Skip to main content
Log in

Distribution of Legionella pneumophila serogroups, monoclonal antibody subgroups and DNA sequence types in recent clinical and environmental isolates from England and Wales (2000–2008)

  • Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Clinical isolates of Legionella pneumophila, obtained from 167 patients, who acquired their illness in the community in England and Wales between January 2000 and March 2008, were compared with 276 environmental isolates of L. pneumophila obtained over the same period as part of the routine sampling of ‘managed’ water systems. The 443 isolates were typed by monoclonal antibody (mAb) subgrouping and the internationally standardised, seven-gene loci, sequence-based typing (SBT) scheme of the European Working Group for Legionella Infections (EWGLI). Of the clinical isolates, 97.6% were L. pneumophila serogroup (sgp) 1, compared with only 55.8% of environmental isolates (P = 0.0002); 91.6% were subgrouped as mAb3/1+ve, compared with only 8.3% of environmental isolates (P < 0.0001). The isolates were very diverse, with SBT identifying 111 sequence types (STs) (index of diversity [IOD] 0.954). Among the clinical isolates, 42 ST were seen, with one (ST47) accounting for 25.7% and three (ST47, ST37 and ST62) accounting for 46.1% of all isolates. Eighty-two STs were identified among the environmental isolates, with two (ST1 and ST79) accounting for 34.1% of these. Comparison of the STs seen among clinical and environmental isolates showed that there was very little overlap between the two populations (P < 0.0001), with common clinical strains found in the environment very infrequently: 0.4, 0.7 and 0% (ST47, ST37 and ST62, respectively), and common environmental strains rarely causing disease: 4.8 and 1.2% (ST1 and ST79, respectively). Combining phenotypic and genotypic data identified 144 phenons (IOD 0.970); 52 among clinical isolates and 101 among environmental isolates. The most abundant clinical strain, mAb ‘Allentown’ ST47, accounted for 22.8% of cases, but was only found once in the environment. Conversely, mAb ‘Oxford/OLDA’ ST1 was the most common environmental strain (17.0%), but only caused two infections. A review of the published data shows that mAb ‘Allentown’ ST47 is also an important cause of infection in France and possibly in the Netherlands. However, it was not found in a large study of German clinical isolates. This study confirms previous work showing that just a few strains of L. pneumophila cause the majority of community-acquired Legionella infection in England and Wales, and that these clinically significant strains are only rarely found in managed water systems. These data suggest that knowing which particular strain is present in an environment might be at least as important as knowing the quantity in which legionellae are present.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Regions are NUTS UK Level 1, see http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/ramon/nuts/pngmaps/eu1.png

References

  1. Perola O, Kauppinen J, Kusnetsov J, Kärkkäinen UM, Lück PC, Katila ML (2005) Persistent Legionella pneumophila colonization of a hospital water supply: efficacy of control methods and a molecular epidemiological analysis. APMIS 113:45–53. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0463.2005.apm1130107.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Joseph CA; European Working Group for Legionella Infections (2004) Legionnaires’ disease in Europe 2000–2002. Epidemiol Infect 132:417–424. doi:10.1017/S0950268804002018

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Harrison TG, Doshi N, Fry NK, Joseph CA (2007) Comparison of clinical and environmental isolates of Legionella pneumophila obtained in the UK over 19 years. Clin Microbiol Infect 13:78–85. doi:10.1111/j.1469-0691.2006.01558.x

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gaia V, Fry NK, Afshar B, Lück PC, Meugnier H, Etienne J, Peduzzi R, Harrison TG (2005) Consensus sequence-based scheme for epidemiological typing of clinical and environmental isolates of Legionella pneumophila. J Clin Microbiol 43:2047–2052. doi:10.1128/JCM.43.5.2047-2052.2005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ratzow S, Gaia V, Helbig JH, Fry NK, Lück PC (2007) Addition of neuA, the gene encoding N-acylneuraminate cytidylyl transferase, increases the discriminatory ability of the consensus sequence-based scheme for typing Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1 strains. J Clin Microbiol 45:1965–1968. doi:10.1128/JCM.00261-07

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Underwood AP, Bellamy W, Afshar B, Fry NK, Harrison TG (2006) Development of an online tool for the European Working Group for Legionella Infections sequence-based typing, including automatic quality assessment and data submission. In: Cianciotto NP, Abu Kwaik Y, Edelstein PH, Fields BS, Geary DF, Harrison TG, Joseph CA, Ratcliff RM, Stout JE, Swanson MS (eds) Legionella: state of the art 30 years after its recognition, Chapter 44. ASM Press, Washington, pp 250–252

    Google Scholar 

  7. Joseph CA, Harrison TG, Ilijic-Car D, Bartlett CLR (1999) Legionnaires’ disease in residents of England and Wales: 1998. Commun Dis Public Health 2:280–284

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Harrison TG (2005) Legionella. In: Borriello SP, Murrray PR, Funke G (eds) Topley and Wilson’s microbiology and microbial infections. Hodder Arnold, London, pp 1761–1785

    Google Scholar 

  9. Harrison TG, Taylor AG (1988) Phenotypic characteristics of legionellae. In: Harrison TG, Taylor AG (eds) A laboratory manual for legionella. Wiley, Chichester, pp 45–56

