Abstract
This paper gives a brief presentation of the industrial ecology study and research programs at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU). These programs have been running for a few years, and they have recently been evaluated. The revised program will be presented. A central topic within the framework of industrial ecology is eco-efficiency. Eco-efficiency should be a tool for measuring internal progress as well as a tool for communicating level of economic and environmental performance. Some of the research projects in the NTNU program deal with this concept. Effort has been put into clarifying the terminology of eco-efficiency, the definitions and the methodologies for selecting eco-efficiency indicators, and how they can be used for reporting purposes and as a tool for improvement measures. The paper presents examples of the use of indicators for eco-efficiency measures both for production sites and for products and value chains. The paper further gives an overview of upcoming international requirements to environmental reporting in the context of industrial ecology. Here we find different types of reporting initiatives, e.g. that eco-efficiency reports inform about economic performance in addition to the environmental performance while sustainability reports encompasses social, economic and environmental aspects, the "triple bottom line". Today we see a move from traditional environmental reporting to eco-efficiency reporting and sustainability reporting. For products, we see an international standardisation effort of environmental product declarations (EPDs). Among the research activities at the industrial ecology program at NTNU, is the search for eco-efficiency indicators that can be harmonised with the product declaration standards.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
BASF (2002) www.basf.de/en/umwelt/oekoeffizienz
DeSimone LD, Popoff F (1997) Eco-efficiency: the business link to sustainable development. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Fet AM, Dahlsrud A, Michelsen O (2003) Eco-efficient furnitures. Report in progress
GRI (2000) Sustainability reporting guidelines on economic, environmental and social performance. Global Reporting Initiative, http://www.globalreporting.org
Hall J (2000) Environmental supply chain dynamics. J Clean Prod 8:455–471
IndEcol Programme (2002) http://www.bygg.ntnu.no/indecol/, P2005: http://www.p2005.ntnu.no/
ISO 14020: Environmental labels and declarations—general principles
ISO 14021: Environmental labels and declarations—self-declared environmental claims (Type II environmental labelling)
ISO 14024: Environmental labels and declarations—Type I environmental labelling—principles and procedures
ISO TR 14025: Environmental labels and declarations—Type III environmental declarations
Keffer C, Shimp R, Lehni M (2000) Eco-efficiency indicators and reporting. Report on the status for the Final Printed Report (updated 23 February 2000). WBCSD
Lehni M (2000) Eco-efficiency—creating more value with less impact. WBCSD, http://www.wbcsd.org/newscenter/reports/2000/EEcreating.pdf
OECD (1998) Eco-efficiency. OECD, Paris
OECD (2001) Policies to enhance sustainable development, OECD, Paris
Olivin AS (2001) Environmental Report 2000, Aaheim, May, Norway
Saling P, Kicherer A, Dittrich-Krämer B, Wittlinger R, Zombik W, Scmidt I, Schrott W, Schmidt S (2002) Eco-efficiency analysis by BASF: the method. Int J LCA 7:203–218
Schmidheiny S (1992) Changing course: a global business perspective on development and the environment. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Verfaillie HA, Bidwell R (2000) Measuring eco-efficiency—a guide to reporting company performance. WBCSD, http://www.wbcsd.org/newscenter/reports/2000/MeasuringEE.pdf
Acknowledgements
This paper was presented at the NATO/CCMS Pilot Study on Cleaner Products and Processes, Vilnius, Lithuania, 12–16 May 2002.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fet, A.M., Michelsen, O. Industrial ecology study and research program at Norwegian University of Science and Technology. Clean Techn Environ Policy 5, 95–100 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-003-0212-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-003-0212-0