Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparative effects of photobiomodulation therapy at wavelengths of 660 and 808 nm on regeneration of inferior alveolar nerve in rats following crush injury

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Lasers in Medical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to investigate the therapeutic effects of 660-nm and 880-nm photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT) following inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) crush injury. Following the nerve crush injuries of IAN, 36 Wistar rats were randomly divided into three groups as follows: (1) control, (2) 660-nm PBMT, and (3) 808-nm PBMT (GaAlAs laser, 100 J/cm2, 70 mW, 0.028-cm2 beam). PBMT was started immediately after surgery and performed once every 3 days during the postoperative period. At the end of the 30-day treatment period, histopathological and histomorphometric evaluations of tissue sections were made under a light and electron microscope. The ratio of the inner axonal diameter to the total outer axonal diameter (g-ratio) and the number of axons per square micrometer were evaluated. In the 808-nm PBMT group, the number of nerve fibers with suboptimal g-ratio ranges of 0–0.49 (p < 0.001) is significantly lower than expected, which indicates better rate of myelinization in the 808-nm PBMT group. The number of axons per square micrometer was significantly higher in the 808-nm PBMT group when compared with the control (p < 0.001) and 660-nm PBMT group (p = 0.010). The data and the histopathological investigations suggest that the PBMT with the 808-nm wavelength along with its settings was able to enhance IAN regeneration after nerve crush injury.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bataineh AB (2001) Sensory nerve impairment following mandibular third molar surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 59:1012–1017

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ellies LG, Hawker PB (1993) The prevalence of altered sensation associated with implant surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 8:674–679

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Grötz KA, Al-Nawas B, de Aguiar EG et al (1998) Treatment of injuries to the inferior alveolar nerve after endodontic procedures. Clin Oral Investig 2:73–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Haas DA (2006) Articaine and paresthesia: epidemiological studies. J Am Coll Dent 73:5–10

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. McLeod NMH, Bowe DC (2016) Nerve injury associated with orthognathic surgery. Part 2: inferior alveolar nerve. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 54:366–371

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Tay ABG, Bin LJ, Lye KW et al (2015) Inferior alveolar nerve injury in trauma-induced mandible fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 73:1328–1340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sumer M, Bas B, Yıldız L (2007) Inferior alveolar nerve paresthesia caused by a dentigerous cyst associated with three teeth. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 12:E388–E390

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Schultze-Mosgau S, Reich RH (1993) Assessment of inferior alveolar and lingual nerve disturbances after dentoalveolar surgery, and of recovery of sensitivity. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 22:214–217

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Long H, Zhou Y, Liao L et al (2012) Coronectomy vs. total removal for third molar extraction: a systematic review. J Dent Res 91:659–665

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Leung YY, Fung PP-L, Cheung LK (2012) Treatment modalities of neurosensory deficit after lower third molar surgery: a systematic review. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 70:768–778

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Alhassani AA, AlGhamdi AST (2010) Inferior alveolar nerve injury in implant dentistry: diagnosis, causes, prevention, and management. J Oral Implantol 36:401–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Angeletti P, Pereira MD, Gomes HC et al (2010) Effect of low-level laser therapy (GaAlAs) on bone regeneration in midpalatal anterior suture after surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 109:e38–e46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang X, Tian F, Reddy DD et al (2017) Up-regulation of cerebral cytochrome-c-oxidase and hemodynamics by transcranial infrared laser stimulation: a broadband near-infrared spectroscopy study. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 37:3789–3802

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Rojas JC, Gonzalez-Lima F (2013) Neurological and psychological applications of transcranial lasers and LEDs. Biochem Pharmacol 86:447–457

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. de Rosso MPO, Buchaim DV, Kawano N et al (2018) Photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT) in peripheral nerve regeneration: a systematic review. Bioengineering 5:44–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hashmi JT, Huang Y-Y, Osmani BZ et al (2010) Role of low-level laser therapy in neurorehabilitation. PM R 2:S292–S305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Coulthard P, Kushnerev E, Jm Y et al (2014) Interventions for iatrogenic inferior alveolar and lingual nerve injury. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 16:CD005293

    Google Scholar 

  18. Naftel JP, Richards LP, Pan M, Bernanke JM (1999) Course and composition of the nerves that supply the mandibular teeth of the rat. Anat Rec 256:433–447

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Germanà G, Muglia U, Santoro M et al (1992) Morphometric analysis of sciatic nerve and its main branches in the rabbit. Biol Struct Morphog 4:11–15

