Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Compliance with recommendations and clinical outcomes for formal and informal infectious disease specialist consultations

  • Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare compliance with recommendations and clinical outcomes between formal and informal infectious disease specialist consultations. Six hundred twenty-seven consecutive adult inpatients who received an infectious disease consultation in a university-affiliated hospital were included. After adjusting for quintile of propensity score, we compared compliance with the consultant’s recommendations and clinical outcomes for 443 (70.7%) and 184 (29.3%) formal and informal consultations. Informal and formal consultations were associated with comparable levels of compliance with recommendations for antimicrobial treatment (86.5% vs 88.9%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.63; 95% confidence interval, 0.34–1.14; P = 0.13) and diagnostic or monitoring tests (72.6% vs 72.0%; aOR, 0.91 [0.53–1.57]; P = 0.73). The rates of early clinical improvement (58.2% vs 58.6%; aOR, 1.11 [0.70–1.74]; P = 0.66), subsequent consultation (34.2% vs 36.3%; aOR, 0.80 [0.53–1.21]; P = 0.29), in-hospital mortality (4.9% vs 8.4%; aOR, 0.55 [0.24–1.24]; P = 0.15), and the median length of stay (23 vs 20 days; aOR of discharge, 0.90 [0.74–1.10]; P = 0.30) did not differ depending on the type of consultation. This study provides observational evidence that informal consultations result in levels of compliance with recommendations comparable to formal consultations, without compromising patient safety. Further study is needed to refine the criteria for requesting or providing informal rather than formal consultations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Golub RM (1998) Curbside consultations and the viaduct effect. JAMA 280(10):929–930

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Forrest CB (2009) A typology of specialists' clinical roles. Arch Intern Med 169(11):1062–1068

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gennai S, Francois P, Sellier E, Vittoz JP, Hincky-Vitrat V, Pavese P. (2010) Prospective study of telephone calls to a hotline for infectious disease consultation: analysis of 7,863 solicited consultations over a 1-year period. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. [Epub ahead of print]

  4. Kuo D, Gifford DR, Stein MD (1998) Curbside consultation practices and attitudes among primary care physicians and medical subspecialists. JAMA 280(10):905–909

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Pearson SD, Moreno R, Trnka Y (1998) Informal consultations provided to general internists by the gastroenterology department of an HMO. J Gen Intern Med 13(7):435–438

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Borowsky SJ (1998) What do we really need to know about consultation and referral? J Gen Intern Med 13(7):497–498

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Keating NL, Zaslavsky AM, Ayanian JZ (1998) Physicians' experiences and beliefs regarding informal consultation. JAMA 280(10):900–904

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Manian FA, Janssen DA (1996) Curbside consultations. A closer look at a common practice. JAMA 275(2):145–147

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Fox BC, Siegel ML, Weinstein RA (1996) "Curbside" consultation and informal communication in medical practice: a medicolegal perspective. Clin Infect Dis 23(3):616–622

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Duncan CJ, Gallacher K, Kennedy DH, Fox R, Seaton RA, MacConnachie AA (2007) Infectious disease telephone consultations: Numerous, varied and an important educational resource. J Infect 54(5):515–516

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Leblebicioglu H, Akbulut A, Ulusoy S et al (2003) Informal consultations in infectious diseases and clinical microbiology practice. Clin Microbiol Infect 9(7):724–726

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Schlesinger Y, Paltiel O, Yinnon AM (1998) Analysis and impact of infectious disease consultations in a general hospital. J Hosp Infect 40(1):39–46

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Yinnon AM (2001) Whither infectious diseases consultations? Analysis of 14,005 consultations from a 5-year period. Clin Infect Dis 33(10):1661–1667

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ballard WP, Gold JP, Charlson ME (1986) Compliance with the recommendations of medical consultants. J Gen Intern Med 1(4):220–224

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Sears CL, Charlson ME (1983) The effectiveness of a consultation. Compliance with initial recommendations. Am J Med 74(5):870–876

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Sellier E, Pavese P, Gennai S, Stahl JP, Labarere J, Francois P (2010) Factors and outcomes associated with physicians' adherence to recommendations of infectious disease consultations for inpatients. J Antimicrob Chemother 65(1):156–162

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gotzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP (2007) The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Ann Intern Med 147(8):573–577

    Google Scholar 

  18. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chron Dis 40(5):373–383

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Eron LJ, Passos S (2001) Early discharge of infected patients through appropriate antibiotic use. Arch Intern Med 161(1):61–65

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Halm EA, Fine MJ, Marrie TJ et al (1998) Time to clinical stability in patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia: implications for practice guidelines. JAMA 279(18):1452–1457

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. D'Agostino RB Jr (1998) Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group. Stat Med 17(19):2265–2281

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Joffe MM, Rosenbaum PR (1999) Invited commentary: propensity scores. Am J Epidemiol 150(4):327–333

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Myers JP (1984) Curbside consultation in infectious diseases: a prospective study. J Infect Dis 150(6):797–802

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Lo E, Rezai K, Evans AT et al (2004) Why don't they listen? Adherence to recommendations of infectious disease consultations. Clin Infect Dis 38(9):1212–1218

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Conley J, Jordan M, Ghali WA (2009) Audit of the consultation process on general internal medicine services. Qual Saf Health Care 18(1):59–62

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Salerno SM, Hurst FP, Halvorson S, Mercado DL (2007) Principles of effective consultation: an update for the 21st-century consultant. Arch Intern Med 167(3):271–275

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. McPhee SJ, Lo B, Saika GY, Meltzer R (1984) How good is communication between primary care physicians and subspecialty consultants? Arch Intern Med 144(6):1265–1268

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Fox BC (1996) Medical-legal aspects of curbside consultation. JAMA 276(20):1635–1636

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Quality of Care Unit, Pavillon Taillefer, University Hospital, CHU BP 217, 38043, Grenoble Cedex 9, France

    E. Sellier, J. Labarère, G. Bal & P. François

  2. Techniques de l’Ingénierie Médicale et de la Complexité (TIMC), ThEMAS, Unité Mixte de Recherche 5525, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Université Joseph Fourier - Grenoble 1, 38041, Grenoble, France

    E. Sellier & P. François

  3. Techniques de l’Ingénierie Médicale et de la Complexité (TIMC), Biologie Computationnelle et Mathématique, Unité Mixte de Recherche 5525, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Université Joseph Fourier - Grenoble 1, 38041, Grenoble, France

    J. Labarère

  4. Department of Infectious Diseases, University Hospital, 38043, Grenoble, France

    S. Gennai & P. Pavese

Authors
  1. E. Sellier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. J. Labarère
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. S. Gennai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. G. Bal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. P. François
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. P. Pavese
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. Sellier.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sellier, E., Labarère, J., Gennai, S. et al. Compliance with recommendations and clinical outcomes for formal and informal infectious disease specialist consultations. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 30, 887–894 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-011-1172-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-011-1172-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation