Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Reforming natural gas for CO2 pre-combustion capture in combined cycle power plant

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 26 November 2008

Abstract

The aim of this study is to assess the conversion of a natural gas combined cycle power plant (NGCC) using an advanced gas turbine (GE9H) for CO2 pre-combustion capture. The natural gas is reformed in an auto-thermal reformer (ATR) either with pure oxygen or with air. After water-shift conversion of CO into CO2 and physical CO2 recovery, the synthesis gas contains a high fraction of H2. It is diluted with N2 and steam to lower its low heating value (LHV) for NO X emission control. Oxygen purity and reforming pressure have little impact on the performances. High-pressure reforming is preferred to reduce the process size. Air reforming results in a slightly higher efficiency but in a bigger process too. The CO2 recovery rate has a big impact on the power plant efficiency since a lot of steam is required to lower the heating value (LHV) of the synthesis gas leaving the recovery process. Two values of LHV have been assessed. Steam consumption for natural gas reforming and synthesis gas dilution are the main consuming elements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Al-Sahhaf TA, Kidnay AJ, Dedy Sloan E (1983) Liquid + vapor equilibria in the N2 + CO2 + CH4 system. Ind Eng Chem Fundam 22:372–380

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Aroonwilas A, Veawab A (2007) Integration of CO2 capture unit using single- and blended-amines into supercritical coal-fired power plants: Implications for emission and energy management. Int J Greenh Gas Control 1:143–150

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Aspentech (2003) Aspen physical property system—physical property methods and models 12.1

  • Alie C, Backham L, Croiset E, Douglas PL (2005) Simulation of CO2 capture using MEA scrubbing: a flowsheet decomposition method. Energy Convers Manage 46(3):475–487

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson K, Maksinen P (2002) Process evaluation of CO2 free combustion in an O2/CO2 power plant. Master thesis T2002–258. Chalmers University of Technology, Sweden

  • Bertucco A, Elvassore N, Monteforte A (2003) Assessment of technical feasibility of CO2 capture and sequestration from flue gases by process simulation. In: Proceeding 6th Italian conference on chemical and process engineering, Pisa, Italy. Chemical engineering transactions, vol 3, pp 1093–1098

  • Bolland O, Mathieu P (1998) Comparison of two CO2 removal options in combined cycle power plants. Energy Convers Manage 39(16–18):1653–1663

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bolland O, Undrum H (2003) A novel methodology for comparing CO2 capture options for natural gas-fired combined cycle plants. Adv Environ Res 7:901–911

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cao W, Zheng D (2006) Exergy regeneration in an O2/CO2 gas turbine cycle with chemical recuperation by CO2 reforming of methane. Energy Convers Manage 47(18–19):3019–3030

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chiesa P, Consonni S (1999) Shift reactors and physical absorption for low-CO2 emission IGCCs. J Eng Gas Turbines Power 121:295–305

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen TS, Primdahl II (1994) Improve syngas production using autothermal reforming. Hydrocarbon Process 73(3):39–44

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Davison J (2007) Performance and costs of power plants with capture and storage of CO2. Energy 32:1163–1176

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Descamps C, Coquelet C, Bouallou C, Richon D (2005) Solubility of hydrogen in methanol at temperatures from 248.41 to 308.20 K. Thermochim Acta 430:1–7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ertesvåg IS, Kvamsdal HM, Boland O (2005) Exergy analysis of a gas-turbine combined cycle power plant with precombustion CO2 capture. Energy 30:5–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gambini M, Vellini M (2005) Comparative analysis of H2/O2 cycle power plants based on different hydrogen production systems from fossil fuels. Int J Hydrogen Energy 30:593–604

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kanniche M, Bouallou C (2007) CO2 capture study in advanced integrated gasification combined cycle. Appl Thermal Eng 27:2693–2702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klemeš J, Bulatov I, Cockerill T (2007) Techno-economic modelling and cost functions of CO2 capture processes. Comput Chem Eng 31:445–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohl A, Nielsen R (1997) Gas purification. Gulf Publishing Company, Houston

    Google Scholar 

  • Kvamsdal H, Jordal K, Bolland O (2007) A quantitative comparison of gas turbine cycles with CO2 capture. Energy 32:10–24

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Laursen T, Andersen SI (2002) High-pressure vapor–liquid equilibrium for nitrogen + methanol. J Chem Eng Data 47:1173–1174

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lozza G, Chiesa P (2002a) Natural gas decarbonization to reduce CO2 emission from combined cycles—part I: partial oxidation. J Eng Gas Turbines Power 124(1):82–88

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lozza G, Chiesa P (2002b) Natural gas decarbonization to reduce CO2 emission from combined cycles—part II: steam-methane reforming. J Eng Gas Turbines Power 124(1):89–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh D, Croiset E, Douglas PL, Douglas MA (2003) Techno-economic study of CO2 capture from an existing coal-fired power plant MEA scrubbing vs. O2/CO2 recycle combustion. Energy Convers Manage 44(19):3073–3091

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tarun CB, Croiset E, Douglas PL, Gupta M, Chowdhury MHM (2007) Techno-economic study of CO2 capture from natural gas based hydrogen plants. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 1:55–61

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weber W, Zeck S, Knapp H (1984) Gas solubilities in liquid solvents at high pressures: apparatus and results for binary and ternary systems of N2, CO2, and CH3OH. Fluid Phase Equilib 18:253–278

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yorizane M, Yoshimura S, Masuoka H, Miyano Y, Kakimoto Y (1985) New procedure for vapour–liquid equilibria. Nitrogen + Carbon Dioxide, Methane + Freon 22, and Methane + Freon 12. J Chem Eng Data 30:174–176

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zeck S, Knapp H (1986) Vapor–liquid and vapor–liquid–liquid phase equilibria for binary and ternary systems of nitrogen, ethane and methanol: experiment and data reduction. Fluid Phase Equilib 25:303–322

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank ARMINES and EDF (Electricité de France) for their financial support to this investigation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chakib Bouallou.

Additional information

An erratum to this article can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10098-008-0184-1

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Amann, JM., Kanniche, M. & Bouallou, C. Reforming natural gas for CO2 pre-combustion capture in combined cycle power plant. Clean Techn Environ Policy 11, 67–76 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-008-0167-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-008-0167-2

Keywords

Navigation