Skip to main content
Log in

A comparison of Sensititre™ Anaerobe MIC plate with ATB ANA® test for the routine susceptibility testing of common anaerobe pathogens

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The accuracy of the Thermo Scientific™ Sensititre™ Anaerobe MIC plate was assessed against the ATB ANA® test (bioMérieux) on 56 clinically relevant anaerobic strains collected at Geneva University Hospitals. The overall categorical agreement between both methods reached 95%. The Sensititre™ Anaerobe MIC plate had excellent accuracy for most antibiotics tested. When the Sensititre™ Anaerobe MIC plate disagreed with ATB ANA® test, the gradient strip method resolved the antimicrobial susceptibility categories of all the antibiotics tested, except for piperacillin, piperacillin-tazobactam, and penicillin, in favor of the Sensititre™ Anaerobe MIC plate (58% [21 out of 36]). Several very major errors were observed for piperacillin (12.5% [7 out of 56]), piperacillin-tazobactam (12.5% [7 out of 56]), and penicillin (2% [1 out of 56]). The gradient strip method revealed that the categorical differences for piperacillin, piperacillin-tazobactam, and penicillin were at least partly explained by heterogeneity in resistance expression. The Sensititre™ Anaerobe MIC plate offers therefore a useful alternative to the ATB ANA® test for the routine antimicrobial susceptibility testing of anaerobes in clinical microbiology laboratories.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hecht DW (2004) Prevalence of antibiotic resistance in anaerobic bacteria: worrisome developments. Clin Infect Dis 39(1):92–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Brook I, Wexler HM, Goldstein EJ (2013) Antianaerobic antimicrobials: spectrum and susceptibility testing. Clin Microbiol Rev 26(3):526–546

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kim J, Lee Y, Park Y, Kim M, Choi JY, Yong D, Jeong SH, Lee K (2016) Anaerobic bacteremia: impact of inappropriate therapy on mortality. Infect Chemother 48(2):91–98

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Salonen JH, Eerola E, Meurman O (1998) Clinical significance and outcome of anaerobic bacteremia. Clin Infect Dis 26(6):1413–1417

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Boyanova L, Kolarov R, Mitov I (2015) Recent evolution of antibiotic resistance in the anaerobes as compared to previous decades. Anaerobe 31:4–10

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Simmon KE, Mirrett S, Reller LB, Petti CA (2008) Genotypic diversity of anaerobic isolates from bloodstream infections. J Clin Microbiol 46(5):1596–1601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lin YT, Vaneechoutte M, Huang AH, Teng LJ, Chen HM, Su SL, Chang TC (2010) Identification of clinically important anaerobic bacteria by an oligonucleotide array. J Clin Microbiol 48(4):1283–1290

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Garner O, Mochon A, Branda J, Burnham CA, Bythrow M, Ferraro M, Ginocchio C, Jennemann R, Manji R, Procop GW, Richter S, Rychert J, Sercia L, Westblade L, Lewinski M (2014) Multi-centre evaluation of mass spectrometric identification of anaerobic bacteria using the VITEK(R) MS system. Clin Microbiol Infect 20(4):335–339

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Nagy E, Urban E, Nord CE, Bacteria ESGARA (2011) Antimicrobial susceptibility of Bacteroides fragilis group isolates in Europe: 20 years of experience. Clin Microbiol Infect 17(3):371–379

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Karlowsky JA, Walkty AJ, Adam HJ, Baxter MR, Hoban DJ, Zhanel GG (2012) Prevalence of antimicrobial resistance among clinical isolates of Bacteroides fragilis group in Canada in 2010-2011: CANWARD surveillance study. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 56(3):1247–1252

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Brook I (2007) The role of anaerobic bacteria in upper respiratory tract and other head and neck infections. Curr Infect Dis Rep 9(3):208–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hentges DJ (1993) The anaerobic microflora of the human body. Clin Infect Dis 16(Suppl 4):S175–S180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Whittle G, Shoemaker NB, Salyers AA (2002) The role of Bacteroides conjugative transposons in the dissemination of antibiotic resistance genes. Cell Mol Life Sci 59(12):2044–2054

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Bonheyo GT, Hund BD, Shoemaker NB, Salyers AA (2001) Transfer region of a Bacteroides conjugative transposon contains regulatory as well as structural genes. Plasmid 46(3):202–209

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Shoemaker NB, Vlamakis H, Hayes K, Salyers AA (2001) Evidence for extensive resistance gene transfer among Bacteroides spp. and among Bacteroides and other genera in the human colon. Appl Environ Microbiol 67(2):561–568

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Shubert C, Slaughter J, Creely D, van Belkum A, Gayral JP, Dunne WM, Zambardi G, Shortridge D (2014) Population analysis of Escherichia coli isolates with discordant resistance levels by piperacillin-tazobactam broth microdilution and agar dilution testing. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 58(3):1779–1781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Morand B, Muhlemann K (2007) Heteroresistance to penicillin in Streptococcus pneumoniae. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104(35):14098–14103

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Cherkaoui A, Diene SM, Renzoni A, Emonet S, Renzi G, Francois P, Schrenzel J (2017) Imipenem heteroresistance in nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae is linked to a combination of altered PBP3, slow drug influx and direct efflux regulation. Clin Microbiol Infect 23(2):118 e119–118 e119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Falagas ME, Makris GC, Dimopoulos G, Matthaiou DK (2008) Heteroresistance: a concern of increasing clinical significance? Clin Microbiol Infect 14(2):101–104

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was presented as a poster abstract in the Annual Congress of the Swiss Society for Microbiology 2018, 28th to 30th of August.

Funding

This study was performed by using internal funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abdessalam Cherkaoui.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cherkaoui, A., Fischer, A., Azam, N. et al. A comparison of Sensititre™ Anaerobe MIC plate with ATB ANA® test for the routine susceptibility testing of common anaerobe pathogens. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 37, 2279–2284 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-018-3369-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-018-3369-5

Keywords

Navigation