Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Video-assisted surgery: suggestions for failure prevention in laparoscopic cholecystectomy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cognition, Technology & Work Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Surgery differs from other medical specialties in its execution. It is often complex and includes considerable individual variations. Observing problems in operating theatres (OT) allows for the identification of system failures, which should be defined for learning purposes to increase patient safety and enhance general safety culture within hospital organizations. This study evaluates a common video-assisted surgical procedure, laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) through failure analysis. The profile of the LC procedure and failure sources is presented. Data consisted of video observations and interviews concerning twelve LC operations performed at a day surgery unit. All operations were teaching sessions. Qualitative analysis was undertaken. Through task analysis, specialist interviews and failure identification, a failure profile of LC was produced. Twenty failure types were identified, and failures were, for example, remote attention towards ergonomics, novice’s skill failures, inadequate supervision and unnecessary risk-taking caused by tight operating schedules. The results showed that the importance of working principles should be emphasized. The failure profile of LC revealed three phases featuring multiple failures: dissecting the peritoneal covering; identifying, sealing and cutting the cystic duct and cystic artery; and detaching the gallbladder from the hepatic bed and inspecting the hepatic bed. This study offers information for hospital organizations about the current state of surgical work and surgical skills learning. This information could be exploited in the development of system defences: error prevention mechanisms through investing in the redesign of work tasks and working methods; as well as reinforcing education and training for enhancing patient safety in OT.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aggarwal R, Crochet P, Dias A, Misra A, Ziprin P, Darzi A (2009) Development of a virtual reality training curriculum for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 96:1086–1093

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barach P (2000) Reporting and preventing medical mishaps: lessons from non-medical near miss reporting systems. Br Med J 320:759–763

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berner ES, Graber ML (2008) Overconfidence as a cause of diagnostic error in medicine. Am J Med 121:2–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonrath EM, Dedy NJ, Zevin B, Grantcharov TP (2013) Defining technical errors in laparoscopic surgery: a systematic review. Surg Endosc 27:2678–2691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunner WC, Korndorffer JR Jr, Sierra R, Massarweh NN, Dunne JB, Yau CL, Scott DJ (2004) Laparoscopic virtual reality training: Are 30 repetitions enough? J Surg Res 122:150–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carthey J, de Leval MR, Wright DJ, Farewell VT, Reason JT (2003) Behavioural markers of surgical excellence. Saf Sci 41:409–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catchpole K (2009) Observing failures in successful orthopaedic surgery. In: Flin RH, Mitchell L (eds) Safer surgery: analysing behaviour in the operating theatre, xxvi, 456p edn. Ashgate Pub, Farnham, pp 321–339

    Google Scholar 

  • Catchpole K, Giddings A, Hirst G, Dale T, Peek G, de Leval M (2008) A method for measuring threats and errors in surgery. Cogn Technol Work 10:295–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catchpole K, Giddings A, De Leval M, Peek G, Godden P, Utley M, Gallivan S, Hirst G, Dale T (2006) Identification of systems failures in successful paediatric cardiac surgery. Ergonomics 49:567–588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conrad J, Shah A, Divino C, Schluender S, Gurland B, Shlasko E, Szold A (2006) The role of mental rotation and memory scanning on the performance of laparoscopic skills. Surg Endosc 20:504–510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuschieri A (2006) Nature of human error—implications for surgical practice. Ann Surg 244:642–648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Leval MR, Carthey J, Wright DJ, Farewell VT, Reason JT (2000) Human factors and cardiac surgery: a multicenter study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 119:661–672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeLucia PR, Mather RD, Griswold JA, Mitra S (2006) Toward the improvement of image-guided interventions for minimally invasive surgery: three factors that affect performance. Hum Factors 48:23–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emam T, Hanna G, Cuschieri A (2002) Ergonomic principles of task alignment, visual display, and direction of execution of laparoscopic bowel suturing. Surg Endosc 16:267–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson KA (2004) Deliberate practice and the acquisition and maintenance of expert performance in medicine and related domains. Acad Med 79:70–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flin R, Yule S, McKenzie L, Paterson-Brown S, Maran N (2006) Attitudes to teamwork and safety in the operating theatre. Surgeon 4:145–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flin RH, Mitchell L (2009) Safer surgery: analysing behaviour in the operating theatre. Ashgate Pub, Farnham

    Google Scholar 

  • Fried GM, Feldman LS, Klassen DR (2005) Cholecystectomy and common bileduct exploration. In: Souba WW, Fink MP, Jurkovich GJ, Kaiser LP, Pearce WH, Pemberton JH, Soper NJ (eds) ACS surgery: principles and practice, 6th edn. Decker, Hamilton, pp 729–751

    Google Scholar 

  • Gawande AA (2003) Analysis of errors reported by surgeons at three teaching hospitals. Surgery 133:614–621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guerlain S, Turrentine B, Adams R, Calland JF (2004) Using video data for the analysis and training of medical personnel. Cogn Technol Work 6:131–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Healey AN, Olsen S, Davis R, Vincent CA (2008) A method for measuring work interference in surgical teams. Cogn Technol Work 10:305–312

