Skip to main content
Log in

Problem detection

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cognition, Technology & Work Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Problem detection is the process by which people first become concerned that events may be taking an unexpected and undesirable direction that potentially requires action. Previous accounts [e.g., Cowan (Acad Manage Rev 11(4):763–776, 1986)] described problem detection as the accumulation of discrepancies until a threshold was reached. In reviewing incidents taken from a variety of natural settings, we found that discrepancy accumulation did not apply to the incidents we reviewed, because (a) cues to problems may be subtle and context-dependent, and (b) what counts as a discrepancy depends on the problem-solver’s experience and the stance taken in interpreting the situation. In many cases, detecting a problem is equivalent to reconceptualizing the situation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson JR (1993) Problem solving and learning. Am Psychol 48(1):35–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bechara A, Damasio H, Tranel D, Damasio AR (1997) Deciding advantageously before knowing the advantageous strategy. Science 275:1293–1295

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Billings R, Milburn T, Schaalman M (1980) A model of crisis perception: a theoretical and empirical analysis. Admin Sci Q 25:300–316

    Google Scholar 

  • Chow R, Christoffersen K, Woods DD (2000) A model of communication in support of distributed anomaly response and replanning. In: Proceedings of the XIVth Triennial Congress of the International Ergonomics Association and 44th annual meeting of the human factors and ergonomics society, vol 1, pp 34–37

  • Christoffersen K, Woods DD (2003) Making sense of change: extracting events from dynamic process data (Report ERGO-CSEL 01-TR-02). Institute for Ergonomics/Cognitive Systems Engineering Laboratory, Columbus

    Google Scholar 

  • Christoffersen K, Woods DD, Blike GT (2001) Extracting event patterns from telemetry data. In: Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society 45th annual meeting, Minneapolis/St. Paul, 8–12 October 2001. HFES, Santa Monica, pp 409–413

  • Cohen MS, Freeman JT, Thompson B (1998) Critical thinking skills in tactical decision making: a model and a training method. In: Cannon-Bowers J, Salas E (eds) Making decisions under stress: implications for individual and team training. APA Press, Washington, pp 155–189

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook RI, Woods DD, McDonald JS (1991) Human performance in anesthesia: a corpus of cases. Cognitive Systems Engineering Laboratory Report, prepared for the Anesthesia Patient Safety Foundation, April 1991

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowan DA (1986) Developing a process model of problem recognition. Acad Manage Rev 11(4):763–776

    Google Scholar 

  • Crandall B, Calderwood R (1989) Clinical assessment skills of experienced neonatal intensive care nurses (No. Contract 1 R43 NR0191101 for The National Center for Nursing, NIH). Klein Associates, Fairborn

  • Crandall B, Getchell-Reiter K (1993) Critical decision method: a technique for eliciting concrete assessment indicators from the “intuition” of NICU nurses. Adv Nurs Sci 16(1):42–51

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Davis GA (1973) Psychology of problem solving. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • De Keyser V, Woods DD (1993) Fixation errors: failures to revise situation assessment in dynamic and risky systems. In: Colombo AG, Saiz de Bustamente A (eds) Advanced systems in reliability modeling. Kluwer, Norwell

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey J (1896) The reflex arc concept in psychology. Psychol Rev 3:357–370

    Google Scholar 

  • Dominguez C (1998) Expertise in laparoscopic surgery: anticipation and affordances. Paper presented at the 4th naturalistic decision making conference, Warrenton, VA

    Google Scholar 

  • Dominguez CO, Flach JM, McDermott PL, McKellar DM, Dunn M (2004) The conversion decision in laparoscopic surgery: knowing your limits and limiting your risks. In: Smith K, Shanteau J, Johnson P (eds) Psychological explorations of competence in decision making, Cambridge University Press, NY, pp 7–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs A (1967) Inside bureaucracy. Little and Brown, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncker K (1945) On problem solving. In: JF Dashiell (ed) Psychological monographs. Translated by LS Lees 58(5, Whole No. 270), pp 1–113

  • Engdahl RA, Keating RJ (1995) Strategic problem-solving process: a comprehensive model and the need for more focused attention on consensus seeking. Organ Develop J 13(3):80–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Feltovich PJ, Coulson RL, Spiro RJ (2001) Learners’ (mis)understanding of important and difficult concepts: a challenge to smart machines in education. In: Forbus KD, Feltovich PJ (eds) Smart machines in education. AAAI/MIT Press, Menlo Park

    Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan JC (1954) The critical incident technique. Psychol Bull 51:327–358

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Forbus KD, de Kleer J (1993) Building problem solvers. The MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentner D, Stevens AL (eds) (1983) Mental models. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson JJ, Crooks LE (1938) A theoretical field-analysis of automobile driving. Am J Psychol 51:453–471

    Google Scholar 

  • Gleick J (1987) Chaos: making a new science. Viking Penguin, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Greeno JG, Simon HA (1988) Problem solving and reasoning. In: Atkinson RC, Herrnstein RJ, Lindzey G, Luce RD (eds) Stevens’ handbook of experimental psychology: vol 2, Learning and cognition. Wiley, New York

  • Guerlain S, Smith PJ, Obradovich J, Rudmann S, Strohm P, Smith JW, Svirbely J, Sachs L (1999) Interactive critiquing as a form of decision support: an empirical evaluation. Hum Factors 41(1):72–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes JR (1981) The complete problem solver. The Franklin Institute Press, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Höffding H (1889) Ueber Wiederkennen, Assocation und psychische Activat. Vierteljahrsschrift fur wissenschaftlische Philosophie 13:420–458

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman RR, Crandall BW, Shadbolt NR (1998) Use of the critical decision method to elicit expert knowledge: a case study in cognitive task analysis methodology. Hum Factors 40(2):254–276

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson-Laird PN (1983) Mental models: towards a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness (Cognitive Science, No. 6). Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaempf GL, Klein G, Thordsen ML, Wolf S (1996) Decision making in complex command-and-control environments. Hum Factors 38:220–231

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein G (1997) Developing expertise in decision making. Thinking Reasoning 3(4):337–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein GA, Crandall BW (1995) The role of mental simulation in naturalistic decision making. In: Hancock P, Flach J, Caird J, Vicente K (eds) Local applications of the ecological approach to human–machine systems, vol 2. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, pp 324–358

  • Klein GA, Hoffman R (1993) Seeing the invisible: perceptual/cognitive aspects of expertise. In: Rabinowitz M (ed) Cognitive science foundations of instruction. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, pp 203–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein G, Hutton R (1995) The innovators: high-impact researchers at the Armstrong Laboratory Human Engineering Division, Armstrong Laboratory (U) (AL/CF-FR-1995–0027). United States Air Force Armstrong Laboratory, Wright Patterson AFB, OH

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein GA, Calderwood R, Clinton-Cirocco A (1988) Rapid decision making on the fireground (Technical Report No. DTIC No. AD-A199492, http://www.dtic.mil). US Army Research Institute, Alexander

  • Klein GA, Calderwood R, MacGregor D (1989) Critical decision method for eliciting knowledge. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 19(3):462–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein G, Ross KG, Moon BM, Klein DE, Hoffman RR, Hollnagel E (2003) Macrocognition. IEEE Intell Syst 18(3):81–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein G, Phillips JK, Rall E, Peluso DA (2004) A data/frame theory of sensemaking (submitted for publication)

  • Klinger DW, Militello LG (2002) Designing for performance: a cognitive systems engineering and cognitive task analysis approach to the modification of the AWACS weapons director interface (submitted 10/2001)

    Google Scholar 

  • Layton C, Smith PJ, McCoy CE (1994) Design of a cooperative problem-solving system for en-route flight planning: an empirical evaluation. Hum Factors 36(1):94–119

    Google Scholar 

  • MacCrimmon KR (1973) Managerial decision-making. In: McGuire JW (ed) Contemporary management: issues and viewpoints. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, pp 445–495

    Google Scholar 

  • Mack A (2003) Inattentional blindness: looking without seeing. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 12(5):180–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mumaw RJ, Roth EM, Vicente KJ, Burns CM (2000) There is more to monitoring a nuclear power plant than meets the eye. Hum Factors 42(1):36–55

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Newell A, Simon HA (1972) Human problem solving. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson WA, Sarter NB (2001) Management by consent in human–machine systems: when and why it breaks down. Hum Factors 43(2):255–266

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Perrow C (1984) Normal accidents: living with high-risk technologies. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Pliske RM, Crandall B, Klein G (2004) Competence in weather forecasting. In: Smith K, Shanteau J, Johnson P (eds) Psychological investigations of competence in decision making. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 40–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Polya G (1957) How to solve it, 2nd edn. A Doubleday Anchor Book, Garden City

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth EM, Woods DD, Pople HE (1992) Cognitive simulation as a tool for cognitive task analysis. Ergonomics 35:1163–1198

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rubinstein MF (1975) Patterns of problem solving. Prentice-Hall, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt JF, Klein G (1996) Fighting in the fog: dealing with battlefield uncertainty. Mar Corps Gaz 80:62–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrenk LP (1969) Aiding the decision making—a decision process model. Ergonomics 12:543–557

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith GF (1989) Defining managerial problems: a framework for prescriptive theorizing. Manage Sci 35(8):963–981

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorkin RD (1988) Why are people turning off our alarms? J Acoust Soc Am 84:1107–1108

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorkin RD, Kantowitz BH, Kantowitz SC (1998) Likelihood alarm displays. Hum Factors 30:445–459

    Google Scholar 

  • Watts-Perotti J, Woods DD (1997) A cognitive analysis of anomaly response in space shuttle mission control (Report CSEL 97-TR-02C). The Ohio State University, Columbus

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick K (1995) Sensemaking in organizations. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertheimer M (ed) (1959) Productive thinking. Harper and Row

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods DD (1994) Cognitive demands and activities in dynamic fault management: abduction and disturbance management. In: Stanton N (ed) Human factors of alarm design. Taylor and Francis, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods DD (1995) The alarm problem and directed attention in dynamic fault management. Ergonomics 38(11):2371–2393

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods DD, O’Brien J, Hanes LF (1987) Human factors challenges in process control: the case of nuclear power plants. In: Salvendy G (ed) Handbook of human factors/ergonomics. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods DD, Patterson ES, Roth EM (2002) Can we ever escape from data overload? A cognitive systems diagnosis. Cogn Technol Work 4(1):22–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiao Y (1994) Interacting with complex work environment: a field study and a planning model. PhD thesis, University of Toronto

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Marvin Thordsen, Rob Hutton, and Patty McDermott for conducting the interviews with wildland firefighters and laparoscopic surgeons, and reviewing the transcripts of taped interviews with surgeons. We would also like to thank Robert Hoffman and several anonymous reviewers for making many helpful suggestions. Erik Hollnagel challenged our formulation and helped us clarify our ideas. We also appreciate the support and encouragement we have received from Fumiya Tanabe. This project was funded by several agreements with Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gary Klein.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Klein, G., Pliske, R., Crandall, B. et al. Problem detection. Cogn Tech Work 7, 14–28 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-004-0166-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-004-0166-y

Keywords

Navigation