Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison between performance of single-fiber reflectance spectroscopy (SFRS) system and colposcopy: a phase III trial

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Lasers in Medical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Herein, the performance of single-fiber reflectance spectroscopy (SFRS) in detection of cervical pre-cancerous squamous intraepithelial lesions (SIL) was compared with colposcopy. Based on the previous results obtained from 167 samples and finding the contributing parameters in differentiating SILs from non-SILs, a user-friendly interface was developed to detect the SILs using SFRS system. Detection of SILs in 301 patients was performed by both SFRS system and routine colposcopy. In addition to physician-determined sites, four quarters of the cervix were measured by SFRS system and suspicious lesions detected by either method were biopsied. Histopathologic results of the biopsied species were compared to the physician judgments based on colposcopy and the results of SFRS system. SFRS could differentiate between SILs and non-SILs with mean sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of 38.3, 60.9, 15.2, and 84.3%, respectively. These values were obtained as 88.3, 10.6, 15.4, and 83.1% for the colposcopy, respectively. Although sensitivity of SFRS in detection of SILs is about twofold less than the colposcopy, it can reduce the number of unnecessary biopsies by a factor of more than 5.5. Therefore, the aid of SFRS system to the physician can reduce the number of unnecessary biopsies. On the other hand, both colposcopy and SFRS methods equally suffer from low detection worth in terms of positive/negative predictive values. In conclusion, using the online, simple and non-invasive SFRS system to choose between several suspicious sites in a patient in the clinic may be recommended.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cervical Cancer Estimated incidence, mortality and prevalence worldwide in 2012. [cited 2016 23 July]; Available from: http://globocan.iarc.fr/old/FactSheets/cancers/cervix-new.asp

  2. Guido R, Schiffman M, Solomon D, Burke L (2003) Postcolposcopy management strategies for women referred with low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions or human papillomavirus DNA-positive atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance: a two-year prospective study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 188(6):1401–1405

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hariri Tabrizi S, Aghamiri SMR, Farzaneh F, Sterenborg HJCM (2014) The use of optical spectroscopy for in vivo detection of cervical pre-cancer. Lasers Med Sci 29(2):831–845

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hariri Tabrizi S, Aghamiri SMR, Farzaneh F, Amelink A, Sterenborg HJCM (2013) Single fiber reflectance spectroscopy on cervical premalignancies: the potential for reduction of the number of unnecessary biopsies. J Biomed Opt 18(1):017002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Canpolat M, Mourant JR (2001) Particle size analysis of turbid media with a single optical fiber in contact with the medium to deliver and detect white light. Appl Opt 40(22):3792–3799

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hariri Tabrizi S, Farzaneh F, Aghamiri SMR (2014) Applicability of optical reflectance spectroscopy for detection of precancerous lesions in uterine cervix in vivo. Arch Iran Med 17(9):602–607

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hariri Tabrizi S, Shakibaei AA (2016) The effect of probe pressure on in vivo single fiber reflectance spectroscopy. J Lasers Med Sci 7(4):233–237

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Marquardt D (1963) An algorithm for least-squares estimation of nonlinear parameters. SIAM J Appl Math 11(2):431–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kanick SC, Robinson DJ, Sterenborg HJCM, Amelink A (2009) Monte Carlo analysis of single fiber reflectance spectroscopy: photon path length and sampling depth. Phys Med Biol 54(22):6991–7008

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kanick S, Gamm U, Schouten M, Sterenborg H, Robinson D, Amelink A (2011) Measurement of the reduced scattering coefficient of turbid media using single fiber reflectance spectroscopy: fiber diameter and phase function dependence. Biomed Opt Express 2(1):1687–1702

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Mitchell M, Schottenfeld D, Tortolero-Luna G, Cantor S, Richards-Kortum R (1998) Colposcopy for the diagnosis of squamous intraepithelial lesions: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 91(4):626–631

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Alvarez R, Wright T, Group OD (2007) Effective cervical neoplasia detection with a novel optical detection system: a randomized trial. Gynecol Oncol 104:281–289

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cantor SB, Yamal J-M, Guillaud M et al (2011) Accuracy of optical spectroscopy for the detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: testing a device as an adjunct to colposcopy. Int J Cancer 128:1151–1168

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Louwers J, Zaal A, Kocken M et al (2011) Dynamic spectral imaging colposcopy: higher sensitivity for detection of premalignant cervical lesions. BJOG 118:309–318

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We cordially acknowledge the contribution of the gynecology residents, Dr. Fatehi, Dr. Salimi, Dr. Saraeian, Dr. Ghanbarpour, Dr. Mostafa, Dr. Fereidonjah, Dr. Defaei, Dr. Khosravi, Dr. Asadollahi, and Dr. Ashori. Also, the staff of the gynecology department of Emam Hossein Hospital deserves gratitude. We would also like to thank all the patients who participated in this study. The study was supported by Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences under grant number 13/1630.

Funding

The study was funded by Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences (grant number 13/1630).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Farah Farzaneh.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in this study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hariri Tabrizi, S., Farzaneh, F., Aghamiri, S.M.R. et al. Comparison between performance of single-fiber reflectance spectroscopy (SFRS) system and colposcopy: a phase III trial. Lasers Med Sci 32, 2139–2144 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-017-2353-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-017-2353-0

Keywords

Navigation