Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative diagnostic performance of two commercial rapid tests for malaria in a non-endemic area

  • Concise Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the study reported here, the diagnostic performance of two new rapid tests for the diagnosis of malaria was evaluated in symptomatic patients in a non-endemic area. Of 557 consecutive patients, 109 (19.6%) had documented malaria. For the NOW ICT MALARIA P.f./P.v. (Binax, Portland, ME, USA) and OptiMAL IT (Diamed, Cressier, Switzerland) tests, respectively, sensitivity values were 96.3% and 79.8% (P-value, 0.0001), and specificity values were 98.8% and 98.4%. The NOW ICT test did not detect two of 80 Plasmodium falciparum infections, and it generated false-positive results for five patients. The OptiMAL IT test failed to detect ten of the P. falciparum infections, and it generated seven false-positive results. The results suggest that these rapid diagnostic tests for malaria may be useful, but they cannot replace microscopic examination of blood films.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Moody A (2002) Rapid diagnostic tests for malaria parasites. Clin Microbiol Rev 15:66–78

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Beadle C, Long GW, Weiss WR et al (1994) Diagnosis of malaria by detection of Plasmodium falciparum HRP-2 antigen with a rapid dipstick antigen-capture assay. Lancet 343:564–568

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Peyron F, Martet G, Vigier JP (1994) Dipstick antigen-capture assay for malaria detection. Lancet 343:1502–1503

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Tjitra E, Suprianto S, Dyer M, Currie BJ, Anstey NM (1999) Field evaluation of the ICT malaria P.f/P.v immunochromatographic test for detection of Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax in patients with a presumptive clinical diagnosis of malaria in eastern Indonesia. J Clin Microbiol 37:2412–2417

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Moody AH, Chiodini PL (2002) Non-microscopic method for malaria diagnosis using OptiMAL®IT, a second generation dipstick for malaria pLDH antigen detection. Br J Biomed Sci 59:228–231

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Jelinek T, Grobusch MP, Nothdurft HD (2000) Use of dipstick tests for the rapid diagnosis of malaria in nonimmune travelers. J Travel Med 7:175–179

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. De Montbrison F, Angei C, Staal A, Kaiser K, Picot S (2003) Simultaneous detection and quantification of P. falciparum in human blood samples by real time PCR. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 97:387–390

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Pieroni P, Mills CD, Ohrt C, Harrington MA, Kain KC (1998) Comparison of the ParaSightTM-F test and the ICT MalariaPfTM test with the polymerase chain reaction for the diagnosis of Plasmodium falciparum malaria in travellers. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 92:166–169

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Eisen DP, Saul A (2000) Disappearance of pan-malarial antigen reactivity using the ICT Malaria P.f/P.vTM kit parallels decline of patent parasitaemia shown by microscopy. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 94:169–170

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Piper R, Lebras J, Wentworth L et al (1999) Immuocapture diagnostic assays for malaria using plasmodium lactate dehydrogenase. Am J Trop Med Hyg 60:109–118

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Moody A, Hunt-Cooke A, Gabbett E, Chiodini P (2000) Performance of the OptiMAL malaria antigen capture dipstick for malaria diagnosis and treatment monitoring at the Hospital for Tropical Diseases, London. Br J Haematol 109:891–894

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Playford EG, Walker J (2002) Evaluation of the ICT Malaria P.f/P.v. and the OptiMAL rapid diagnostic tests for malaria in febrile returned travellers. J Clin Microbiol 40:4166–4171

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Palmer CJ, Lindo JF, Klaskala WI et al (1998) Evaluation of the OptiMAL test for rapid diagnosis of Plasmodium vivax and Plasmodium falciparum malaria. J Clin Microbiol 36:203–206

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Laboratoires Fumouze (Levallois Perret, France) for providing the NOW ICT MALARIA P.f./P.v. reagents and Laboratoires Diamed (Cressier, Switzerland) for the OptiMAL IT reagents. All experiments conducted in the study comply with the current laws of France.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. Peyron.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

De Monbrison, F., Gérome, P., Chaulet, J.F. et al. Comparative diagnostic performance of two commercial rapid tests for malaria in a non-endemic area. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 23, 784–786 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-004-1202-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-004-1202-9

Keywords

Navigation