Skip to main content
Log in

Aqueous and vapor phase mercury sorption by inorganic oxide materials functionalized with thiols and poly-thiols

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objective of the study is the development of sorbents where the sorption sites are highly accessible for the capture of mercury from aqueous and vapor streams. Only a small fraction of the equilibrium capacity is utilized for a sorbent in applications involving short residence times (e.g., vapor phase capture of mercury from coal-fired power plant flue gases). So, dynamic capacity rather than equilibrium capacity is more relevant for these kinds of situations. Rapid sorption rates and higher dynamic capacity can be achieved by increasing the accessibility of active sites and decreasing the diffusional resistance to mass transport for the adsorbing species. This requires the use of open structured sorbent materials and attachment of functional groups on the external surface area of supports. The strong interaction of sulfur containing ligands (e.g., thiol) with mercury makes them suitable candidates for immobilization on these types of materials. In this study, inorganic oxide supports like alumina and silica are functionalized with thiol moieties like mercapto silane, cysteine and poly-cysteine for capturing mercury from aqueous and vapor phase. Aqueous phase Hg (II) sorption studies with cysteine/poly-cysteine functionalized silica showed that high dynamic capacity can be achieved by attaching active sites (thiol) on the external area of supports. Vapor phase Hg capture studies with thiol-functionalized mesoporous silica (Hg0 concentration = 3.37 mg/m3 with N2 as the carrier, gas temperature = 70 °C) yielded a capacity of 143 μg Hg/g for the sorbent. Although the sulfur content for the sorbent was low (0.80 wt. %) the molar ratio of Hg captured to sulfur was comparatively high (2.86×10−3) pointing to the high accessibility of sulfur sites.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3 a
Fig. 4
Fig. 5 a
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beauvais RA, Alexandratos SD (1998) Polymer-supported reagents for the selective complexation of metal ions: an overview. React Func Polym 36:113–123

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharyya D, Butterfield DA (2003) New insights into membrane science and technology: polymeric and biofunctional membranes. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Bibby A, Mercier L (2002) Mercury (II) ion adsorption behavior in thiol-functionalized mesoporous silica microspheres. Chem Mater 14:1591–1597

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brown J, Richer R, Mercier L (2000) One-step synthesis of high capacity mesoporous Hg2+ adsorbents by non-ionic surfactant assembly. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 37:41–48

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • EPA (1997) Mercury study report to congress. Technical Report EPA-452/R-97–003, EPA, Triangle Research Park, North Carolina

  • Feng X, Fryxell GE, Wang L-Q, Kim AY, Liu J, Kemner KM (1997) Functionalized monolayers on ordered mesoporous supports. Science 276:923–926

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galbreath KC, Zygarlicke CJ (1996) Mercury speciation in coal combustion and gasification flue gases. Environ Sci Technol 30:2421–2426

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Granite EJ, Pennline HW, Hargis RA (2000) Novel sorbents for mercury removal from flue gas. Ind Eng Chem Res 39:1020–1029

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gregg SJ, Sing KSW (1967) Adsorption, surface area and porosity. Academic Press, London

  • Ghorishi SB, Keeney RM, Serre DS, Gullett BK, Jozewicz WS (2002) Development of a Cl-impregnated activated carbon for entrained-flow capture of elemental mercury. Environ Sci Technol 36:4454–4459

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Helfferich F (1995) Ion exchange. Dover, New York

  • Hornback JI (1998) Organic chemistry. Brooks/Cole, California

  • Hsi H-C, Rood MJ, Rostam-Abadi M, Chen S, Chang R (2001) Mercury adsorption properties of sulfur-impregnated adsorbents. J Environ Eng 128:1080–1089

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iler RK (1979) The chemistry of silica: solubility polymerization colloid and surface properties and biochemistry of silica. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kostal J, Mulchandani A, Chen W(2001) Tunable biopolymers for heavy metal removal. Macromolecules 34:2257–2261

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Krishnan SV, Gullett BK, Jozewicz W, (1994) Sorption of elemental mercury by activated carbons. Environ Sci Technol 28:1506–1512

