Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparison of ELISA and indirect immunofluorescent antibody assay detecting Coxiella burnetii IgM phase II for the diagnosis of acute Q fever

  • Research Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) detecting Coxiella burnetii phase II-specific IgM for the diagnosis of acute Q fever was compared with indirect immunofluorescent antibody assay (IFA). IFA is the current reference method for the detection of antibodies against C. burnetii, but has disadvantages because the judgment of fluorescence is subjective and tiring, and the test is expensive and automation is not possible. To examine whether phase II IgM ELISA could be used as a screening assay for acute Q fever, we compared the sensitivity and specificity of IFA and ELISA. The sensitivity of the IFA and ELISA tests were 100 and 85.7%, respectively, with a specificity of 95.3 and 97.6%, respectively. Because of the high sensitivity and specificity of the ELISA in combination with the practical disadvantages of the IFA, we introduced a new algorithm to screen samples of patients with symptoms of acute Q fever infection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Raoult D, Marrie TJ, Mege JL (2005) Natural history and pathophysiology of Q fever. Lancet Infect Dis 5:219–226

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Fournier PE, Marrie TJ, Raoult D (1998) Diagnosis of Q fever. J Clin Microbiol 36:1823–1834

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Dupuis G, Péter O, Peacock M, Burgdorfer W, Haller E (1985) Immunoglobulin responses in acute Q fever. J Clin Microbiol 22:484–487

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Péter O, Dupuis G, Bee D, Lüthy R, Nicolet J, Burgdorfer W (1988) Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for diagnosis of chronic Q fever. J Clin Microbiol 26:1978–1982

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Schneeberger PM, Hermans MHA, van Hannen EJ, Schellekens JJA, Leenders ACAP, Wever PC (2010) Real-time PCR with serum samples is indispensable for early diagnosis of acute Q fever. Clin Vaccine Immunol 17(2):286–290

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Schimmer B, Dijkstra F, Vellema P, Schneeberger PM, Hackert V, ter Schegget R, Wijkmans C, van Duynhoven Y, van der Hoek W (2009) Sustained intensive transmission of Q fever in the south of the Netherlands, 2009. Euro Surveill 14(19):pii=19210. Available online at: http://www.eurosurveillance.org/ViewArticle.aspx?ArticleId=19210

  7. Jager MM, Weers-Pothoff G, Hermans MHA, Meekelenkamp JCE, Schellekens JJA, Renders NHM, Leenders ACAP, Schneeberger PM, Wever PC (2011) Evaluation of a diagnostic algorithm for acute Q fever in an outbreak setting. Clin Vaccine Immunol 18(6):963–968

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Field PR, Mitchell JL, Santiago A, Dickeson DJ, Chan SW, Ho DWT, Murphy AM, Cuzzubbo AJ, Devine PL (2000) Comparison of a commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay with immunofluorescence and complement fixation tests for detection of Coxiella burnetii (Q fever) immunoglobulin M. J Clin Microbiol 38:1645–1647

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. C. E. Meekelenkamp.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Meekelenkamp, J.C.E., Schneeberger, P.M., Wever, P.C. et al. Comparison of ELISA and indirect immunofluorescent antibody assay detecting Coxiella burnetii IgM phase II for the diagnosis of acute Q fever. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 31, 1267–1270 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-011-1438-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-011-1438-0

Keywords

Navigation