Abstract
In the study reported here, the diagnostic performance of two new rapid tests for the diagnosis of malaria was evaluated in symptomatic patients in a non-endemic area. Of 557 consecutive patients, 109 (19.6%) had documented malaria. For the NOW ICT MALARIA P.f./P.v. (Binax, Portland, ME, USA) and OptiMAL IT (Diamed, Cressier, Switzerland) tests, respectively, sensitivity values were 96.3% and 79.8% (P-value, 0.0001), and specificity values were 98.8% and 98.4%. The NOW ICT test did not detect two of 80 Plasmodium falciparum infections, and it generated false-positive results for five patients. The OptiMAL IT test failed to detect ten of the P. falciparum infections, and it generated seven false-positive results. The results suggest that these rapid diagnostic tests for malaria may be useful, but they cannot replace microscopic examination of blood films.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Moody A (2002) Rapid diagnostic tests for malaria parasites. Clin Microbiol Rev 15:66–78
Beadle C, Long GW, Weiss WR et al (1994) Diagnosis of malaria by detection of Plasmodium falciparum HRP-2 antigen with a rapid dipstick antigen-capture assay. Lancet 343:564–568
Peyron F, Martet G, Vigier JP (1994) Dipstick antigen-capture assay for malaria detection. Lancet 343:1502–1503
Tjitra E, Suprianto S, Dyer M, Currie BJ, Anstey NM (1999) Field evaluation of the ICT malaria P.f/P.v immunochromatographic test for detection of Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax in patients with a presumptive clinical diagnosis of malaria in eastern Indonesia. J Clin Microbiol 37:2412–2417
Moody AH, Chiodini PL (2002) Non-microscopic method for malaria diagnosis using OptiMAL®IT, a second generation dipstick for malaria pLDH antigen detection. Br J Biomed Sci 59:228–231
Jelinek T, Grobusch MP, Nothdurft HD (2000) Use of dipstick tests for the rapid diagnosis of malaria in nonimmune travelers. J Travel Med 7:175–179
De Montbrison F, Angei C, Staal A, Kaiser K, Picot S (2003) Simultaneous detection and quantification of P. falciparum in human blood samples by real time PCR. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 97:387–390
Pieroni P, Mills CD, Ohrt C, Harrington MA, Kain KC (1998) Comparison of the ParaSightTM-F test and the ICT MalariaPfTM test with the polymerase chain reaction for the diagnosis of Plasmodium falciparum malaria in travellers. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 92:166–169
Eisen DP, Saul A (2000) Disappearance of pan-malarial antigen reactivity using the ICT Malaria P.f/P.vTM kit parallels decline of patent parasitaemia shown by microscopy. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 94:169–170
Piper R, Lebras J, Wentworth L et al (1999) Immuocapture diagnostic assays for malaria using plasmodium lactate dehydrogenase. Am J Trop Med Hyg 60:109–118
Moody A, Hunt-Cooke A, Gabbett E, Chiodini P (2000) Performance of the OptiMAL malaria antigen capture dipstick for malaria diagnosis and treatment monitoring at the Hospital for Tropical Diseases, London. Br J Haematol 109:891–894
Playford EG, Walker J (2002) Evaluation of the ICT Malaria P.f/P.v. and the OptiMAL rapid diagnostic tests for malaria in febrile returned travellers. J Clin Microbiol 40:4166–4171
Palmer CJ, Lindo JF, Klaskala WI et al (1998) Evaluation of the OptiMAL test for rapid diagnosis of Plasmodium vivax and Plasmodium falciparum malaria. J Clin Microbiol 36:203–206
Acknowledgements
We thank Laboratoires Fumouze (Levallois Perret, France) for providing the NOW ICT MALARIA P.f./P.v. reagents and Laboratoires Diamed (Cressier, Switzerland) for the OptiMAL IT reagents. All experiments conducted in the study comply with the current laws of France.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
De Monbrison, F., Gérome, P., Chaulet, J.F. et al. Comparative diagnostic performance of two commercial rapid tests for malaria in a non-endemic area. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 23, 784–786 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-004-1202-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-004-1202-9