grasso M, Hannon B, Limburg K, Naeem S, O’Neill RV, Paruelo J, Raskin RG, Sutton P, van den Belt M (1997) The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387:253–260

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dillman DA (1978) mail and telephone surveys—the total design method. Wiley, New York

  • Environment Agency (1997) Broadland flood alleviation strategy: bank strengthening and erosion protection. Environment Agency, Suffolk

    Google Scholar 

  • Holzer TJ, Perrow MR, Madgwick FJ, Dunsford DS (1997) Practical aspects of broads restoration. In: Madgwick FJ, Phillips GL (eds) Restoration of the Norfolk Broads. BAR 14e, Broads Authority and (P-91) Environment Agency, Norfolk, UK

  • Horne AJ, Goldman CR (1994) Limnology, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York, p 576

  • Kahneman D, Knetsch JL (1992) Valuing public goods: the purchase of moral satisfaction. J Environ Econ Manage 22:55–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Madgwick FJ, Phillips GL (1996) Restoration of the Norfolk Broads—Final Report to E.C. Life Programme, BARS14, Broads Authority, Norfolk, UK

  • Maltby E, Hogan DV, McInnes RJ (eds) (1996) Functional analysis of European wetland ecosystems. Final report Phase One, EC DG XII STEP Project CT90–0084. Wetland Ecosystems Research Group, University of London

  • May RWP, Waters CB (1986) Boat wash study. Broads Authority, Bars 12, Norwich

  • McConnell KE (1992) Model building with judgement: implications for benefit transfers with travel cost models. Water Resour Res 28(3):695–700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moss B (1983) The Norfolk Broadland: experiments in restoration of a complex wetland. Biol Rev 58 521–526

    Google Scholar 

  • Moss B, Stansfield J, Irvine K, Perrow M, Phillips G (1996) Progressive restoration of a shallow lake: a 12-year experiment in isolation, sediment removal and biomanipulation. J Appl Ecol 33(1):71–86

    Google Scholar 

  • National Rivers Authority (1992) A flood alleviation strategy for Broadland: Final Report Annex Four—cost benefit studies. NRA, Anglian Region, Peterborough

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitt J-A, Kelly A, Phillips GL (1997) Control of nutrient release from sediments. In: Madgewick FJ, Phillips GL (eds) Restoration of the Norfolk Broads, BARS 14a, ISBN 0 948119 42 X, Broads Authority and Environment Agency, Norwich, England

  • Powe NA (2000) Contingent valuation and non-market wetland benefit assessment; the case of the Broadland flood alleviation scheme. PhD Thesis, School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia

  • Pretty JN, Mason CF, Nedwell DB, Hine RE (2002) A preliminary assessment of the environmental costs of the eutrophication of fresh waters in England and Wales. University of Essex, UK

  • Scheffer M, Hosper SH, Meijer M-L, Moss B, Jeppesen E (1993) Alternative equilibria in shallow lakes. Trends Ecol Evol 8(8):275–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stansfield J, Caswell S, Perrow M (1997) Biomanipulation as a restoration tool. In: Madgewick FJ, Phillips GL (eds) Restoration of the Norfolk Broads, BARS 14a, ISBN 0 948119 42 X, Broads Authority and Environment Agency, Norwich, England

  • Strategic Leisure and TEP (2001) Broads boat hire industry study: draft strategy and action plan, c/o Broads Authority, Colegate, Norwich, 30 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner RK (1991) Economics and wetland management. Ambio 20(2):59–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner RK, Adger WN, Doktor P (1995) Assessing the economic costs of sea level rise. Environ Plan A 27:1777–1796

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner RK, Brooke J (1988) Management and valuation of an environmentally sensitive area: Norfolk Broadland, England, case study. Environ Manage 12(2):193–207

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner RK, Geogious S, Brouwer R, Bateman IJ, Langford IJ (2003) Towards an integrated environmental assessment for wetland and catchment management. Geogr J 169(2):99–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner RK, Lorenzoni I, Beaumont N, Bateman IJ, Langford IH, Mcdonald AL (1998) Coastal management for sustainable development: analysing environmental and socio-economic changes on the UK coast. Geogr J 164:269–281

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner RK, van den Bergh JCJM, Barendregt A, Maltby E (1997) Ecological-economic analysis of wetlands: science and social science integration. In: Söderquist T (ed) Wetlands: landscape and institutional perspectives. Proceedings of the 4th workshop of the Global Wetlands Economics Network (GWEN). Beijer International Institute of Ecological Economics. The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, Stockholm, Sweden, 16–17 November, 1997

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. K. Turner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Turner, R.K., Bateman, I.J., Georgiou, S. et al. An ecological economics approach to the management of a multi-purpose coastal wetland. Reg Environ Change 4, 86–99 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-004-0075-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-004-0075-x

Keywords

Navigation