Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Prospective controlled study of the diagnostic value of skin biopsy in patients with presumed meningococcal disease

  • Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Microbiological tests for diagnosis of acute meningococcal disease are important for the clinical management of patients with this often-fatal illness, but cultures are frequently negative after antibiotics have been administered. Retrospective studies suggest that examination of skin biopsies may aid a rapid diagnosis and that cultures of skin biopsies are often positive even after antimicrobial treatment has commenced. This prospective controlled study aimed to assess the diagnostic value of skin biopsy compared with investigations of blood and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in patients with skin lesions and presumed meningococcal disease. A total of 43 patients, 31 with suspected acute meningococcal infection and 12 controls, were included. All skin biopsies were investigated by Gram stain and routine microbiological culture. In 25 patients, meningococcal infection was diagnosed microbiologically. The clinical diagnosis was meningococcal meningitis in 8 patients, meningococcal sepsis in 11 patients, and a combination of both in 6 patients. The sensitivity of cultures of blood, CSF, and skin biopsies was 56%, 50%, and 36%, respectively. When culture and Gram stain were combined, positive results were obtained in 56%, 64%, and 56%, respectively. There was no correlation between the diagnostic yield of skin biopsies and previous antibiotic treatment. In 14 patients, the diagnosis was based exclusively on one positive sample: CSF in 7 (28%) patients, blood in 4 (16%) patients, and skin biopsy in 3 (12%) patients. The sensitivity of skin biopsies was highest in patients with the least extensive skin lesions. Specificity was 100%. Microbiological investigation of skin biopsies increased the diagnostic yield and could be considered a component of the routine diagnostic work-up in patients with suspected meningococcal infection, even after the initiation of antimicrobial treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. van Deuren M, Brandtzaeg P, van der Meer JW (2000) Update on meningococcal disease with emphasis on pathogenesis and clinical management. Clin Microbiol Rev 13:144–166

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. van de Beek D, de Gans J, McIntyre P, Prasad K (2004) Steroids in adults with acute bacterial meningitis: a systematic review. Lancet Infect Dis 4:139–143

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Nadel S, Britto J, Booy R, Maconochie I, Habibi P, Levin M (1998) Avoidable deficiencies in the delivery of health care to children with meningococcal disease. J Accid Emerg Med 15:298–303

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rosenstein NE, Perkins BA, Stephens DS, Popovic T, Hughes JM (2001) Meningococcal disease. N Engl J Med 344:1378–1388

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Netherlands Reference Laboratory for Bacterial Meningitis (2005) Bacterial meningitis in the Netherlands, annual report 2004. Netherlands Reference Laboratory for Bacterial Meningitis (AMC/RIVM), University of Amsterdam

  6. van Deuren M, van Dijke BJ, Koopman RJ, Horrevorts AM, Meis JF, Santman FW, van der Meer JW (1993) Rapid diagnosis of acute meningococcal infections by needle aspiration or biopsy of skin lesions. BMJ 306:1229–1232

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Periappuram M, Taylor MR, Keane CT (1995) Rapid detection of meningococci from petechiae in acute meningococcal infection. J Infect 31:201–203

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Netter A, Salanier M (1917) The presence of meningococci in the purpuric elements of meningococcal infection. Br J Child Dis 14:101–104

    Google Scholar 

  9. Harrison OB, Robertson BD, Faust SN, Jepson MA, Goldin RD, Levin M, Heyderman RS (2002) Analysis of pathogen–host cell interactions in purpura fulminans: expression of capsule, type IV pili, and PorA by Neisseria meningitidis in vivo. Infect Immun 70:5193–5201

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Texereau M, Roblot P, Dumars A, Grignon B, Becq-Giraudon B (1997) The usefulness of skin culture in the diagnosis of chronic meningococcaemia. J Intern Med 242:519–520

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kesanopoulos K, Tzanakaki G, Levidiotou S, Blackwell C, Kremastinou J (2005) Evaluation of touch-down real-time PCR based on SYBR Green I fluorescent dye for the detection of Neisseria meningitidis in clinical samples. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 43:419–424

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Guarner J, Greer PW, Whitney A, Shieh WJ, Fischer M, White EH, Carlone GM, Stephens DS, Popovic T, Zaki SR (2004) Pathogenesis and diagnosis of human meningococcal disease using immunohistochemical and PCR assays. Am J Clin Pathol 122:754–764

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. J. Kuijper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Arend, S.M., Lavrijsen, A.P.M., Kuijken, I. et al. Prospective controlled study of the diagnostic value of skin biopsy in patients with presumed meningococcal disease. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 25, 643–649 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-006-0199-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-006-0199-7

Keywords

Navigation