Skip to main content
Log in

Performance of anaerobic–anoxic–aerobic batch fed moving-bed reactor at varying phenol feed concentrations and hydraulic retention time

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A simulated wastewater containing phenol (1,000–2,500 mg/L), thiocyanate (SCN) of 800 mg/L, COD (4,200–8,150 mg/L), and ammonia–nitrogen (NH4 +–N) of 500 mg/L was treated in a sequential anaerobic (B1)–anoxic (B2)–aerobic (B3) batch fed moving-bed reactor (MBR) system. Total hydraulic retention time (HRT) was varied from 5 to 10 days with B1 2.5 to 5 days; B2 and B3: 1.25–2.5 days each. In B1, 25–63 % of phenol and 23–53 % of COD removals were achieved and feed phenol above 1,500 mg/L, inhibited COD and phenol removals in B1. In B2, more than 90 % phenol removal was achieved along with COD removal and denitrification. In B2, with increase in phenol loading, though phenol and COD removal rates increased, SCN removal rate decreased above phenol loading of 0.28 g/L day. In B3, NH4 +–N removal efficiency decreased above loading of 0.24 g NH4 +–N/L day. The overall efficiency of the fed batch MBR system was independent of feed phenol concentration up to 2,500 mg/L at constant total HRT of 6 days. NH4 +–N removal efficiency deteriorated significantly, when total HRT of fed batch MBR was less than 6 days. Modified Stover–Kincannon model showed the best fit for removal of substrates in three reactors and Haldane’s inhibition model predicted NH4 +–N removal in B3.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahn JH, Forster CF (2002) A comparison of mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic up flow filters treating paper–pulp-liquors. Process Biochem 38:257–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • APHA, AWWA, WPCF (1998) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 20th edn, American Public Health Association, Washington

  • Banerjee G (1996) Phenol- and thiocyanate-based wastewater treatment in RBC reactor. J Environ Eng 122:941–948

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cappuccino JG, Sherman N (1998) Microbiology: a laboratory manual Fifth edition. Benjamin/Cummings Science Publishing, California

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakraborty S, Veeramani H (2006) Effect of HRT and recycle ratio on removal of cyanide, phenol, thiocyanate and ammonia in an anaerobic–anoxic–aerobic continuous system. Process Biochem 41:96–105

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen S, Sun D, Chung J (2008) Simultaneous removal of COD and ammonium from landfill leachate using an anaerobic–aerobic moving bed biofilm reactor system. Waste Manage 28:339–346

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grau P, Dohanyas M, Chudoba J (1975) Kinetics of multicomponent substrate removal by activated sludge. Water Res 9:337–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeong YS, Chung JS (2006) Simultaneous removal of COD, thiocyanate, cyanide and nitrogen from coal process wastewater using fluidized biofilm process. Process Biochem 41:1141–1147

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson CH, Page MW, Blaha L (2000) Full scale moving bed biofilm reactor results from refinery and slaughterhouse treatment facilities. Water Sci Technol 41:401–407

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim YM, Park D, Jeon C, Lee DS, Park JM (2008) Effect of HRT on the biological pre-denitrification process for the simultaneous removal of toxic pollutants from cokes wastewater. Bioresource Technol 99:8824–8832

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kowalska M, Bodzek M, Bohdziewicz J (1998) Biodegradation of phenols and cyanides using membranes with immobilized microorganisms. Process Biochem 33(2):189–197

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kuscu OS, Sponza DT (2009) Kinetics of para-nitrophenol and chemical oxygen demand removal from synthetic wastewater in an anaerobic migrating blanket reactor. J Hazard Mater 161:787–799

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li YM, Gu GW, Zhao JF, Yu HQ, Qiu YL, Peng YZ (2003) Treatment of coke- plant wastewater by biofilm systems for removal of organic compounds and nitrogen. Chemosphere 52:997–1005

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li H, Han H, Du M, Wang W (2011) Removal of phenol, thiocyanate and ammonium from coal gasification wastewater using moving bed biofilm reactor. Bioresource Technol. 102:4667–4673

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Movahedin H, Shokoohi R, Parvaresh A, Hajia MJ, Jafari A (2006) Evaluating the Effect of glucose on phenol removal efficiency and changing the dominant microorganisms in the serial combined biological system. J Res Health Sci 6:8–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Rusten B, Siljudalen JG, Wien A, Eidem D (1998) Biological pre-treatment of poultry processing wastewater. Water Sci Technol 38:19–28

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sa CSA, Boaventura RAR (2001) Biodegradation of phenol by Pseudomonas putida DSM 548 in a trickling bed reactor. Biochem Eng J 9:211–219

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahariah BP, Chakraborty S (2011) Kinetic analysis of phenol, thiocyanate and ammonia-nitrogen removals in an anaerobic–anoxic–aerobic moving bed bioreactor system. J Hazard Mater 190:260–267

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Saravanan P (2008) Biodegradation of phenolic compounds, PhD thesis, submitted to Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, Guwahati

  • Sigrun JJ, Jukka AR, Ødegaard H (2002) Aerobic moving bed biofilm reactor treating thermomechanical pulping white water under thermophilic condition. Water Res 36:1067–1075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sorokin DY, Tourova TP, Antipov AN, Muyzer G, Kuenen JG (2004) Anaerobic growth of the haloalkaliphilic denitrifying sulphur-oxidizing bacterium Thialkalivibrio thiocyanodenitrificans sp. nov. with thiocyanate. Microbiology 150:2435–2442

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas S, Sarfaraz S, Mishra LC, Iyengar L (2002) Degradation of phenol and phenolic compounds by a defined denitrifying bacterial culture. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 18:57–63

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vàzquez I, Rodriguez J, Maranon E, Castrillon L, Fernandez Y (2006) Study of the aerobic biodegradation of coke wastewater in a two and three-step activated sludge process. J Hazard Mater B137:1681–1688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng S, Li W (2009) Effects of hydraulic loading and room temperature on performance of anaerobic/anoxic/aerobic system for ammonia–reidden and phenol rich coking effluents. Desalination 247:362–369

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu W, Huang X, Lee D (2009) Enhanced treatment of coke plant wastewater using an anaerobic–anoxic–oxic membrane bioreactor system. Sep Purif Technol 66:279–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Dr. Saswati Chakraborty would like to thank Ministry of Environment & Forest (MoEF), Govt. of India (No. 19-18/2003-RE) for financial support to this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Saswati Chakraborty.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sahariah, B.P., Chakraborty, S. Performance of anaerobic–anoxic–aerobic batch fed moving-bed reactor at varying phenol feed concentrations and hydraulic retention time. Clean Techn Environ Policy 15, 225–233 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-012-0499-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-012-0499-9

Keywords

Navigation