Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Modelling work domain knowledge with the combined use of abstraction hierarchy and living systems theory

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cognition, Technology & Work Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study is aimed at developing a new method for modelling work domain knowledge with the combined use of abstraction hierarchy (AH) and living systems theory (LST). AH has been widely used as a work domain knowledge representation framework in the field of cognitive systems engineering and human–computer interaction, and its usefulness has been proved in a range of work domains. However, its effective use still remains a challenging issue. In order to address this problem, this study firstly points out several issues that can be raised in the use of AH and then explains why and how LST can give concepts and principles helpful to resolve them. The proposed method offers a framework for how to combine AH and LST, particularly to identify functional knowledge at higher abstraction levels. It also offers a process for modelling the knowledge of a work domain based on the combined use of AH and LST. The use of the proposed method is exemplified by modelling the knowledge of a simplified secondary cooling system of nuclear power plants. The proposed method is a new approach to refining the concepts of AH and modelling the knowledge of a work domain that humans should interact. It is believed that it will be a useful tool for knowledge modellers in identifying and modelling the knowledge of a work domain in terms of its functional structure. However, it should be noted that its usefulness can be limited to technology-oriented engineering systems; it would not be easily applied to human activity-oriented systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Achonu J, Jamieson GA (2003) Work domain analysis of a financial system: an abstraction hierarchy for portfolio management. In: Proceedings of the 22nd European annual conference on human decision making and control, pp 103–109

  • Ahlstrom U (2005) Work domain analysis for air traffic controller weather displays. J Saf Res 36(2):159–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey KD (2006) Living systems theory and social entropy theory. Syst Res Behav Sci 23(3):291–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becerra-Fernandez I, González AJ, Sabherwal R (2004) Knowledge management: challenges, solutions, and technologies. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Belmonte F, Schön W, Heurley L, Capel R (2011) Interdisciplinary safety analysis of complex socio-technological systems based on the functional resonance accident model: an application to railway traffic supervision. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 96(2):237–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett KB (2014) Ecological interface design: military C2 and computer network defense. In: Proceedings of 2014 IEEE international conference on systems, man, and cybernetics, pp 341–346

  • Bisantz AM, Burns CM (eds) (2009) Applications of cognitive work analysis. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Bisantz AM, Mazaeva N (2009) Work domain analysis using the abstraction hierarchy: Two contrasting cases. In: Bisantz AM, Burns CM (eds) Applications of cognitive work analysis. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 49–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Bisantz AM, Vicente KJ (1994) Making the abstraction hierarchy concrete. Int J Hum Comput Stud 40(1):83–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burns CM, Hajdukiewicz JR (2004) Ecological interface design. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns CM, Vicente KJ (1995) A framework for describing and understanding interdisciplinary interactions in design. In: Proceedings of the 1st conference on designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, and techniques, pp 97–103

  • Burns CM, Vicente KJ (2001) Model-based approaches to analyzing cognitive work: a comparison of abstraction hierarchy, multilevel flow modelling, and decision ladder modelling. Int J Cogn Ergon 5(3):357–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burns CM, Kuo J, Ng S (2003) Ecological interface design: a new approach for visualizing network management. Comput Netw 43(3):369–388

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Burns CM, Bisantz AM, Roth EM (2004) Lessons from a comparison of work domain models: representational choices and their implications. Hum Factors 46(4):711–727

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burns CM, Bryant DJ, Chalmers BA (2005) Boundary, purpose, and values in work domain models: models of naval command and control. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern A Syst Hum 35(5):603–616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coffey JW, Hoffman RR (2003) Knowledge modelling for the preservation of institutional memory. J Knowl Manag 7(3):38–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornelissen M, Salmon PM, Stanton NA, McClure R (2015) Assessing the ‘system’ in safe systems-based road designs: using cognitive work analysis to evaluate intersection designs. Accid Anal Prev 74:324–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowan FS, Allen JK, Mistree F (2006) Functional modelling in engineering design: a perspectival approach featuring living systems theory. Syst Res Behav Sci 23(3):365–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diaper D, Stanton N (eds) (2004) The handbook of task analysis for human–computer interaction. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah