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollnagel E (2012) Task analysis, why, what and how. In: Salvendy G (ed) Handbook of human factors and ergonomics, 4 edition edn. Wiley, New Jersey, pp 385–396

    Google Scholar 

  • Ikonen TS, Antikainen T, Silvennoinen M, Isojärvi J, Mäkinen E, Scheinin TM (2012) Virtual reality simulator training of laparoscopic cholecystectomies—a systematic review. Scand J Surg 101:5–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jänes A (2006) Clipless laparoscopic cholecystectomy with harmonic. Euromed Communications, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Leape LL (1994) Error in medicine. JAMA 272:1851–1856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lomanto D, Cheah W (2004) Manual of laparoscopic surgery. http://www.misc-asia.com/booklet/lap_%20manual_%20basic%20_skill_full.pdf

  • Nuzzo G, Giuliante F, Ardito F (2008) Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. In: Borzellino G, Cordiano C (eds) Biliary lithiasis 2008 basic science, current diagnosis and management. Springer, Milan, pp 255–309

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor T, Papanikolaou V, Keogh I (2010) Safe surgery, the human factors approach. Surgeon 8:93–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park J, Woodrow SI, Reznick RK, Beales J, MacRae HM (2010) Observation, reflection, and reinforcement: surgery faculty members’ and residents’ perceptions of how they learned professionalism. Acad Med 85:134–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patel VL, Arocha JF, Kaufman DR (2001) A primer on aspects of cognition for medical informatics. J Am Med Inform Assoc 8:324–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patton MQ (2002) Qualitative evaluation and research methods. (3rd edition) SAGE Publications, Newbury Park

  • Ponsky JL (1991) Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 161:393–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reason JT (1997) Managing the risks of organizational accidents, vol 6. Ashgate Aldershot, Farnham

    Google Scholar 

  • Reason J (2000) Human error: models and management. BMJ 320:768–770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seymour N, Gallagher A, Roman S, O’Brien M, Andersen D, Satava R (2004) Analysis of errors in laparoscopic surgical procedures. Surg Endosc 18:592–595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silvennoinen M, Mecklin J, Saariluoma P, Antikainen T (2009) Expertise and skill in minimally invasive surgery. Scand J Surg 98:209–213

    Google Scholar 

  • Spath PL (2011) Error reduction in health care: a systems approach to improving patient safety. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang B, Hanna G, Joice P, Cuschieri A (2004) Identification and categorization of technical errors by observational clinical human reliability assessment (OCHRA) during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Arch Surg 139:1215–1220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tynjälä P (2008) Perspectives into learning at the workplace. Educ Res Rev 3(2):130–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss von, Torney M, Dell-Kuster S, Mechera R, Rosenthal R, Langer I (2012) The cost of surgical training: analysis of operative time for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 26:2579–2586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wauben L, Grevenstein Wv, Goossens R, der Meulen Fv, Lange J (2011) Operative notes do not reflect reality in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 98:1431–1436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wauben L, Van Veelen M, Gossot D, Goossens R (2006) Application of ergonomic guidelines during minimally invasive surgery: a questionnaire survey of 284 surgeons. Surg Endosc 20:1268–1274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinger MB, Slagle J (2002) Human factors research in anesthesia patient safety techniques to elucidate factors affecting clinical task performance and decision making. J Am Med Inform Assoc 9:58–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinger MB, Herndon OW, Zornow MH, Paulus MP, Gaba DM, Dallen LT (1994) An objective methodology for task analysis and workload assessment in anesthesia providers. Anesthesiology 80:77–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiao Y, Hu P, Moss J, de Winter JCF, Venekamp D, Mackenzie CF, Seagull FJ, Perkins S (2008) Opportunities and challenges in improving surgical work flow. Cogn Technol Work 10:313–321

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Xiao D, Jakimowicz JJ, Albayrak A, Goossens R (2012) Ergonomic factors on task performance in laparoscopic surgery training. Appl Ergon 43:548–553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ziv A, Wolpe PR, Small SD, Glick S (2003) Simulation-based medical education: an ethical imperative. Acad Med 78:783–788

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Central Finland Health Care District.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Science and Information Systems and Agora Center, University of Jyväskylä, P.O. Box 35, 40014, Jyväskylä, Finland

    Minna Silvennoinen

  2. Department of Surgery, Jyväskylä Central Hospital, Jyväskylä, Finland

    Teuvo Antikainen & Jukka-Pekka Mecklin

Authors
  1. Minna Silvennoinen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Teuvo Antikainen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jukka-Pekka Mecklin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Minna Silvennoinen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Silvennoinen, M., Antikainen, T. & Mecklin, JP. Video-assisted surgery: suggestions for failure prevention in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Cogn Tech Work 17, 145–155 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-014-0317-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-014-0317-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation