Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Investigation of relationships in a supply chain in order to improve environmental performance

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents a methodology to combine environmental assessment information and knowledge on supplier relationships. The work is based on a case study of production of a chair. The methods used are shown to be effective to reduce the number of suppliers that should be managed from an environmental point of view and also obtain an overview over which suppliers that can be influenced. It is also shown how suppliers with the presumably highest potential for improvements are identified. The end-producer can thus obtain control over most of the environmental impact originating from upstream activities through a limited number of suppliers. In the case study the number of suppliers that should be managed is reduced to 3. Small and medium sized enterprises have often limited possibilities to influence the suppliers, but in this paper it is demonstrated how this problem can be overcome by cooperative purchasing within a branch of industry with a common demand for information from the suppliers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. http://www.odin.dep.no/fad/norsk/tema/offentlig/p10002770/024081-990048/dok-bn.html.

  2. http://www.odin.dep.no/md/engelsk/regelverk/lover/022051-200017/dok-bn.html.

  3. Present EPDs are available on http://www.epd-norge.no/.

  4. see http://www.epd-norge.no/.

References

  • Brekke A, Klæboe G (2001) En livsløpsvurdering av helsemøbelet Ergo m/vipp. Project report. Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim [in Norwegian]

  • Clift R, Wright L (2000) Relationships between environmental impacts and added value along the supply chain. Technol Forecast Social Change 65:281–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christopher M (1998) Logistics and supply chain management. Strategies for reducing cost and improving service, 2nd ed. Financial Times/Prentice Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl T, Hagen Ø, Larssæther S (2002) Hågs miljøarbeid: Miljø som integrert og naturlig del av produkt og organisasjon. SINTEF Teknologiledelse IFIM, Rapport STF38 A02502, Trondheim [in Norwegian]

  • Dahlsrud A, Fet AM, Emilsen M, Nielsen MW (2002a) Teknisk rapport for livsløpsanalyse av stolen Mio IV. Working paper IØT 2/02. Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim [in Norwegian]

  • Dahlsrud A, Fet AM, Skjellum M (2002b) Teknisk rapport for livsløpsanalyse av stolen Bris. Working paper IØT 3/02. Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim [in Norwegian]

  • Diaz R, Redondo P (2002) Life cycle analysis applied to an innovative material obtained using secondary resources. In Abstracts from SETAC 10th LCA Case Symposium 2.-3. December, Barcelona, pp 99–101

  • Doucette WR (1997) Influences on member commitment to group purchasing organizations. J Bus Res 40:183–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fet AM, Dahlsrud A, Michelsen O (2003) Øko-effektive møbler – miljøindikatorer og dokumentasjon for kontraktsmøbler. Hovedrapport. IØT-Report 1/2003. Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim [in Norwegian]

  • Fet AM, Skaar C (2006) Eco-labeling, product category rules and certification procedures based on ISO 14025-requiremnts. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11(1):49–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fet AM, Skaar C, Riddervold B (2006) Møbeldatabase og miljødeklarasjoner for møbler. Working paper IØT 1/06. Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim [in Norwegian]

  • Forman M, Jørgensen MS (2004) Organising environmental supply chain management. Experience from a sector with frequent product shifts and complex product chains: The case of the Danish textile sector. Greener Manage Int 45:43–62

    Google Scholar 

  • El-Ansary A, Stern L (1972) Power measurement in the distribution channel. J Mark Res 9:47–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall J (2000) Environmental supply chain dynamics. J Clean Prod 8:455–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Handfield R, Sroufe R, Walton S (2005) Integrating environmental management and supply chain strategies. Bus Strategy Environ 14:1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Handfield R, Walton SV, Seegers LK, Melnyk SA (1997) ‘Green’ value chain practices in the furniture industry. J Operations Management 15:293–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hahn C, Watts D, Kim K (1990) The supplier development program: conceptual model. J Purchasing Manag Spring: 2–7

  • Håkansson H, Johanson J (1992) A model of industrial networks. In: Axelsson B, Easton G (eds) Industrial networks. Routledge, London, pp 28–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Håkansson H, Snehota I (eds) (1995) Developing relationships in business networks. Routledge, London

  • Holmen E, Pedersen AC (2003) Strategizing through analyzing and influencing the network horizon. Ind Mark Manage 32:409–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamann DJF, van der Vaart T, de Vries J (2004) Joint purchasing: theory and practice. International IPSERA Conference 4–7 April 2004. Catania, Italy

  • Kogg B (2003) Power and incentives in environmental supply chain management. In: Seuring S, Müller M, Goldbach M, Schneidewind U (eds) Strategy and organization in supply chains. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg, pp 65–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraljic P (1983) Purchasing must become supply management. Harvard business review (September-October), pp 109–117

  • Laing A, Cotton S (1997) Patterns of inter-organizational purchasing. Evolution of consortia-based purchasing amongst GP fundholders. Eur J Purchasing Supply Management 3:83–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambert DM, Cooper MC (2000) Issues in supply chain management. Ind Market Manage 29:65–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamming R, Hampson J (1996) The environment as a supply chain management issue. Br J Manage 7:45–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michelsen O (2004) Biodiversity indicators and environmental performance evaluations. Outline of a methodology. IndEcol-report 3/2004. Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim

  • Michelsen O (2006) Eco-efficiency in redesigned extended supply chains; furniture as an example. In: Huppes G, Ishikawa M (eds) Quantified eco-efficiency in theory and practice. Springer, Dordrecht (forthcoming)

  • Michelsen O, Fet AM, Dahlsrud A (2006) Eco-efficiency in extended supply chains: A case study of furniture production. J Environ Manage 79:290–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milà i Canals L, Bauer C, Depestele J, Dubreuil A, Freiermuth Knuchel R, Gaillard G, Michelsen O, Müller-Wenk R, Rydgren B (2006) Key elements in a framework for land use impact assessment within LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess http://dx.doi.org/10.1065/lca2006.05.250

  • Ministry of the Environment (1999) Stortingsmelding 8 (1999–2000) – Regjeringens miljøvernpolitikk og rikets miljøtilstand. Miljøverndepartementet, Oslo [in Norwegian]

  • Monczka R, Trent R, Handfield R (1998) Purchasing and supply chain management. South-Western College Publishing, Cincinnati

    Google Scholar 

  • Mudambi R, Schründer CP, Mongar A (2004) How co-operative is co-operative purchasing in smaller firms? Evidence from UK engineering SMEs. Long Range Plan 37:85–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pagell M, Krause DR (2002) Strategic consensus in the internal supply chain: exploring the manufacturing-purchasing link. Int J Prod Res 40:3075–3092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter ME, van der Linde C (1995) Green and competitive: ending the stalemate. Harvard Bus Rev 73(5):102–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Solevåg Ø (2005) Bruk av miljømerkingskrav i anbud. Stiftelsen Miljømerking, Oslo [in Norwegian]

  • Statistics Norway (2006) http://www.ssb.no/

  • Taylor AP, Postlethwaite D (1996) Overall business impact assessment (OBIA). In: 4th symposium for case studies. Society for Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC), Brussels, pp 181–187

  • Tella E, Virolainen VM (2005) Motives behind purchasing consortia. Int J Prod Econ 93–94:161–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zentes J, Swoboda B (2000) Allied groups on the road to complex networks. Technol in Soc 22:133–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This project is funded by the Research Council of Norway through the Productivity 2005—Industrial Ecology project (NFR126567/230). I would like to thank Professor Annik Magerholm Fet at NTNU for valuable comments and Christofer Skaar at NTNU for discussions on the use of the environmental database on furniture production.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Industrial Economics and Technology Management, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491, Trondheim, Norway

    Ottar Michelsen

Authors
  1. Ottar Michelsen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ottar Michelsen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Michelsen, O. Investigation of relationships in a supply chain in order to improve environmental performance. Clean Techn Environ Policy 9, 115–123 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-006-0071-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-006-0071-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation