Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Designing decision support in an evolving sociotechnical enterprise

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cognition, Technology & Work Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Modern manufacturing facilities are subject to organisational, technological, engineering and market constraints. The combination of these factors allows them to be described as sociotechnical enterprises. Control of these enterprises is distributed between human and automated agents who collaborate as part of a joint cognitive system. One of the challenges facing these industries is a need to evolve operations while maintaining stable performance. Cognitive Systems Engineering (CSE) provides a range of analytical frameworks that can be used to study the effects of change on sociotechnical systems. However, the scale of these enterprises and the range of decision-making styles involved make the selection of an appropriate framework difficult. A critical review of both positivist and hermeneutic approaches to cognitive systems research is provided. Following this a cognitive engineering process is outlined that uses a mixed model approach to describe system functionality, understand the implications of change and inform the design of cognitive artefacts that support system control. A case study examines the introduction of pervasive automation in the semiconductor manufacturing industry and is used to demonstrate the utility of this process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bertin J (1983) Semiology of graphics. The University of Wisconsin Press, Madison

    Google Scholar 

  • Beyer H, Holtzblatt K (1998) Contextual design: defining customer-centered systems. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Blandford A, Furniss D (2005) DiCoT: a methodology for applying distributed cognition to the design of teamworking systems. In: Gilroy S, Harrison M (eds) Proc. DSVIS 2005. LNCS, vol 3941. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 26–38

  • Burns CM, Hajdukiewicz JR (2004) Ecological interface design. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Card SK, Mackinlay J, Schneiderman B (1999) Readings in information visualization: using vision to think. Morgan-Kaufman, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Christoffersen K, Woods DD (2002) How to make automated systems team players. Adv Human Perform Cogn Eng Res 2:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gamble PR, Blackwell J (2001) Knowledge management: a state of the art guide. Kogan Page, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldratt E, Cox J (1986) Creative output books. The Goal, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins PG (1998). Extending cognitive work analysis to manufacturing scheduling. In: Calder P, Thomas B (eds) Proceedings of Australian computer human interaction conference, OzCHI’98, November 30–December 4, Adelaide. IEEE, New York, pp 236–243

  • Hollan J, Hutchins E, Kirsh D (2000) Distributed cognition: towards a new foundation for human–computer interaction research. ACM Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction (TOCHI). ACM Press, New York

  • Hollnagel E, Woods DD (2005) Joint cognitive systems: foundations of cognitive systems engineering. Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchins E (1995) Cognition in the Wild. MIT Press, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamieson GA, Miller CA, Ho WH, Vicente KJ (2007) Integrating task- and work domain-based work analyses in ecological interface design: a process control case study. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern A 37(6):887–905

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaptelinin V (1995) Activity theory: implications for human-computer interaction Context and consciousness: activity theory and human–computer interaction, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, pp 103–116

  • Klein GA, Orasanu J, Calderwood R, Zsambok CE (eds) (1993) Decision making in action: models and methods. Ablex Publishing Corporation, Norwood

    Google Scholar 

  • Lind M (1999) Plant modeling for human supervisory control. Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control 21(4/5):171–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Marmaras N, Nathanael D (2005) Cognitive engineering practice: melting theory into reality. Theor Issues Ergon Sci 6:109–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore G (1965) Cramming more components onto integrated circuits. Electronics 38(8):114–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Mouli C, Srinivasan K (2004) Intel automation and its role in process development and high volume manufacturing. In: Graf O (ed) Proceedings advanced semiconductor manufacturing conference, ASMC ’04, pp 313–320

  • Nardi, B.A (1995) Context and consciousness: activity theory and human-computer interaction. Massachusetts Institute of Technology

  • Norros L, Nuutinen M (2002) The concept of the core-task and the analysis of working practices. In: Borham N, Samurcay R, Fischer M (eds) Work process knowledge. Routledge, London, pp 25–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry M (1999) The application of individually and socially distributed cognition in workplace studies: two peas in a pod? In: Bagnara S (ed) Proceedings of the European Conference on cognitive science—ECCS ‘99, 27th–30th October, Certosa di Pontignano, Siena, Italy, pp 87–92

  • Rasmussen J (1985) The role of hierarchical knowledge representation in decision making and system management. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern SMC.15(2):234–243

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen J (1986) Information processing and human–machine interaction: an approach to cognitive engineering. North-Holland, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen J (1983). Skills rules and knowledge: signals, signs and symbols, and other distinctions in human performance models. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern SMC-13(3):257–266

    Google Scholar 

  • Upton C, Doherty G (2005) Adapting the ADS for high volume manufacturing. INTERACT Rome, Italy. Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Upton C, Doherty G (2007) Integrating ecological interface design with the visualisation reference model. In: Proceedings of 25th European conference on cognitive ergonomics, pp 175–178

  • Upton C, Doherty G (2006) Visual representation of complex information structures in high volume manufacturing. IFIP conference on human work interaction design, Madeira, Portugal, Springer, pp 45–63 1038–1041

  • Upton C, Doherty G (2008) Extending ecological interface design principles: a manufacturing case study. Int J Hum Comp Stud 66(4):271–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vicente KJ (1999) Cognitive work analysis: toward safe, productive and healthy computer-based work. Erlbaum and Associates, Mahwah

    Google Scholar 

  • Vicente KJ, Rasmussen J (1992) Ecological interface design: theoretical foundations. Systems, Man and Cybernetics. IEEE Trans 22(4):589–606

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong WBL, Sallis PJ, O’Hare D (1998) The ecological approach to interface design: applying the abstraction hierarchy to intentional domains. In: Proceedings of the Eighth Australian conference on computer-human interaction OzCHI’98, IEEE Computer Society Press, Australia, pp 144–150

  • Woods DD (1998) Designs are hypotheses about how artifacts shape cognition and collaboration. Ergonomics 41(6):168–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woods DD, Sarter N (2000) Learning from Automation Surprises and Going Sour Accidents. In: Sarter N, Amalberti R (eds) Cognitive engineering in the aviation domain. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, pp 327–254

  • Woods DD (1985) Knowledge based development of graphic display systems. In: Proceedings of the human factors society 29th annual meeting, Human Factors Soc

  • Woods DD, Johannesen LJ, Cook RI, Sarter NB (1994) Behind human error: cognitive systems, computers and hindsight. CSERIAC, Columbus

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Antwerp K (2004) Automation in a semiconductor Fab, Semiconductor International, December, 2004 [Online] Available http://www.semiconductor.net/article/CA483805.html [Accessed 20/07/2007]

  • Zhang J, Norman DA (1994) Representations in distributed cognitive tasks. Cogn Sci 18:87–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work has been funded through an Intel Ireland Research Scholarship. The authors would like to thank Donal Sheerin and the manufacturing operations team at Intel® Intel Ireland, Leixlip, Co. Kildare, for their valuable time and assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Connor Upton.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Upton, C., Doherty, G., Gleeson, F. et al. Designing decision support in an evolving sociotechnical enterprise. Cogn Tech Work 12, 13–30 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-008-0124-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-008-0124-1

Keywords

Navigation