Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

CFD-based modeling and design for energy-efficient VOC emission reduction in surface coating systems

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Volatile organic compounds (VOC’s) are among the most hazardous substances generated in surface coating operations. Hence, VOC emission must be strictly controlled. In this paper, we introduce a CFD-based system modeling and analysis approach to investigate VOC emission mechanisms and to identify the key design and operation parameters of a general surface coating application system for energy-efficient emission reduction. A case study on paint spray in different design environments demonstrates the efficacy of the introduced modeling and analysis approach. It shows that a redesign of the ventilation system of a spray booth and an adjustment of the operational parameter can reduce VOC emission to the level below the threshold limit value; meanwhile, the energy efficiency can be improved significantly. The introduced modeling and analysis technique for energy-efficient VOC reduction is applicable to various industrial practices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ACGIH (2004) American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH), Committee on Industrial Ventilation, Industrial Ventilation: a manual of recommended practice, 25th edn. ACGIH, Cincinnati

  • Colbert SA, Cairncross RA (2006) A discrete droplet transport model for predicting spray coating patterns of an electrostatic rotary atomizer. J Electrost 64:234–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunnett SJ (1994) Numerical study of the factors affecting worker exposure to contaminant. J Aerosol Sci 25:481–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellwood K, Braslaw J (1998) A finite-element model for an electrostatic bell sprayer. J Electrost 45:1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman RG, Ratner MH, Ptak T (1999) Chronic toxic encephalopathy in a painter exposed to mixed solvents. Environ Health Perspect 107:417–422

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Flynn MR, Sills ED (2000) On the use of computational fluid dynamics in the prediction and control of exposure to airborne contaminants—an illustration using spray painting. Ann Occup Hyg 44:191–202

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Flynn MR, Sills ED (2001) Numerical simulation of human exposure to aerosols generated during compressed air spray-painting in cross-flow ventilated booths. J Fluids Trans ASME 123(1):64–70

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fogliati M, Fontana D, Garbero M, Vanni M, Baldi G (2006) CFD simulation of paint deposition in an air spray process. J Coat Technol Res 3:117–125

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg D (2011) Low-VOC colorants for solventborne industrial coatings. Paint & Coatings Industry

  • Im KS, Lai MC, Yu ST (2004) Simulation of spray transfer processes in electrostatic rotary bell sprayer. J Fluids Eng 126:449–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim BR (2011) VOC emissions from automotive painting and their control: a review. Environ Eng Res 16:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim BR, Kalis EM, DeWulf T, Andrews KM (2000) Henry’s law constants for paint solvents and their implications on volatile organic compound emissions from automotive painting. Water Environ Res 72:65–742

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kim CN, Choi WH, Choung SJ, Park C, Kim DS (2002) Efficient ventilation of VOC spread in a small-scale painting process. Build Environ 37:1321–1328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li J, Xiao J, Huang YL, Lou HH (2007) Integrated process and product analysis: a multiscale approach to automotive paint spray. AIChE J 53:2841–2857

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lin MC, Zhivov AM, Underwood DM, Osborn DI, Woody A, Smith WP, Bjork C, Chimack MJ, Miller RA (2005) Process and energy optimization assessment level II analysis. Rock Island, Arsenal. ERDC/CERL TR-05-15

  • Lu WA, Howarth T (1996) Numerical analysis of indoor aerosol particle deposition and distribution in two-zone ventilation system. Build Environ 31:41–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry RH, Green DW (1997) Perry’s chemical engineers’ handbook, 7th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah U, Zhang C, Zhu J (2006) Comparison of electrostatic fine powder coating and coarse powder coating by numerical simulations. J Electrost 64:345–354

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Streitberger HJ, Urbano E, Laible R, Meyer BD, Bagda E, Waite FA, Philips M (2011) Paints and coatings, 3. Paint systems. Ullmann’s Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry. doi:10.1002/14356007.o18_o02.pub2

  • Tabor Z, Krzak M, Nowak P, Warszynski P (2012) Water diffusion in polymer coatings containing water-trapping particles. Part 1. Finite difference-based simulations. Prog Org Coat 75:200–206

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was in part supported by the National Science Foundation (No. 0700178).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yinlun Huang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Li, J., Uttarwar, R.G. & Huang, Y. CFD-based modeling and design for energy-efficient VOC emission reduction in surface coating systems. Clean Techn Environ Policy 15, 1023–1032 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-013-0583-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-013-0583-9

Keywords

Navigation