Skip to main content
Log in

A function-centred approach to joint driver-vehicle system design

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cognition, Technology & Work Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Throughout the history human–machine systems design has had a technological bias in the sense that design for technology came first and design for humans as a distant second. Over the years this situation became untenable because the growing system complexity made a decomposition approach to design inadequate. Seeing that technology-centered design had failed, the pendulum swung to the other side taking the human as the center of things. Yet human-centered design is just as inadequate as machine-centered design, since it implies a dichotomy where one part of the system is seen as opposed to the other. This applies not least to the case of automotive environments, where the interaction has a clear purpose, namely safely to negotiate the traffic. Design should therefore embrace a function-centered view where the focus is the joint driver-vehicle system. Design should serve to further the purposes or goals of the joint system, i.e., to be in control vis-à-vis the dynamic traffic environment, by taking the relative strengths and limitations of the components into account and by describing the system on multiple levels.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • EC (1999) Commission Recommendation of 21 December 1999 on safe and efficient in-vehicle information and communication systems: A European statement of principles on human machine interface (notified under document number C(1999) 4786)

  • Gibson JJ, Crooks LE (1938) A theoretical field-analysis of automobile driving. Am J Psychol 51(3):453–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollnagel E (ed) (2003) Handbook of cognitive task design. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah

  • Hollnagel E, Woods DD (2005) Joint cognitive systems: foundations of cognitive systems engineering. Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollnagel E, Nåbo A, Lau I (2003) A systemic model for driver-in-control. Public Policy Center, University of Iowa, Park City

  • McRuer DT, Allen RW, Weir DH, Klein RH (1977) New results in driver steering control. Hum Factors 19:381–397

    Google Scholar 

  • Michon JA (1985). A critical view of driver behavior models. What do we know, what should we do? In: Evans L, Schwing R (eds) Human behavior and traffic safety. Plenum press, New York, pp 485–525

    Google Scholar 

  • Winograd T, Woods DD (1997) The challenge of human-centered design. In: Flanagan J, Huang T, Jones P, Kasif S (eds) Human-centered systems: Information, interactivity, and intelligence. National Science Foundation, Washington DC

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erik Hollnagel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hollnagel, E. A function-centred approach to joint driver-vehicle system design. Cogn Tech Work 8, 169–173 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-006-0032-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-006-0032-1

Keywords

Navigation