Skip to main content
Log in

The importance of systems thinking in ethical and sustainable decision-making

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Central European Journal of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ethical values beyond the satisfaction of basic human needs are specific to each society at a given time. Modern societies are confronted to the challenges of disappearing natural resources, fierce competition on global markets, and climate change. In this paper we define ‘good’, and at the same time ‘ethical‘ decisions in the 21st century as being in accordance with the principles of Sustainable Development. Operations Research can assist sustainable decision-making in two ways: (1) through the tools of systems thinking, in particular system dynamics and soft system modelling, to provide insight into the way complex non-linear living systems and human societies function, and help making sustainable decisions, and (2) through educating and training young people in systems thinking. The paper presents examples of simple models that could serve in classrooms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ackoff R (1974) The social responsibility of operational research. Oper Res Q 25:361–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Apel KO (1990) Is the ethics of the ideal communication community a Utopia? On the relationship between ethics, Utopia, and the critique of Utopia. In: Benhabib S, Dallmayr F (eds) The communicative ethics controversy. MIT Press, Cambridge

  • Brans JP, Macharis C, Kunsch PL, Chevalier A, Schwaninger M (1998) Combining multicriteria decision aid and system dynamics for the control of socioeconomic processes. An iterative real-time procedure. Eur J Oper Res 109:428–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brans JP (2004) The management of the future. Ethics in OR: respect, multicriteria analysis, happiness. Eur J Oper Res 153(2):466–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brans JP, Gallo G (2004) Ethics in OR/MS: Past, present and future. 4OR 2:95–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Checkland P (1993) Systems thinking, systems practice. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Coyle RG (1996) System dynamics modelling. A practical approach. Chapman and Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • de Waal F (2005) Our inner ape. Riverhead Books, New York

  • Diamond J (2005) Collapse. How societies choose to fail or to survive. Penguin books, London

  • Dörner D (2004) Die Logik des Misslingens. Strategisches Denken in komplexen Situationen. (The logic of failure—strategic thinking in complex situations). Rowohlt Taschenbuch Verlag, Reinbek bei Hamburg, Germany

  • Ferry L (1995) The new ecological order, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, originally published as: Le nouvel ordre écologique. L’arbre, l’animal et l’homme, Grasset, Paris

  • Forrester JW (1969) Urban dynamics. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Girard R (1977) The violence and the sacred. Johns Hopkins University Press Girard, R. originally published as: La Violence et le Sacré, Grasset, Paris, 1972

  • Habermas J (1990) Discourse ethics: notes on a program of philosophical justification. In: Benhabib S, Dallmayr F (eds) The communicative ethics controversy. MIT Press, Cambridge

  • Haines SG (2000) Systems thinking and learning. HRD Press, Amherst

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardin G (1968) The tragedy of the commons. Science 16:1243–1248

    Google Scholar 

  • Horner P (2002) History in the making, OR/MS today, pp 30–39,

  • Hosler D, Sabloff JA, Runge D (1977) Simulation model development: a case study of classic Maya collapse. In: Hammond N (eds.) Social process in Maya prehistory. Academic, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson M (1982) The nature of soft systems thinking: the work of Churchman, Ackoff, and Checkland. J Appl Syst Anal 9:17–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson M (1985) Social systems theory and practice: the need for a critical approach. Int J Gen Syst 10:135–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson M (1991) The origins and nature of critical systems thinking. Syst Practice 4:131–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim DH (1992) Systems archetypes, diagnosing systemic issues and designing high-leverage interventions, toolbox reprint series: system archetypes. Pegasus Communications, Cambridge

  • Kunsch PL (2005) Limits to success. The iron law of Verhulst. In: Ausloos M, Dierickx M (eds.), The Logistic Map and the Route to Chaos, Springer Verlag, pp 29–51

  • Meadows DH, Meadows DL, Randers J, Behrens III WW (1972) The limits to growth. Universe Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mingers J (1980) Towards an appropriate social theory for applied systems thinking: critical theory and soft systems methodology. J Appl Syst Anal 7:41–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Mingers J (1984) Subjectivism and soft systems methodology—a critique. J Appl Syst Anal 11:85–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Mingers J (1997) Towards critical pluralism. In: Mingers J, Gill A (eds) Multimethodology: theory and practice of combining management science methodologies. Wiley, Chichester, pp 407–440

    Google Scholar 

  • Mingers J (2000) What is it to be critical? Teaching a critical approach to management undergraduates. Management Learning 31:219–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearce DW, Turner RK (1990) Economics of natural resources and the Environment. Harvester Wheatsheaf, Hemel Hempstead

  • Rauschmayer F (2001) How to consider ethics in MCA? In: Colorni A, Parrucini M, Roy B (eds) A-MCD-A, European Commission, JRC, EUR-report 19808 EN, pp 273–279

  • Richardson GP (ed) (1996) Modelling for management, vol I. Dartmouth Publishing Company, Hants

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson LF (1993) The collected papers of Lewis Fry Richardson, vol 2. Quantitative psychology and studies of conflict. In: Sutherland I (ed) Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge, Cambridge

  • Roberts N, Andersen D, Deal R, Garet M, Shaffer W (1994) Modeling the ecology of the Kaibab plateau. In: Introduction to computer modeling, chap 18. Productivity Press, Portland

  • Rosenhead J (1989) Operational research at the crossroads: Cecil Gordon and the development of post-war OR”. J Oper Res Soc 40:3–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schweitzer A (1996) Kultur und Ethik, reprint of an original work published in 1923, Verlag C.H. Beck, München

  • Senge PM (1990) The fifth discipline. The art and practice of the learning organization. Doubleday & Co., New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterman JD (2000) Business dynamics, systems thinking and modeling for a complex world. McGraw-Hill, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson GG (1991) Common property economics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • VENSIM (1998–2003) Professional32 Version 5.4.a. The Ventana simulation environment. Ventana Systems, Inc.©

  • Vinolo S (2005) Du Mimetismeà l’homonisation “La violence différante”. L’Harmattan, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace WA (1994) Ethics in modeling. Pergamon, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED). Our common future. Oxford University Press, Oxford, p 43 (1987)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. L. Kunsch.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kunsch, P.L., Theys, M. & Brans, J.P. The importance of systems thinking in ethical and sustainable decision-making. cent.eur.j.oper.res. 15, 253–269 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10100-007-0029-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10100-007-0029-8

Keywords

Navigation