Abstract
This nationwide surveillance of clinically important bacteria from the intensive care units (ICUs) of major teaching hospitals throughout Taiwan investigated the susceptibilities to doripenem and other comparator carbapenems from September through November 2005. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined for 1,311 clinical isolates using the broth microdilution method according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) 2005 guidelines. Doripenem showed similar (within four-fold difference of MICs) in vitro activity to meropenem for Enterobacteriaceae and probably comparable activity to meropenem against important nosocomial non-fermentative Gram-negative bacilli (NFGNBs), including Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii and Burkholderia cepacia. Among the four carbapenems analysed, doripenem and meropenem exhibited better in vitro activity than imipenem or ertapenem against extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli isolates. However, the meropenem MIC90 against ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae isolates was 2 µg/ml. Besides, doripenem with the MIC90 of 0.5 µg/ml to Streptococcus pneumoniae possibly suggested its potential therapeutic effect regarding community-acquired pneumonia. Because of the heavy resistance burden in Taiwan, closely monitoring the evolutionary trend of carbapenem susceptibilities against clinically important pathogens is crucial in the future.
References
Jones RN, Sader HS, Fritsche TR (2005) Comparative activity of doripenem and three other carbapenems tested against Gram-negative bacilli with various beta-lactamase resistance mechanisms. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 52:71–74
Jean SS, Hsueh PR, Lee WS, Chang HT, Chou MY, Chen IS et al (2009) Nationwide surveillance of antimicrobial resistance among Enterobacteriaceae in intensive care units in Taiwan. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 28:215–220
Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) (2005) Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically—sixth edition: approved standard M7-A6. CLSI, Wayne, PA, USA
Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) (2005) Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing—fifteenth informational supplement: M100-S19. CLSI, Wayne, PA, USA
Fritsche TR, Stilwell MG, Jones RN (2005) Antimicrobial activity of doripenem (S-4661): a global surveillance report (2003). Clin Microbiol Infect 11:974–984
Jones RN, Huynh HK, Biedenbach DJ (2004) Activities of doripenem (S-4661) against drug-resistant clinical pathogens. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 48:3136–3140
Scheetz MH, Esterly JS, Malczynski M, Postelnick M, Qi C (2009) Impact of dissimilar susceptibility breakpoints for doripenem on susceptibility and carbapenem discordance for Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 64:465–467
Jean SS, Hsueh PR, Lee WS, Chang HT, Chou MY, Chen IS et al (2009) Nationwide surveillance of antimicrobial resistance among non-fermentative Gram-negative bacteria in intensive care units in Taiwan: SMART programme data 2005. Int J Antimicrob Agents 33:266–271
Brown SD, Traczewski MM (2005) Comparative in vitro antimicrobial activity of a new carbapenem, doripenem: tentative disc diffusion criteria and quality control. J Antimicrob Chemother 55:944–949
Davies TA, Shang W, Bush K, Flamm RK (2008) Activity of doripenem and comparator beta-lactams against US clinical isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae with defined mutations in the penicillin-binding domains of pbp1a, pbp2b and pbp2x. J Antimicrob Chemother 61:751–753
Funding
No funding sources.
Competing interests
None declared.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jean, SS., Hsueh, PR., Lee, WS. et al. In vitro activities of doripenem and other carbapenems against clinically important bacteria isolated in intensive care units: nationwide data from the SMART Programme. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 29, 471–475 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-009-0866-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-009-0866-6