Skip to main content
Log in

Abatement technology investment and emissions trading system: a case of coal-fired power industry of Shenzhen, China

  • Brief Report
  • Published:
Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As one of China’s emissions trading system (ETS) pilots, Shenzhen established the first carbon market of China in 2013. With field data collection and benefit-cost analysis, this article assesses the abatement technology investment decisions of Shenzhen coal-fired power industry under different carbon price scenarios. The results indicate that Shenzhen ETS constitutes a main driver for the short-term technology investment of the industry, but the long-term stimulation effect appears quite limited, except for the integrated gasification combined cycle technology under high carbon price scenario. Further, the paper proposes the short-term and long-term optimal investment strategy for the industry, and relevant policy suggestions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Notes

  1. According to “The Interim Measures for the Administration of CO2 Emissions Trading of Shenzhen Municipality,” if the emissions of an enterprise exceed the limit, it will be fined 3 times of the market value of the exceeded emissions. In addition, the emissions limit of the enterprise for the next year will be cut down by the exceeded amount. There may also be some other informal punishments such as covered by official media. So, the punishment is considerably severe that we assume any rational agent will not break the cap.

  2. http://www.cerx.cn/Portal/home.seam.

References

  • Abadie LM, Chamorro JM (2008) European CO2 prices and carbon capture investments. Energy Econ 30(6):2992–3015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanco MI, Rodrigues G (2008) Can the future EU ETS support wind energy investments? Energy Policy 36(4):1509–1520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonenti F, Oggioni G et al (2013) Evaluating the EU ETS impacts on profits, investments and prices of the Italian electricity market. Energy Policy 59:242–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang MS (2014) A scenario-based mixed integer linear programming model for composite power system expansion planning with greenhouse gas emission controls. Clean Technol Environ Policy 16(6):1000–1014

  • Chang DS, Yeh LT et al (2014) Incorporating the carbon footprint to measure industry context and energy consumption effect on environmental performance of business operations. Clean Technol Environ Policy 1–13. doi:10.1007/s10098-014-0785-9

  • China Huaneng (2013) The general introduction of Huaneng Tianjin IGCC Co., Ltd. Beijing. (in Chinese)

  • De Schepper E, Van Passel S et al (2014) Cost-efficient emission abatement of energy and transportation technologies: mitigation costs and policy impacts for Belgium. Clean Technol Environ Policy 16(6):1107–1118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellerman AD (2002) Designing a tradable permit system to control SO2 emissions in China: principles and practice. Energy J 23:1–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellerman D, Marcantonini C et al (2014) The EU ETS: eight years and counting. EUI working paper RSCAS 2014/04. European University Institute, Florence

  • Erdem HH, Akkaya AV et al (2009) Comparative energetic and exergetic performance analyses for coal-fired thermal power plants in Turkey. Int J Therm Sci 48(11):2179–2186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan J, Liu S et al (2012) Performance comparison and analysis of IGCC with CO2 emissions reduction. Coal Convers 35(4):80–83 (in Chinese)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fan J, Zhao D et al (2014) Carbon pricing and electricity market reforms in China. Clean Technol Environ Policy 16(5):921–933

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grubb M (2012) Emissions trading: cap and trade finds new energy. Nature 491(7426):666–667

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hasaneen R, Elsayed N et al (2014) Analysis of the technical, microeconomic, and political impact of a carbon tax on carbon dioxide sequestration resulting from liquefied natural gas production. Clean Technol Environ Policy 1–17. doi:10.1007/s10098-014-0735-6

  • Helm D (2008) Caps and floors for the EU ETS: a practical carbon price (Version for website)

  • Hoffmann VH (2007) EU ETS and investment decisions: the case of the German electricity industry. Eur Manag J 25(6):464–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laurikka H (2006) Option value of gasification technology within an emissions trading scheme. Energy Policy 34(18):3916–3928

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laurikka H, Koljonen T (2006) Emissions trading and investment decisions in the power sector—a case study in Finland. Energy Policy 34(9):1063–1074

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu J (2012) New 2 × 600 MW UCS project is built in Xin’an, Henan from http://www.chinaelc.cn/plus/view_dp.php?aid=47790 (in Chinese)

  • Raufer R, Li S (2009) Emissions trading in China: a conceptual ‘leapfrog’ approach? Energy 34(7):904–912

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shenzhen Research Center for Urban Development (2012) GHG Emissions Inventory of Shenzhen. Shenzhen (in Chinese)

  • Shenzhen Statistics Bureau and China Statistics Bureau’s Survey Office in Shenzhen (2013) Shenzhen statistical yearbook 2012. China Statistics Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh N (2013) Creating market support for energy efficiency—India’s perform, achieve and trade scheme. Clim Dev Knowl Netw

  • Siva Reddy V, Kaushik SC et al (2014) Exergetic analysis and evaluation of coal-fired supercritical thermal power plant and natural gas-fired combined cycle power plant. Clean Technol Environ Policy 16(3):489–499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SMEP (2011) Energy Audit Report of the Company. Shenzhen (in Chinese)

  • SMEP (2012a) GHG Emissions Quantification Report of the Company. Shenzhen (in Chinese)

  • SMEP (2012b) Self-auditing Report of Energy Conservation of the Company in 2011. Shenzhen (in Chinese)

  • Szolgayova J, Fuss S et al (2008) Assessing the effects of CO2 price caps on electricity investments—A real options analysis. Energy Policy 36(10):3974–3981

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TDRC (2013) The notice on the verification of the provisional on-grid price of Huaneng Tianjin IGCC Co.,Ltd. Tianjin (in Chinese)

  • Tursun H, Li Z et al (2014) Contribution weight of engineering technology on pollutant emission reduction based on IPAT and LMDI methods. Clean Technol Environ Policy 1–11

  • Yu L (2013) Energy saving and emissions reduction technology analysis of USC generator. Technol Dev Enterp 32(5):120–121 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y-J, Wei Y-M (2010) An overview of current research on EU ETS: evidence from its operating mechanism and economic effect. Appl Energy 87(6):1804–1814

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the anonymous reviewers and the editors for their insightful and helpful comments for the substantial improvement of the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lei Liu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huang, Y., Liu, L., Ma, X. et al. Abatement technology investment and emissions trading system: a case of coal-fired power industry of Shenzhen, China. Clean Techn Environ Policy 17, 811–817 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-014-0854-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-014-0854-0

Keywords

Navigation