Abstract.
I investigate the effects of differences in market context and governance arrangements on undergraduate education and separately budgeted research at both public and private universities. Public universities faced with little competition and universities that rely heavily on government subsidies relative to tuition tend to have larger undergraduate enrollments, fewer small classes, lower graduation rates, and are more likely to engage in separately budgeted research than universities with the opposite characteristics. In addition, Catholic universities offer fewer small classes but have higher graduation rates than independent private universities, while other church-affiliated universities spend less on separately budgeted research.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Submitted: 23 July 2001, Accepted: 29 July 2002,
JEL Classification:
I22, I28, L30
Earlier versions of this paper were presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL, April 22, 2001, and the research conference on “It’s Better to Rely on Well-designed Institutions than on Well-behaved People,” at the University of California, Los Angeles, May 18-19, 2001. I thank Dennis Coates, David Epstein, Susanne Lohmann, Robert Pahre, and Matthew Potoski for helpful comments.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lowry, R.C. Markets, governance, and university priorities: Evidence on undergraduate education and research. Economics of Governance 5, 29–51 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10101-002-0056-9
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10101-002-0056-9