    Google Scholar 

  • Effken JA, Brewer BB, Logue MD, Gephart SM, Verran JA (2011) Using cognitive work analysis to fit decision support tools to nurse managers’ work flow. Int J Med Inform 80(10):698–707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fowler M (2004) UML distilled, 3rd edn. Addison-Wesley, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Fu QY, Chui YP, Helander MG (2006) Knowledge identification and management in product design. J Knowl Manag 10(6):50–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gero JS (1990) Design prototypes: a knowledge representation schema for design. AI Mag 11(4):26–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Gero JS, Kannengiesser U (2004) The situated function–behaviour–structure framework. Des Stud 25(4):373–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hajdukiewicz JR, Vicente KJ, Doyle DJ, Milgram P, Burns CM (2001) Modelling a medical environment: an ontology for integrated medical informatics design. Int J Med Inform 62(1):79–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ham D-H (2014) A model-based framework for classifying and diagnosing usability problems. Cogn Technol Work 16(3):373–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ham D-H, Yoon WC (2001) Design of information content and layout for process control based on goal-means domain analysis. Cogn Technol Work 3(4):205–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ham D-H, Yoon WC (2007) The training effects of principle knowledge on fault diagnosis performance. Hum Factors Ergon Manuf 17(3):263–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ham D-H, Heo J, Fossick P, Wong W, Park S, Song C, Bradley M (2006) Conceptual framework and models for identifying and organizing usability impact factors of mobile phones. In: Proceedings of the 18th Australia conference on computer–human interaction, pp 261–268

  • Ham D-H, Yoon WC, Han B-T (2008) Experimental study on the effects of visualized functionally abstracted information on process control tasks. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 93(2):254–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ham D-H, Park J, Jung W (2011) A framework-based approach to identifying and organizing the complexity factors of human–system interaction. IEEE Syst J 5(2):213–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins PG (1999) Job shop scheduling: Hybrid intelligent human–computer paradigm. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, The University of Melbourne

  • Hirtz J, Stone RB, McAdams DA, Szykman S, Wood KL (2002) A functional basis for engineering design: reconciling and evolving previous efforts. Res Eng Design 13(2):65–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Ho D, Burns CM (2003) Ecological interface design in aviation domains: Work domain analysis of automated collision detection and avoidance. In: Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society 47th annual meeting, pp 119–123

  • Hoffman RR, Militello LG (2009) Perspectives on cognitive task analysis. Psychology Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollnagel E, Woods DD (2005) Joint cognitive systems: foundations of cognitive systems engineering. Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jansson A, Olsson E, Erlandsson M (2006) Bridging the gap between analysis and design: improving existing driver interfaces with tools from the framework of cognitive work analysis. Cogn Technol Work 8(1):41–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins DP, Stanton NA, Salmon PM (2008) Cognitive work analysis: coping with complexity. Ashgate, Farnham

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins DP, Stanton NA, Salmon PM, Walker GH (2011) Using work domain analysis to evaluate the impact of technological change on the performance of complex socio-technical systems. Theor Issues Ergon Sci 12(1):1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonassen DH, Hung W (2006) Learning to troubleshoot: a new theory-based design architecture. Educ Psychol Rev 18(1):77–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalaidjieva MA, Swanson GA (2004) Intelligence and living systems: a decision-making perspective. Syst Res Behav Sci 21(2):147–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilgore RM, St-Cyr O, Jamieson GA (2009) From work domains to worker competencies: a five-phase CWA. In: Bisantz AM, Burns CM (eds) Applications of cognitive work analysis. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 15–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Koch PN, Peplinski JD, Allen JK, Mistree F (1995) Configuring systems at the functional level of abstraction: a conceptual exposition. Eng Des Autom 1(2):73–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Kossiakoff A, Sweet WN (2002) Systems engineering principles and practice. Wiley-Interscience, Hoboken

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kwon G, Ham D-H, Yoon WC (2007) Evaluation of software usability using scenarios organized by abstraction structure. In: Proceedings of the 14th European conference on cognitive ergonomics, pp 19–22

  • Letsu-Dake E, Ntuen CA (2009) A conceptual model for designing adaptive human–computer interfaces using the living systems theory. Syst Res Behav Sci 26(1):15–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leveson NG (1999) Intent specifications: an approach to building human-centred specifications. IEEE Trans Softw Eng 26(1):15–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lind M (1994) Modelling goals and functions of complex industrial plants. Appl Artif Intell 8(2):259–283

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Lind M (2003) Making sense of the abstraction hierarchy in the power plant domain. Cogn Technol Work 5(2):67–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lintern G (2006) A functional workspace for military analysis of insurgent operations. Int J Ind Ergon 36(5):409–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Little E (2009) On an ontological foundation for work domain analysis. In: Bisantz AM, Burns CM (eds) Applications of cognitive work analysis. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 301–319

    Google Scholar 

  • Louderback WT, Merker SL (2006) Integrating living system process analysis and concrete process analysis with balanced scorecard. Syst Res Behav Sci 23(3):409–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazaeva N, Bisantz AM (2007) On the representation of automation using a work domain analysis. Theor Issues Ergon 8(6):509–530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazaeva N, Bisantz AM (2013) Ecological interface design of a photo camera display: method and example. In: Proceedings of the 57th human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting, pp 1343–1347