    Google Scholar 

  10. Helbig JH, Bernander S, Castellani Pastoris M, Etienne J, Gaia V, Lauwers S, Lindsay D, Lück PC, Marques T, Mentula S, Peeters MF, Pelaz C, Struelens M, Uldum SA, Wewalka G, Harrison TG (2002) Pan-European study on culture-proven Legionnaires’ disease: distribution of Legionella pneumophila serogroups and monoclonal subgroups. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 21:710–716. doi:10.1007/s10096-002-0820-3

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Saunders NA, Harrison TG (1988) The application of nucleic acid probes and monoclonal antibodies to the investigation of legionella infections. In: Harrison TG, Taylor AG (eds) A laboratory manual for legionella. Wiley, Chichester, pp 137–153

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hunter PR, Gaston MA (1988) Numerical index of the discriminatory ability of typing systems: an application of Simpson’s index of diversity. J Clin Microbiol 26:2465–2466

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Simpson EH (1949) Measurement of diversity. Nature 163:688. doi:10.1038/163688a0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Watkins ID, Tobin JO, Dennis PJ, Brown W, Newnham R, Kurtz JB (1985) Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1 subgrouping by monoclonal antibodies—an epidemiological tool. J Hyg (Lond) 95:211–216

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Dournon E, Bibb WF, Rajagopalan P, Desplaces N, McKinney RM (1988) Monoclonal antibody reactivity as a virulence marker for Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1 strains. J Infect Dis 157:496–501

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Doleans A, Aurell H, Reyrolle M, lina G, Freney J, Vandenesch F, Etienne J, Jarraud S (2004) Clinical and environmental distributions of Legionella strains in France are different. J Clin Microbiol 42:458–460. doi:10.1128/JCM.42.1.458-460.2004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Borchardt J, Helbig JH, Lück PC (2008) Occurrence and distribution of sequence types among Legionella pneumophila strains isolated from patients in Germany: common features and differences to other regions of the world. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 27:29–36. doi:10.1007/s10096-007-0392-3

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Harrison TG, Saunders NA, Haththotuwa A, Hallas G, Birtles RJ, Taylor AG (1990) Phenotypic variation amongst genotypically homogeneous Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1 isolates: implications for the investigation of outbreaks of Legionnaires’ disease. Epidemiol Infect 104:171–180

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Hunt DA, Cartwright KA, Smith MC, Middleton J, Bartlett CL, Lee JV, Dennis PJ, Harper D (1991) An outbreak of Legionnaires’ disease in Gloucester. Epidemiol Infect 107:133–141

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Health and Safety Commission (2000) Legionnaires’ disease. The control of legionella bacteria in water systems. Approved Code of Practice and Guidance L8, 3rd Edition. Sudbury, HSE Books. ISBN 0-7176-1772-6

  21. Fry NK, Alexiou-Daniel S, Bangsborg JM, Bernander S, Castellani Pastoris M, Etienne J, Forsblom B, Gaia V, Helbig JHP, Lück PC, Lindsay D, Pelaz C, Uldum SA, Harrison TG (1999) A multicenter evaluation of genotypic methods for the epidemiologic typing of Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1: results of a pan-European study. Clin Microbiol Infect 5:462–477. doi:10.1111/j.1469-0691.1999.tb00176.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ginevra C, Forey F, Campèse C, Reyrolle M, Che D, Etienne J, Jarraud S (2008) Lorraine strain of Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1, France. Emerg Infect Dis 14:673–675

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Den Boer JW, Bruin JP, Verhoef LP, Van der Zwaluw K, Jansen R, Yzerman EP (2008) Genotypic comparison of clinical Legionella isolates and patient-related environmental isolates in The Netherlands, 2002–2006. Clin Microbiol Infect 14:459–466. doi:10.1111/j.1469-0691.2008.01973.x

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Fry NK, Bangsborg JM, Bergmans A, Bernander S, Etienne J, Franzin L, Gaia V, Hasenberger P, Baladrón Jiménez B, Jonas D, Lindsay D, Mentula S, Papoutsi A, Struelens M, Uldum SA, Visca P, Wannet W, Harrison TG (2002) Designation of the European Working Group on Legionella Infection (EWGLI) amplified fragment length polymorphism types of Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1 and results of intercentre proficiency testing using a standard protocol. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 21:722–728. doi:10.1007/s10096-002-0790-5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Paul McDermott (Health and Safety Executive) for his enthusiastic support and helpful discussions throughout the project. We are particularly indebted to Greg Davies (EMS), Mark Hichens (GR Micro), Gary Hogben (Feedwater) and the staff of HPA FWE Laboratories for generously providing the environmental isolates and water-testing data; to all our microbiologist colleagues in England and Wales for the clinical samples/isolates; to Jürgen Helbig who made the ‘Dresden panel’ mAbs available to us; to Eve Arnold (HPA Statistics, Modelling and Bioinformatics Department) who provided statistical advice and figures; and to Chantal Palepou, Teresa Stocki and Falguni Naik from the Respiratory and Systemic Infection Department for their technical help and for retrieving the epidemiological data. This study was part-funded by a grant from the Health and Safety Executive (JN3084). Preliminary data from this study were presented at the 24th Annual Meeting of the European Working Group for Legionella Infections (Madrid, Spain, May 2008).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. G. Harrison.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Harrison, T.G., Afshar, B., Doshi, N. et al. Distribution of Legionella pneumophila serogroups, monoclonal antibody subgroups and DNA sequence types in recent clinical and environmental isolates from England and Wales (2000–2008). Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 28, 781–791 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-009-0705-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-009-0705-9

Keywords

Navigation