Skip to main content
Log in

Adsorption capacities of poorly crystalline Fe minerals for antimonate and arsenate removal from water: adsorption properties and effects of environmental and chemical conditions

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Antimonate (Sb(V)) and arsenate (As(V)) pollution frequently occur in aqueous environment and can be absorbed by poorly crystalline Fe minerals (i.e., ferrihydrite). In this study, the adsorption capacity and rate of Sb(V) and As(V) from water with fresh ferrihydrite were compared by establishing adsorption isotherms and kinetics, and the effects of ferrihydrite dosage, solution pH and humic substances on Sb(V) and As(V) adsorption were also investigated. The adsorption isotherms results showed that the equilibrium and maximum adsorption capacities of Sb(V) on ferrihydrite were approximately equal to those of As(V) under different temperatures. The results of adsorption kinetics showed that the adsorption rate of Sb(V) derived from the pseudo-second-order equation was much lower than that of As(V). In addition, the adsorption capacity and rate of Sb(V) and As(V) were greatly affected by various ferrihydrite dosage and solution pHs. The presence of humic acid and fulvic acid (FA) significantly affected the adsorption process of Sb(V) due to competition adsorption, whereas the adsorption properties of As(V) were little affected by FA under this experimental conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Dousova B, Buzek F, Herzogova L, Machovic V, Lhotka M (2015) Effect of organic matter on arsenic (V) and antimony (V) adsorption in soils. Eur J oil Sci 66:74–82

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fan J-X, Wang Y-J, Cui X-D, Zhou D-M (2013) Sorption isotherms and kinetics of Sb (V) on several Chinese soils with different physicochemical properties. J Soils Sediments 13:344–353

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson JF, Gavis J (1972) A review of the arsenic cycle in natural waters. Water Res 6:1259–1274

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Filella M, Belzile N, Chen Y-W (2002) Antimony in the environment: a review focused on natural waters: II Relevant solution chemistry. Earth Sci Rev 59:265–285

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Freundlich U (1906) Die adsorption in lusungen. J Phys Chem 57:385–470

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fu Z, Wu F, Mo C, Deng Q, Meng W, Giesy JP (2016) Comparison of arsenic and antimony biogeochemical behavior in water, soil and tailings from Xikuangshan China. Sci Total Environ 539:97–104

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grosvenor A, Kobe B, Biesinger M, McIntyre N (2004) Investigation of multiplet splitting of Fe 2p XPS spectra and bonding in iron compounds. Surf Interface Anal 36:1564–1574

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Guo X, Wu Z, He M, Meng X, Jin X, Qiu N, Zhang J (2014) Adsorption of antimony onto iron oxyhydroxides: adsorption behavior and surface structure. J Hazard Mater 276:339–345

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hammel W, Debus R, Steubing L (2000) Mobility of antimony in soil and its availability to plants. Chemosphere 41:1791–1798

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hasan Z, Jhung SH (2015) Removal of hazardous organics from water using metal-organic frameworks (MOFs): Plausible mechanisms for selective adsorptions. J Hazard Mater 283:329–339

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes KF, Papelis C, Leckie JO (1988) Modeling ionic strength effects on anion adsorption at hydrous oxide/solution interfaces. J Colloid Interface Sci 125:564–572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He M (2007) Distribution and phytoavailability of antimony at an antimony mining and smelting area, Hunan China. Environ Geochem Health 29:209–219

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • He M, Wang X, Wu F, Fu Z (2012) Antimony pollution in China. Sci Total Environ 421:41–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iervolino G, Vaiano V, Rizzo L, Sarno G, Farina A, Sannino D (2014) Removal of arsenic from drinking water by photo-catalytic oxidation on MoOx/TiO2 and adsorption on γ-Al2O3. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 91:88–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jia Y, Xu L, Wang X, Demopoulos GP (2007) Infrared spectroscopic and X-ray diffraction characterization of the nature of adsorbed arsenate on ferrihydrite. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 71:1643–1654

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Karimian N, Johnston SG, Burton ED (2017) Antimony and arsenic behavior during Fe(II)-induced transformation of jarosite. Environ Sci Technol 51:4259–4268

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ko I, Davis AP, Kim J-Y, Kim K-W (2007) Effect of contact order on the adsorption of inorganic arsenic species onto hematite in the presence of humic acid. J Hazard Mater 141:53–60

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lan B, Wang Y, Wang X, Zhou X, Kang Y, Li L (2016) Aqueous arsenic (As) and antimony (Sb) removal by potassium ferrate. Chem Eng J 292:389–397

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Langmuir I (1917) The constitution and fundamental properties of solids and liquids. J Frankl Inst 183:102–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee CG, Alvarez PJJ, Nam A, Park SJ, Do T, Choi US, Lee SH (2017) Arsenic(V) removal using an amine-doped acrylic ion exchange fiber: kinetic, equilibrium, and regeneration studies. J Hazard Mater 325:223–229

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Leuz A-K, Mönch H, Johnson CA (2006) Sorption of Sb (III) and Sb (V) to goethite: influence on Sb (III) oxidation and mobilization. Environ Sci Technol 40:7277–7282

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu R, Xu W, He Z, Lan H, Liu H, Qu J, Prasai T (2015) Adsorption of antimony(V) onto Mn(II)-enriched surfaces of manganese-oxide and FeMn binary oxide. Chemosphere 138:616–624