  • Mendoza PA, Angelelli A, Lindgren A (2011) Ecological interface design inspired human machine interface for advanced driver assistance systems. IET Intell Transp Syst 5(1):53–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meso P, Troutt MD, Rudnicka J (2002) A review of naturalistic decision making research with some implications for knowledge management. J Knowl Manag 6(1):63–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller JG (1978) Living systems. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller A (2004) A work domain analysis framework for modelling intensive care unit patients. Cogn Technol Work 6(4):207–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naikar N (2013) Work domain analysis: concepts, guidelines, and cases. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Naikar N, Sanderson PM (1999) Work domain analysis for training-system definition and acquisition. Int J Aviat Psychol 9(3):271–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naikar N, Sanderson PM (2001) Evaluating design proposals for complex systems with work domain analysis. Hum Factors 43(4):529–542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naikar N, Pearce B, Drumm D, Sanderson PM (2003) Designing teams for first-of-a-kind complex systems using the initial phases of cognitive work analysis: a case study. Hum Factors 42(2):202–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naikar N, Hopcroft R, Moylan A (2005) Work domain analysis: theoretical concepts and methodology (DSTO-TR-1665). Defence Science and Technology Organization, Victoria

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostaeyen JV, Horenbeek AV, Pintelon L, Duflou JR (2013) A refined typology of product-service systems based on functional hierarchy modelling. J Clean Prod 51:261–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Page LT, Velazquez M, Claudio D (2014) Using abstraction hierarchy as a structured approach in verifying data quality in driving research. In: Proceedings of the 58th human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting, pp 2210–2213

  • Rasmussen J (1985) The role of hierarchical knowledge representation in decision making and system management. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 15(2):234–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen J (1986) Information processing and human–machine interaction: an approach to cognitive engineering. North-Holland, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen J, Pejtersen AM, Goodstein LP (1994) Cognitive systems engineering. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rechard J, Bignon A, Berruet P, Morineau T (2015) Verification and validation of a work domain analysis with turing machine task analysis. Appl Ergon 47:265–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Regan MA, Lintern G, Hutchinson R, Turetschek C (2015) Use of cognitive work analysis for exploration of safety management in the operation of motorcycles and scooters. Accid Anal Prev 74:279–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rich E, Knight K (1991) Artificial intelligence. McGraw-Hill, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  • Rouse WB, Morris NM (1986) On looking into the black box: prospects and limits in the search for mental models. Psychol Bull 100(3):349–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schraagen JM, Chipman SF, Shalin VL (2000) Cognitive task analysis. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah

    Google Scholar 

  • Skyttner L (2005) General systems theory. World Scientific, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  • Staggers N, Norcio AF (1993) Mental models: concepts for human–computer interaction research. Int J Man Mach Stud 38(4):587–605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens N, Salmon P (2014) Safe places for pedestrians: using cognitive work analysis to consider the relationships between the engineering and urban design of footpaths. Accid Anal Prev 72:257–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Upton C, Doherty G (2008) Extending ecological interface design principles: a manufacturing case study. Int J Hum Comput Stud 66(4):271–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vicente KJ (1999a) Cognitive work analysis: toward safe, productive, and healthy computer-based work. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah

    Google Scholar 

  • Vicente KJ (1999b) Wanted: psychologically relevant, device- and event-independent work analysis techniques. Interact Comput 11(3):237–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vicente KJ (2001) HCI in the global knowledge-based economy: designing to support worker adaptation. ACM Trans Comput Hum Interact 7(2):263–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vicente KJ (2002) Ecological interface design: progress and challenges. Hum Factors 44(1):62–78

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Wiig KM (2003) A knowledge model for situation handling. J Knowl Manag 7(5):6–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiig KM (2004) People-focused knowledge management: How effective decision making leads to corporate success. Elsevier Butterworth Heinemann, Burlington

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright H, Mathers C, Walton JPRB (2013) Using visualization for visualization: an ecological interface design approach to inputting data. Comput Graph 37(3):202–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu C, Jeon J, Cafazzo JA, Burns CM (2012) Work domain analysis for designing a radiotherapy system control interface. In: Proceedings of 2012 symposium on human factors and ergonomics in health care, pp 224–228

  • Xie H (2006) Understanding human–work domain interaction: implications for the design of a corporate digital library. J Am Soc Inform Sci Technol 57(1):128–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu W, Dainoff MJ, Mark LS (1999) Facilitate complex search tasks in hypertext by externalizing functional properties of a work domain. Int J Hum Comput Interact 11(3):201–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yim HB, Kim I, Seong PH (2011) An abstraction hierarchy based mobile PC display design in NPP maintenance considering the level of expertise. Nucl Eng Des 241(5):1881–1888

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (Grant Code: NRF-2012R1A1A2042146).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Industrial Engineering, Chonnam National University, 77 Yongbong-ro, Buk-gu, Gwangju, 500-757, South Korea

    Dong-Han Ham

Authors
  1. Dong-Han Ham
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dong-Han Ham.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ham, DH. Modelling work domain knowledge with the combined use of abstraction hierarchy and living systems theory. Cogn Tech Work 17, 575–591 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-015-0338-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-015-0338-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation