Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Intelligent planning and the design of a new risk-based, intelligent flight plan

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cognition, Technology & Work Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A safe flight starts with effective performance of the pre-flight flight planning and briefing task. However, several problems related to the execution of this task can be identified. Potentially, the introduction of an improved flight plan provides an opportunity to improve the quality and availability of information provided to Flight Crew, thereby enhancing the quality of crew briefings. The proposed risk-based, intelligent flight plan is designed from the perspective of the current operational concept (e.g. fixed routes and ATC managerial role for separation), and associated airline Flight Planning and Dispatch functions. In this case, the focus is sharing information across specific airline stakeholders (e.g. Flight Operations Management and Safety functions) and Maintenance, to support a safe and efficient flight operation. Overall, the introduction of this new flight plan will result in the definition of new operational and organisational processes, along with a new way of performing the pre-flight, planning and briefing task. It is anticipated that this will impact positively on the operational and safety outcome of the flight.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bannon L, Bødker S (1991) Beyond the interface: encountering artifacts in use. In: Carroll JM (ed) Designing interaction: psychology at the human-computer interface. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 227–253

    Google Scholar 

  • Bødker S, Burr J (2002) The design collaboratorium—a place for usability design. ACM Trans Comput Hum Interact 9(2):152–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bødker S, Ehn P, Romberger S, Sjöögren D (eds.). (1985) Graffiti 7-the UTOPIA project: an alternative in text and images. Swedish Center for Working Life, Stockholm, Royal Institute of Technology, and Aarhus, Stockholm, University of Aarhus, Denmark

  • Cahill J, Losa G (2007) The design of cockpit task support tools. In: Proceedings of the European conference on cognitive ergonomics 2007 (ECCE 2007), 28–31 August, Covent Garden

  • Cahill J, Losa G (2008) Enhancing human performance and overall flight safety through improvements in airline system information flow. In: 28th conference of the European association for aviation psychology, October 27–31, 2008, Valencia

  • Cahill J, McDonald N (2006) HILAS Flight operations research: a new framework for system performance monitoring. In: Proceedings of the international conference on human-computer interaction in aeronautics (HCI-Aero 2006). Seattle, 20–22 September

  • Cahill J, Mc Donald N, Ulfvengren P, Young F, Ramos Y, Losa G (2007) HILAS flight operations research: development of risk/safety management, process improvement and task support tools. In: Harris D (ed) Engin. Psychol and Cog. Ergonomics, HCI 2007, LNAI 4562. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 648–657

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll JM (1995) The scenario perspective on system development. In: Carroll M (ed) Scenario-based design: envisioning work and technology in system development. Wiley, New York, pp 1–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll JM (2000) Making use: scenario-based design of human-computer interactions. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrison J (2007) The SESAR concept of operations. Retrieved May 15, 2010 from, http://www.airtn.eu/documents/AirTN/AirTNForum1-6-Derisson.pdf

  • Doherty SM, Wickens CD (2001) Effects of preview, prediction, frame of reference and display gain in tunnel in the sky displays. In: Proceedings of the eleventh international symposium on aviation psychology. Ohio State University, Columbus

  • Dutcher JW (2003) Weather analysis checklist for aircraft accident investigation. Retrieved June 15, 2008 from, http://www.johndutcher.com/wxinvestigation.html

  • Dutcher JW (2005) Heavy weather. Civil Aviation Safety Authority—Australia—Flight Safety Australia, 9 (6), 40–41

  • Dutcher JW, Doiran M (2008) Weather risk management through a systematic approach to the investigation of weather events. In: Proceedings of the ISASI 2008 Conference, Halifax

  • Eurocontrol (2009) Single European Sky. Retrieved 10 June 2009 from http://www.eurocontrol.int/ses/public/standard_page/sk_ses.html

  • Federal Aviation Administration (1996) The interfaces between flight crews and modern flight deck system: report by the human factors team

  • Funk K, Braune R (1999) The agenda manager: a knowledge-based system to facilitate the management of flight deck activities. In: Proceedings of the 1999 world aviation congress, 19–21 October 1999, San Francisco

  • Group of Personalities. (2001) European aeronautics: a vision for 2020. Meeting society’s needs and winning global leadership. Retrieved 10 June 2009 from http://www.acare4europe.org

  • Helmreich RL (1999a) Ten years of change: crew resource management 1989–1999. In: Proceedings of the fourth ICAO global safety and human factors symposium. International Civil Aviation organisation, Santiago, pp. 139–149

  • Helmreich RL (1999b) CRM training primary line of defence against threats to flight safety, including human error. Int Civil Aviat Organ (ICAO) J 54(5): 6–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Helmreich RL, Foushee HC (1993) Why crew resource management? empirical and theoretical bases of human factors training in aviation. In: Wiener E, Kanki B, Helmreich R (eds) Cockpit resource management. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 3–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Helmreich RL, Merritt AC (2000) Safety and error management: the role of crew resource management. In: Hayward BJ, Lowe AR (eds) Aviation resource management. Ashgate, Aldershot, pp 107–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Helmreich RL, Musson DM (2000) The University of Texas threat and error model. Retrieved 10 June 2009 from: http://www.bmj.com/misc/bmj.320.7237.781/sld001.htm

  • Helmreich RL, Klinect JR, Wilhelm JA (1999) Models of threat, error, and CRM in flight operations. In: Proceedings of the tenth international symposium on aviation psychology. The Ohio State University, Columbus, pp. 677–682

  • Helmreich RL, Merritt AC, Wilhelm JA (1999b) The evolution of crew resource management training in commercial aviation. Int J Aviat Psychol 9(1):19–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helmreich RL, Klinect JR, Wilhelm JA (2001) System safety and threat and error management: the line operations safety audit (LOSA). In: Proceedings of the eleventh international symposium on aviation psychology. The Ohio State University, Columbus, pp. 1–6

  • Helmreich RL, Wilhelm JA, Klinect JR, Merritt AC (2001b) Culture, error and crew resource management. In: Salas E, Bowers CA, Edens E (eds) Improving teamwork in organizations: applications of resource management training. Hillsdale, Erlbaum, pp 305–331

    Google Scholar 

  • HILAS (2005) Annex 1: description of work. project number 516181. Funded by European Commission—Sixth Framework Programme

  • Hutchins E (1995a) Cognition in the wild. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchins E (1995b) How a cockpit remembers its speed. Cogn Sci 19:265–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Civil Aviation Organisation (2006) Safety management manual (Doc 9859 -AN/460). International Civil Aviation Organisation, Montreal

    Google Scholar 

  • International Civil Aviation Organisation (2009) Safety management manual: 2nd edn. (Doc 9859). International Civil Aviation Organisation, Montreal

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen RS (1995) Pilot judgement and crew resource management. VT: Ashgate, Burlington

  • Johnson WW, Battiste V, Bochow SH (1999) A cockpit display designed to enable limited flight deck separation responsibility. In: Proceedings of the SAE/AIAA 1999 World Aviation Conference. Anaheim

  • Johnston N (1993) CRM: cross-cultural perspectives. In: Wiener E, Kanki B, Helmreich R (eds) Cockpit resource management. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 367–398

    Google Scholar 

  • Joint Aviation Authority (1998) JAA administrative & guidance material: section four: operations, part three: temporary guidance leaflets (JAR-OPS). Leaflet No. 5: crew resource management—flight crew

  • Klinect JR, Wilhelm JA, Helmreich RL (1999) Threat and error management: data from line operations safety audits. In: Proceedings of the tenth international symposium on aviation psychology. The Ohio State University, Columbus, pp. 683–688

  • Klinect JR, Murray P, Merritt A, Helmreich R (2003) Line operations safety audit (LOSA): definition and operating characteristics. In: Proceedings of the twelfth international symposium on aviation psychology. The Ohio State University, Dayton, pp. 663–668

  • Loukopoulos LD (2009) Time critical risk assessment and management. Technical report, CERTH (HIT), Hellenic Institute of Transport, Center for Research and Technology Hellas

  • McDonald (2009) HILAS system processes—internal document. Trinity College Dublin, Dublin

    Google Scholar 

  • Merritt AC, Helmreich RL (1996) Human factors on the flight deck: the influence of national culture. J Cross Cult Psychol 27(1):5–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller M (1991) PICTIVE—an exploration in participatory design. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems: reaching through technology. Association for Computer Machinery, New Orleans, pp. 225–231

  • Orasanu J, Dismukes K, Fischer U (1993) Decision errors in the cockpit. In: Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society 37th annual meeting, vol. 1. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Santa Monica, pp. 363–367

  • Solodilova I, Johnston P (2004) Mind references in the glass cockpit: an experimental study. In: Proceedings of HCI Aero 2004. ACM Press and the European Institute of Cognitive Sciences and Engineering, Toulouse

  • Solodilova I, Lintern G, Johnston N (2003) The modern commercial cockpit as a multi-dimensional, information-action workspace. In: Jensen R (ed.) Proceedings of the 12th international symposium on aviation psychology. The Ohio State University, Dayton, pp. 1096–1101

  • Stone R, Babcock G (1988) Airline pilot’s perspective. In: Wiener, Nagel (eds) Human factors in aviation. Academic Press, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Theunissen E, Stassen HG, van Willigen D (1998) Integrated design of spatial navigation displays. Paper presented at the 7th IFAC/IFIP/IFORS/IEA symposium on analysis, design and evaluation of man-machine systems, September 16–18, Kyoto

  • Turner BA (1978) Man-made disasters. Wykeham Publications, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner BA, Pidgeon NF (1997) Man-made disasters. Butterworth-Heinemann, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick KE, Roberts KH (1993) Collective mind in organisations: heedful interrelating on flight decks. Adm Sci Q 38:357–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weick KE, Sutcliffe KM, Obstfeld D (1999) Organizing for high reliability: processes of collective mindfulness. Res Organ Behav 21:81–123

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Aerospace Psychology Research Group (APRG), School of Psychology, Trinity College Dublin (TCD), College Green, Dublin 2, Ireland

    Joan Cahill & Nick Mc Donald

  2. Flight Safety Department, Human Factors and CRM Unit, Flight Ops Direction, Iberia, AZI N1, Edificio 114, 28042, Barajas, Madrid, Spain

    Captain Gabriel Losa

Authors
  1. Joan Cahill
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nick Mc Donald
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Captain Gabriel Losa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joan Cahill.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cahill, J., Donald, N.M. & Losa, C.G. Intelligent planning and the design of a new risk-based, intelligent flight plan. Cogn Tech Work 13, 43–66 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-010-0154-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-010-0154-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation