Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Antimicrobial resistance and molecular characterization of Staphylococcus haemolyticus in a Chinese hospital

  • Brief Report
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study was to perform the molecular characterization of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus haemolyticus (MRSH) from clinical specimens of patients in a Chinese hospital. One hundred and thirty-three strains of S. haemolyticus collected from April 2002 to April 2003 were analyzed. Antimicrobial susceptibility to 15 antimicrobial agents was determined by the broth microdilution method. The resistant rates to penicillin G and oxacillin were higher than 90%. There were no isolates resistant to linezolid or vancomycin, and only 6.0% of the strains were resistant to teicoplanin. The positivity rate for mecA genes was 90.2% by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Ninety MRSH (isolated from inpatients and mecA-gene-positive) were genotyped by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) after SmaI digestion. Twenty-five different PFGE patterns (A∼Y) were found and a major clone (type A; n = 36) with five subtypes was identified. Clone A was detected during a 1-year period. Identical PFGE types were found in different wards and patients. The results of this study suggest the clonal spread of MRSH within our hospital. This emphasizes the need for control and prevention measures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. Kloos WE, Bannerman TL (1994) Update on clinical significance of coagulase-negative staphylococci. Clin Microbiol Rev 7(1):117–140

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Falcone M, Micozzi A, Pompeo ME, Baiocchi P, Fabi F, Penni A, Martino P, Venditti M (2004) Methicillin-resistant staphylococcal bacteremia in patients with hematologic malignancies: clinical and microbiological retrospective comparative analysis of S. haemolyticus, S. epidermidis and S. epidermidis. J Chemother 16(6):540–548

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Raponi G, Ghezzi MC, Gherardi G, Dicuonzo G, Caputo D, Venditti M, Rocco M, Micozzi A, Mancini C (2005) Antimicrobial susceptibility, biochemical and genetic profiles of Staphylococcus haemolyticus strains isolated from the bloodstream of patients hospitalized in critical care units. J Chemother 17(3):264–269

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Santos Sanches I, Mato R, de Lencastre H, Tomasz A (2000) Patterns of multidrug resistance among methicillin-resistant hospital isolates of coagulase-positive and coagulase-negative staphylococci collected in the international multicenter study RESIST in 1997 and 1998. Microb Drug Resist 6(3):199–211

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mayhall CG (2004) Hospital epidemiology and infection control. Lippincott Wiliams and Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 495–510

    Google Scholar 

  6. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) (2006) Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing; Sixteenth Informational Supplement. CLSI document M100-S16, vol. 26-3; M7-A7, vol. 26-2; M2-A9, vol. 26-1. CLSI, Wayne, PA

  7. Degener JE, Heck ME, van Leeuwen WJ, Heemskerk C, Crielaard A, Joosten P, Caesar P (1994) Nosocomial infection by Staphylococcus haemolyticus and typing methods for epidemiological study. J Clin Microbiol 32(9):2260–2265

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Biavasco F, Vignaroli C, Lazzarini R, Varaldo PE (2000) Glycopeptide susceptibility profiles of Staphylococcus haemolyticus bloodstream isolates. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 44(11):3122–3126

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Song MD, Wachi M, Doi M, Ishino F, Matsuhashi M (1987) Evolution of an inducible penicillin-target protein in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus by gene fusion. FEBS Lett 221(1):167–171

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Prevost G, Jaulhac B, Piemont Y (1992) DNA fingerprinting by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis is more effective than ribotyping in distinguishing among methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates. J Clin Microbiol 30(4):967–973

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Tenover FC, Arbeit RD, Goering RV, Mickelsen PA, Murray BE, Persing DH, Swaminathan B (1995) Interpreting chromosomal DNA restriction patterns produced by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis: criteria for bacterial strain typing. J Clin Microbiol 33(9):2233–2239

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Campanile F, Bongiorno D, Borbone S, Falcone M, Giannella M, Venditti M, Stefani S (2008) In vitro activity of daptomycin against methicillin- and multi-resistant Staphylococcus haemolyticus invasive isolates carrying different mec complexes. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 61(2):227–231

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mohammedi I, Malhière S, Robert D, Charveriat MA, Etienne J (2006) Linezolid therapy of bloodborne teicoplanin-resistant Staphylococcus haemolyticus. Infection 34(5):292–293

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. de Mattos EM, Teixeira LA, Alves VM, Rezenda e Resende CA, da Silva Coimbra MV, da Silva-Carvalho MC, Ferreira-Carvalho BT, Figueiredo AM (2003) Isolation of methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci from patients undergoing continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) and comparison of different molecular techniques for discriminating isolates of Staphylococcus epidermidis. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 45(1):13–22

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Y.-S. Yu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yu, MH., Chen, YG., Yu, YS. et al. Antimicrobial resistance and molecular characterization of Staphylococcus haemolyticus in a Chinese hospital. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 29, 613–616 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-010-0893-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-010-0893-3

Keywords

Navigation