Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The application of 120-W high-performance system GreenLight laser vaporization of the prostate in high-risk patients

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Lasers in Medical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of 120-W potassium titanyl phosphate (KTP) laser vaporization in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) who also had cardiopulmonary diseases who were taking long-term anticoagulants and were at high risk of bleeding complications. The prospective study included 188 patients with severe lower urinary tract symptoms who underwent 120-W KTP laser vaporization of the prostate. All patients were at high cardiopulmonary risk, having presented with an American Society of Anesthesiology score of 3 or greater. Of those, 45 patients were taking oral anticoagulants, and 1 had a severe bleeding disorder. BPH was successfully treated with 120-W KTP laser vaporization in all patients. Mean preoperative prostate volume ± SD was 66 ± 23.1 ml, and mean operative time was 50.8 ± 15.5 min. There were no major complications intraoperatively or postoperatively, and no blood transfusions were required. Postoperatively, only 14 patients (7.4 %) required bladder irrigation. Average catheterization time was 1.9 ± 1.5 days (range, 1–5 days). Three patients required reoperation due to enlarged prostates from residual adenoma. At 3-, 6,- 12-, and 24-month follow-ups, mean urinary peak flow increased from 8.0 ± 3.6 ml/s to 19.1 ± 5.6, 19.2 ± 4.7, 19.1 ± 4.65, and 19.2 ± 4.34 ml/s, respectively. Mean International Prostate Symptom Scores decreased over time, from 25.6 ± 5.1 (3 months) to 9.4 ± 2.8, 7.05 ± 1.46, 6.24 ± 1.36, and 6.20 ± 1.32 (24 months), respectively. 120-W HPS KTP laser vaporization is a safe and effective treatment option in BPH patients at high risk and those on anticoagulation therapy who have severe LUTS secondary to BPH.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Berry SJ, Coffey DS, Walsh PC, Ewing LL (1984) The development of human benign prostatic hyperplasia with age. J Urol 132:474–479

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Souverein PC, Erkens JA, de la Rosette JJMCH, Leufkens HGM, Herings RMC (2003) Drug treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia and hospital admission for BPH-related surgery. Eur Urol 43:528–534

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Amen-Plama JA, Arteaga RB (2001) Hemostatic technique: extracapsular prostatic adenomectomy. J Urol 166:1364–1367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Mebust WK et al (1998) Transurethral surgery. In: Walsh PC, Retik AB, Vaughan ED Jr (eds) Cambells’ Urology, 7th edn. WB Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 1511–1528

    Google Scholar 

  5. Reich O, Bachmann A, Siebels M, Hofstetter A, Stief CG, Sulser T (2005) High power (80 W) potassium-titanyl-phosphate laser vaporization of the prostate in 66 high risk patients. J Urol 173:158–160

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. AUA Practice Guidelines Committee (2003) AUA guideline on management of benign prostatic hyperplasia: diagnosis and treatment recommendations. J Urol 170:530–547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cleynenbreuel BV, Srirangam SJ, Van Poppel H (2009) High performance system Greenlight laser: indications and outcomes. Curr Opin Urol 19:33–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Costello AJ, Bowsher WG, Bolton DM, Braslis KG, Burt J (1992) Laser ablation of the prostate in patients with benign prostatic hypertrophy. Br J Urol 69:603–608

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Muschter R, Hofstetter A (1995) Interstitial laser therapy outcomes in benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Endourol 9:129–135

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Malek RS (2008) GreenLight™ HPS laser therapy for BPH: clinical outcomes and surgical recommendations from the International GreenLight User (IGLU) group. Eur Urol Suppl 7:361–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bachmann A, Schurch L, Ruszat R et al (2005) Photoselective vaporization (PVP) versus transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP): a prospective bi-centre study of perioperative morbidity and early functional outcome. Eur Urol 48:965–972

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bachmann A, Ruszat R, Wyler S et al (2005) Photoselective vaporization of the prostate: the Basel experience after 108 procedures. Eur Urol 47:798–804

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Tugcu V, Tascı AI, Sahin S, Ordekci Y, Karakas OF, Zorluoglu F (2007) Outcomes of 80 W KTP laser vaporization of the large prostate. Urol Int 79:316–320

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Volkan T, Ihsan TA, Yılmaz O et al (2005) Short term outcomes of high power (80-W) potassium-titanyl-phosphate laser vaporization of the prostate. Eur Urol 48:608–613

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Tugcu V, Tascı AI, Sahin S, Zorluoglu F (2008) Rapid communication: photoselective vaporization of the prostate verus transurethral resection of the prostate for the large prostate: a prospective nonrandomised bicenter trial with 2-year follow-up. J Endourol 22:347–353

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sountoulides P, Tsakiris P (2008) The evolution of KTP laser vaporization of the prostate. Yonsei Med J 49:189–199