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Masscheleyn PH, Delaune RD, Patrick WH Jr (1991) Effect of redox potential and pH on arsenic speciation and solubility in a contaminated soil. Environ Sci Technol 25:1414–1419

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mitsunobu S, Harada T, Takahashi Y (2006) Comparison of antimony behavior with that of arsenic under various soil redox conditions. Environ Sci Technol 40:7270–7276

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mitsunobu S, Takahashi Y, Terada Y, Sakata M (2010) Antimony (V) incorporation into synthetic ferrihydrite, goethite, and natural iron oxyhydroxides. Environ Sci Technol 44:3712–3718

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Muller T, Craw D, McQuillan AJ (2015) Arsenate and antimonate adsorption competition on 6-line ferrihydrite monitored by infrared spectroscopy. Appl Geochem 61:224–232

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oremland RS, Stolz JF (2003) The ecology of arsenic. Science 300:939–944

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pauling L (1933) The formulas of antimonic acid and the antimonates. J Am Chem Soc 55:1895–1900

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pierce ML, Moore CB (1982) Adsorption of arsenite and arsenate on amorphous iron hydroxide. Water Res 16:1247–1253

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Qi P, Pichler T (2017) Competitive adsorption of As(III), As(V), Sb(III) and Sb(V) onto ferrihydrite in multi-component systems: implications for mobility and distribution. J Hazard Mater 330:142–148

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rakshit S, Sarkar D, Punamiya P, Datta R (2011) Antimony sorption at gibbsite–water interface. Chemosphere 84:480–483

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Raven KP (1998) Jain, Amita., Loeppert, R.H., Arsenite and arsenate adsorption on ferrihydrite: kinetics, equilibrium, and adsorption envelopes. Environ Sci Technol 32:344–349

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Russell JD (1979) Infrared spectroscopy of ferrihydrite: evidence for the presence of structural hydroxyl-groups. Clay Miner 14(2):109–114

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schwertmann Ut, Fischer W (1973) Natural “amorphous” ferric hydroxide. Geoderma 10:237–247

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • van Genuchten CM, Peña J (2016) Antimonate and arsenate speciation on reactive soil minerals studied by differential pair distribution function analysis. Chem Geol 429:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang X, He M, Xi J, Lu X (2011) Antimony distribution and mobility in rivers around the world’s largest antimony mine of Xikuangshan, Hunan Province China. Microchem J 97:4–11

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang H, Chen F, Mu S, Zhang D, Pan X, Lee D-J, Chang J-S (2013) Removal of antimony (Sb(V)) from Sb mine drainage: biological sulfate reduction and sulfide oxidation–precipitation. Bioresour Technol 146:799–802

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang H, Zhang D, Mou S, Song W, Al-Misned FA, Mortuza MG, Pan X (2015) Simultaneous removal of tetracycline hydrochloride and As (III) using poorly-crystalline manganese dioxide. Chemosphere 136:102–110

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang H, Wang YN, Sun Y, Pan X, Zhang D, Tsang YF (2018) Differences in Sb (V) and As (V) adsorption onto a poorly crystalline phyllomanganate (δ-MnO2): adsorption kinetics, isotherms, and mechanisms. Process Saf Environ Prot 113:40–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weng L, Van Riemsdijk WH, Hiemstra T (2009) Effects of fulvic and humic acids on arsenate adsorption to goethite: experiments and modeling. Environ Sci Technol 43:7198–7204

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson N, Craw D, Hunter K (2004) Antimony distribution and environmental mobility at an historic antimony smelter site New Zealand. Environ Pollut 129:257–266

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson SC, Lockwood PV, Ashley PM, Tighe M (2010) The chemistry and behaviour of antimony in the soil environment with comparisons to arsenic: a critical review. Environ Pollut 158:1169–1181

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wu F, Fu Z, Liu B, Mo C, Chen B, Corns W, Liao H (2011) Health risk associated with dietary co-exposure to high levels of antimony and arsenic in the world’s largest antimony mine area. Sci Total Environm 409:3344–3351

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xi J, He M, Lin C (2010) Adsorption of antimony (V) on kaolinite as a function of pH, ionic strength and humic acid. Environ Earth Sci 60:715–722

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was financially supported by the China CPSF-CAS Joint Foundation for Excellent Postdoctoral Fellows (No. 2016LH0048), the Shandong Province Natural Science Foundation (No. ZR2016DQ08), the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation funded project (No. 2016M600829), the Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong SAR, China (No. 18202116), and the Dean’s Strategic Research Area Fund (No. DSRAF-6 SP1, DRF/SFRS-8), and the Internal Research Grant (No. RG 78/2015-2016R, RG 50/2017-2018R, RG 34/2017-2018R) of The Education University of Hong Kong.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yiu Fai Tsang or Xiangliang Pan.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 404 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, H., Tsang, Y.F., Wang, Yn. et al. Adsorption capacities of poorly crystalline Fe minerals for antimonate and arsenate removal from water: adsorption properties and effects of environmental and chemical conditions. Clean Techn Environ Policy 20, 2169–2179 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-018-1552-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-018-1552-0

Keywords

Navigation