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu W, Vidic RD, Brown TD (2000) Impact of flue gas conditions on mercury uptake by sulfur-impregnated activated carbon. Environ Sci Technol 34:154–159

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marcus Y, SenGupta AK, Marinsky JA (2002) Ion exchange and solvent extraction, vol 15. Dekker, New York

  • Martinez RF, Rucandio MI (2003) Study of extraction conditions for the quantitative determination of Hg bound to sulfide in soils from Almaden (Spain). Anal Bioanal Chem 375:1089–1096

    Google Scholar 

  • Martell AE, Smith RM, Motekaitis RM (1995) NIST critically selected stability constants of metal complexes. NIST Standard Reference Database 46 Version 20, NIST Standard Reference Data, Gaithersburg, Maryland

  • Mercier L, Pinnavaia TJ (1998a) Heavy metal ion adsorbents formed by the grafting of a thiol functionality to mesoporous silica molecular sieves: factors affecting Hg (II) uptake Environ Sci Technol 32:2749–2754

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercier L, Pinnavaia TJ (1998b) A functionalized porous clay heterostructure for heavy metal ion (Hg2+) trapping. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 20:101–106

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miller TC, Kwak E-S, Howard ME, Bout DAV, Holcombe JA (2001) An in situ study of metal complexation by an immobilized synthetic biopolymer using tapping mode cell atomic force microscopy. Anal Chem 73:4087–4095

    Google Scholar 

  • Nam KH, Gomez-Salazar S, Tavlarides LL (2003) Mercury (II) sorption from waste waters using a thiol functional adsorbent. Ind Eng Chem Res 42:1955–1964

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pitoniak E, Wu C-Y, Londeree D, Mazyck D, Bonzongo J-C, Powers K, Sigmund W (2003) Nanostructured silica-gel doped with TiO2 for mercury vapor control. J Nanoparticle Res 5:281–292

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pitzer KS (1991) Activity coefficients in electrolyte systems 2nd edn. CRC, Boca Raton, Florida

  • Ritchie SMC, Kissick KE, Bachas LG, Sikdar SK, Parikh C, Bhattacharyya D (2001) Polycysteine and other poly amino acid functionalized microfiltration membranes for heavy metal capture. Environ Sci Technol 35:3252–3258

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ruthven DM (1984) Principles of adsorption and adsorption processes. Wiley, New York, pp 180–183

  • SenGupta A K (2002) Environmental separation of heavy metals: engineering processes. Lewis, Boca Raton, Florida

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt-Winkel P, Lukens WW, Zhao D, Yang P, Chemelka BF, Stucky GD (1999) Mesocellular siliceous foams with uniformly sized cells and windows. J Am Chem Soc 121:254–255

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shendrikar A, Damie A, Gutkneckt WF (1984) Technical report, EPA-600/7–84–089, US EPA, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina

  • Suzuki M (1990) Adsorption engineering. In: Chemical engineering monographs, vol 25. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 97–99

  • Vidic RD, Siler DP (2001) Vapor-phase elemental mercury adsorption by activated carbon impregnated with chloride and chelating agents. Carbon 39:3–14

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Walcarius A, Etienne M, Bessiere J (2002) Rate of access to the binding sites in organically modified silicates. 1. Amorphous silica gels grafted with amine or thiol groups. Chem Mater 14:2757–2766

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The project has been funded by the US EPA and their support is highly appreciated. Thanks are also due to Vasilie Smuleac for his help in functionalizing the alumina membranes. The authors are thankful to Tricia Coakely at the Environmental Research and Training Laboratory (ERTL), University of Kentucky, Lexington for her help in aqueous Hg analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Bhattacharyya.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Makkuni, A., Bachas, L.G., Varma, R.S. et al. Aqueous and vapor phase mercury sorption by inorganic oxide materials functionalized with thiols and poly-thiols. Clean Techn Environ Policy 7, 87–96 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-004-0260-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-004-0260-0

Keywords

Navigation