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Peng Q, Juzeniene A, Chen J et al (2008) Lasers in medicine. Rep Prog Phys 71:1–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Rochkind S, Leider-Trejo L, Nissan M et al (2007) Efficacy of 780-nm laser phototherapy on peripheral nerve regeneration after neurotube reconstruction procedure (double-blind randomized study). Photomed Laser Surg 25:137–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Andreo L, Soldera CB, Ribeiro BG et al (2017) Effects of photobiomodulation on experimental models of peripheral nerve injury. Lasers Med Sci 32:2155–2165

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Gasperini G, De Siqueira ICR, Costa LR (2014) Lower-level laser therapy improves neurosensory disorders resulting from bilateral mandibular sagittal split osteotomy: a randomized crossover clinical trial. J Cranio-Maxillofacial Surg 42:e130–e133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Guarini D, Gracia B, Ramírez-Lobos V et al (2018) Laser biophotomodulation in patients with neurosensory disturbance of the inferior alveolar nerve after sagittal split ramus osteotomy: a 2-year follow-up study. Photomed Laser Surg 36:3–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Alghamdi KM, Kumar A (2012) Low-level laser therapy : a useful technique for enhancing the proliferation of various cultured cells. Lasers Med Sci 27:237–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Barez MM, Tajziehchi M, Heidari MH et al (2017) Stimulation effect of low level laser therapy on sciatic nerve regeneration in rat. J Lasers Med Sci 8:S32–S37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wang CZ, Chen YJ, Wang YH et al (2014) Low-level laser irradiation improves functional recovery and nerve regeneration in sciatic nerve crush rat injury model. PLoS One 9:e103348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Takhtfooladi MA, Jahanbakhsh F, Takhtfooladi HA et al (2015) Effect of low-level laser therapy (685 nm, 3 J/cm2) on functional recovery of the sciatic nerve in rats following crushing lesion. Lasers Med Sci 30:1047–1052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Takhtfooladi MA, Sharifi D (2015) A comparative study of red and blue light-emitting diodes and low-level laser in regeneration of the transected sciatic nerve after an end to end neurorrhaphy in rabbits. Lasers Med Sci 30:2319–2324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Medalha CC, Di Gangi GC, Barbosa CB et al (2012) Low-level laser therapy improves repair following complete resection of the sciatic nerve in rats. Lasers Med Sci 27:629–635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Barbosa RI, Marcolino AM, De Jesus Guirro RR et al (2010) Comparative effects of wavelengths of low-power laser in regeneration of sciatic nerve in rats following crushing lesion. Lasers Med Sci 25:423–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. de Martins DO, dos Santos FM, de Oliveira ME et al (2013) Laser therapy and pain-related behavior after injury of the inferior alveolar nerve: possible involvement of neurotrophins. J Neurotrauma 30:480–486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. de Martins DO, dos Santos FM, Ciena AP et al (2017) Neuropeptide expression and morphometric differences in crushed alveolar inferior nerve of rats: effects of photobiomodulation. Lasers Med Sci 32:833–840

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Souza-Barros L, Dhaidan G, Maunula M et al (2018) Skin color and tissue thickness effects on transmittance, reflectance, and skin temperature when using 635 and 808 nm lasers in low intensity therapeutics. Lasers Surg Med 50:291–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Nasouri B, Murphy TE, Berberoglu H (2014) Simulation of laser propagation through a three-layer human skin model in the spectral range from 1000 to 1900 nm. J Biomed Opt 19:075003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Miloro M, Criddle TR (2018) Does low-level laser therapy affect recovery of lingual and inferior alveolar nerve injuries? J Oral Maxillofac Surg 76:2669–2675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Miloro M, Halkias LE, Mallery S et al (2002) Low-level laser effect on neural regeneration in Gore-Tex tubes. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 93:27–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Angius D, Wang H, Spinner RJ et al (2012) A systematic review of animal models used to study nerve regeneration in tissue-engineered scaffolds. Biomaterials 33:8034–8039

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Wang X, Reddy DD, Nalawade SS et al (2017) Impact of heat on metabolic and hemodynamic changes in transcranial infrared laser stimulation measured by broadband near-infrared spectroscopy. Neurophotonics 5(1):011004

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research was funded by Baskent University Research Fund (Grand Number D-DA 14/06).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nurettin Diker.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in the present study, involving animals, were approved by the Institutional Review Board and Ethical Committee of Baskent University for experimental research on animals.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Diker, N., Aytac, D., Helvacioglu, F. et al. Comparative effects of photobiomodulation therapy at wavelengths of 660 and 808 nm on regeneration of inferior alveolar nerve in rats following crush injury. Lasers Med Sci 35, 413–420 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-019-02838-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-019-02838-w

Keywords

Navigation