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Tzortzis V, Gravas S, de la Rosette-Jean JMCH (2009) Minimally invasive surgical treatments for benign prostatic hyperplasia. Eur Urol Suppl 8:513–522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Tasçı AL, Ilbey YÖ, Luleci H et al (2011) 120-W Greenlight laser photoselective vaporization of prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia: midterm outcomes. Urology 78:134–141

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Al-Ansari A, Younes N, Sampige VP et al (2010) Greenlight HPS 120-W laser vaporization versus transurethral resection of the prostate for treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: a randomized clinical trial with midterm follow-up. Eur Urol 58:349–355

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Capitan C, Blazquez C, Martin MD, Hernandez V, de la Pena E, Llorente C (2011) GreenLight HPS 120-W laser vaporization versus transurethral resection of the prostate for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia: a randomized clinical trial with 2-year follow-up. Eur Urol 60:734–739

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Spaliviero M, Araki M, Wong C (2008) Short-term outcomes of Greenlight HPSTM laser photoselective vaporization of prostatectomy (PVP) for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). J Endourol 22:2341–2347

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Saklad M (1941) Grading of patients for surgical procedures. Anesthesiology 2:281–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Malek RS, Barrett DM, Kuntzman RS (1998) High-power potassium-titanyl-phosphate (KTP/532) laser vaporization prostatectomy: 24 hours later. Urology 51:254–256

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Malek RS, Kuntzman RS, Barrett DM (2000) High power potassium-titanyl-phosphate laser vaporization prostatectomy. J Urol 163:1730–1733

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Hai MA, Malek RS (2003) Photoselective vaporization of the prostate: initial experience with a new 80 W KTP laser for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Endourol 17:93–96

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Malek RS, Nahen K (2004) Photoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP): KTP laser therapy of obstructive benign prostatic hyperplasia. AUA Update 23:153–155

    Google Scholar 

  27. Te AE, Malloy TR, Stein BS et al (2004) Photoselective vaporization of the prostate for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: 12-month results from the First United States Multicenter Prospective Trial. J Urol 172:1404–1408

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Bachmann A, Schürch L, Ruszat R, Wyler SF (2005) Photoselective vaporization (PVP) versus transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP): a prospective bi-centre study of perioperative morbidity and early functional outcome. Eur Urol 48:965–972

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Malek RS, Kuntzman RS, Barrett DM (2005) Photoselective potassiumtitanyl-phosphate laser vaporization of the benign obstructive prostate: observations on long-term outcomes. J Urol 174:1344–1348

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Te AE, Malloy TR, Stein BS, Ulchaker JC, Nseyo UO, Hai MA (2006) Impact of prostate-specific antigen level and prostate volume as predictors of efficacy in photoselective vaporization prostatectomy: analysis and results of an ongoing prospective multicentre study at 3 years. BJU Int 97:1229–1233

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Roehrborn CG (2006) Safety and efficacy of the potassium-titanyl-phosphate laser and photoselective vaporization of the prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia. Rev Urol 8:S16–S23

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Woo H, Reich O, Bachmann A et al (2008) Outcomes of GreenLight HPS 120-W laser therapy in specific patients populations: those in retention, on anticoagulants, and with large prostates (>80 mL). Eur Urol Suppl 7:378–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Tugcu V, Tasci AI, Sahin S, Zorluoglu F (2008) Comparison of photoselective vaporization of the prostate and transurethral resection of the prostate: a prospective nonrandomized bicenter trial with 2-year follow-up. J Endourol 22:1519–1525

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Ruszat R, Seitz M, Wyler SF et al (2008) Greenlight laser vaporization of the prostate: single-center experience and long-term results after 500 procedures. Eur Urol 54:893–901

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Ruszat R, Wyler SF, Seitz M et al (2008) Comparison of potassium-titanyl-phosphate laser vaporization of the prostate and transurethral resection of the prostate: update of a prospective non-randomized two-center study. BJU Int 102:1432–1439

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Huang ST, Cai X, Ii X et al (2008) Greenlight photoselective vaporization of prostate for treatment of high-risk older patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (report of 30 cases). Clini Med 28:25–26

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Te AE (2006) The next generation in laser treatments and the role of the GreenLight high-performance system laser. Rev Urol 8:S24–S30

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Ruszat R, Wyler S, Forster T et al (2007) Safety and effectiveness of photoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP) in patients on ongoing oral anticoagulation. Eur Urol 51:1031–1041

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Dotan ZA, Mor Y, Leibovitch I et al (2003) The efficacy and safety of perioperative low molecular weight heparin substitution in patients on chronic oral anticoagulant therapy undergoing transurethral prostatectomy for bladder outlet obstruction. J Urol 168:610–614

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Ms. Karen Klein (Research Support Core, Wake Forest School of Medicine) for her editorial assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wei Tao.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tao, W., Xue, B., Zang, Y. et al. The application of 120-W high-performance system GreenLight laser vaporization of the prostate in high-risk patients. Lasers Med Sci 28, 1151–1157 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-012-1212-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-012-1212-2

Keywords

Navigation