Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The investigation of the gait parameter alterations in response to levodopa therapy and tap test in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neurological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To investigate the impact of dopamine oral therapy, the effect of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) tap test on gait parameters in our idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) subjects.

Methods

Patients with a possible diagnosis of iNPH who had been admitted to our outpatient polyclinic between March 2022 and May 2022 were enrolled. In addition to the clinical evaluations, basal gait analysis was performed using a “Gait Analyzer” program which was uploaded to a mobile phone. Thereafter, the gait analyses were re-evaluated after levodopa therapy, 4 h and 2 weeks after the CSF tap test at distinct times, separately.

Results

Ultimately, the data of 8 patients with iNPH were enrolled in this study (mean age = 67.37 ± 7.74, F/M = 3/5). Friedman’s analysis of variance analyses did not show a difference in any parameters of gait between the distinct evaluation times. On the other hand, the pairwise analysis results showed that the step time and cadence had improved after levodopa therapy, whereas no significant improvement was detected in any of the parameters after the CSF tap test.

Conclusion

In our pilot study, we found that the gait parameters improved after levodopa therapy. However, the gait parameters did not change after the CSF tap test which may suggest that our measurement method might overlook detecting the gait disturbance specific to the iNPH. Future research to develop new evaluation methods and questionnaires detecting the gait disturbance specific to the iNPH pathophysiology may provide substantial clinical applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

SMMT:

Standardized Mini-Mental State Examination

MDS-UPDRS:

MDS-Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale

FP-CIT:

SPECT with [123I]-N-ω-fluoropropyl-2β-carbomethoxy-3β-(4 iodophenyl) nortropane

References

  1. Hakim S, Adams RD (1965) The special clinical problem of symptomatic hydrocephalus with normal cerebrospinal fluid pressure Observations on cerebrospinal fluid hydrodynamics. J Neurol Sci 2(4):307–327

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Broggi M, Redaelli V, Tringali G, Restelli F, Romito L, Schiavolin S, Tagliavini F, Broggi G (2016) Normal pressure hydrocephalus and parkinsonism: preliminary data on neurosurgical and neurological treatment. World Neurosurg 90:348–356

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Wang Z, Zhang Y, Hu F, Ding J, Wang X (2020) Pathogenesis and pathophysiology of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. CNS Neurosci Ther 26(12):1230–1240

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Kang K, Jeon JS, Kim T, Choi D, Ko PW, Hwang SK, Lee HW (2016) Asymmetric and upper body parkinsonism in patients with idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus. J Clin Neurol 12(4):452–459

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Lee JY, Park SB, Lee M, Ju H, Im K, Kwon KY (2020) Detailed visual assessment of striatal dopaminergic depletion in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: unremarkable or not? BMC Neurol 20(1):277

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Pozzi NG, Brumberg J, Todisco M, Minafra B, Zangaglia R, Bossert I, Trifiro G, Ceravolo R, Vitali P, Isaias IU, Fasano A, Pacchetti C (2021) Striatal dopamine deficit and motor impairment in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Mov Disord 36(1):124–132

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Todisco M, Zangaglia R, Minafra B, Pisano P, Trifiro G, Bossert I, Pozzi NG, Brumberg J, Ceravolo R, Isaias IU, Fasano A, Pacchetti C (2021) Clinical outcome and striatal dopaminergic function after shunt surgery in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Neurology 96(23):e2861–e2873

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Del Gamba C, Bruno A, Frosini D, Volterrani D, Migaleddu G, Benedetto N, Perrini P, Pacchetti C, Cosottini M, Bonuccelli U, Ceravolo R (2021) Is DAT imaging abnormality in normal pressure hydrocephalus always suggestive of degeneration? Neurol Sci 42(2):723–726

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lim TS, Yong SW, Moon SY (2009) Repetitive lumbar punctures as treatment for normal pressure hydrocephalus. Eur Neurol 62(5):293–297

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rossi PD, Damanti S, Nani C, Pluderi M, Bertani G, Mari D, Cesari M, Consonni D, Spagnoli D (2019) Repeated cerebrospinal fluid removal procedure in older patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus ineligible for surgical treatment. J Am Med Dir Assoc 20(3):373-376 e3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Onder H (2022) The sustained improvement after lumbar puncture in an idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus subject with synucleinopathy. Neurol Sci 43(2):1471–1473

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Isik AT, Kaya D, AtesBulut E, Dokuzlar O, Soysal P (2019) The outcomes of serial cerebrospinal fluid removal in elderly patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Clin Interv Aging 14:2063–2069

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Han SW, Park YH, Ryoo N, Kim K, Pyun JM, Kim S (2021) Pearls & oysters: idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus with synucleinopathy: diagnosis and treatment. Neurology 97(4):196–199

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Stolze H, Kuhtz-Buschbeck JP, Drucke H, Johnk K, Diercks C, Palmie S, Mehdorn HM, Illert M, Deuschl G (2000) Gait analysis in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus–which parameters respond to the CSF tap test? Clin Neurophysiol 111(9):1678–1686

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Relkin N, Marmarou A, Klinge P, Bergsneider M, Black PM (2005) Diagnosing idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery 57(3):S4-16 (discussion ii-v)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Nakajima M, Yamada S, Miyajima M, Ishii K, Kuriyama N, Kazui H, Kanemoto H, Suehiro T, Yoshiyama K, Kameda M, Kajimoto Y, Mase M, Murai H, Kita D, Kimura T, Samejima N, Tokuda T, Kaijima M, Akiba C, Kawamura K, Atsuchi M, Hirata Y, Matsumae M, Sasaki M, Yamashita F, Aoki S, Irie R, Miyake H, Kato T, Mori E, Ishikawa M, Date I, Arai H, research committee of idiopathic normal pressure (2021) Guidelines for Management of Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus (Third Edition): Endorsed by the Japanese Society of Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus. Neurol Med Chir Tokyo 61(2):63–97

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Yamada S, Ishikawa M, Miyajima M, Nakajima M, Atsuchi M, Kimura T, Tokuda T, Kazui H, Mori E (2017) Timed up and go test at tap test and shunt surgery in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Neurol Clin Pract 7(2):98–108

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Kuntapun J, Silsupadol P, Kamnardsiri T, Lugade V (2020) Smartphone monitoring of gait and balance during irregular surface walking and obstacle crossing. Front Sports Act Living 2:560577

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Cankaya D, Akti S, Unal SB, Sezgin EA (2021) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty results in a better gait pattern than total knee arthroplasty: gait analysis with a smartphone application. Jt Dis Relat Surg 32(1):22–27

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Allali G, Laidet M, Armand S, Momjian S, Marques B, Saj A, Assal F (2017) A combined cognitive and gait quantification to identify normal pressure hydrocephalus from its mimics: the Geneva’s protocol. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 160:5–11

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Czerwosz L, Szczepek E, Blaszczyk JW, Sokolowska B, Dmitruk K, Dudzinski K, Jurkiewicz J, Czernicki Z (2009) Analysis of postural sway in patients with normal pressure hydrocephalus: effects of shunt implantation. Eur J Med Res 14(Suppl 4):53–58

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Nikaido Y, Akisue T, Kajimoto Y, Tucker A, Kawami Y, Urakami H, Iwai Y, Sato H, Nishiguchi T, Hinoshita T, Kuroda K, Ohno H, Saura R (2018) Postural instability differences between idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus and Parkinson’s disease. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 165:103–107

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Abram K, Bohne S, Bublak P, Karvouniari P, Klingner CM, Witte OW, Guntinas-Lichius O, Axer H (2016) The effect of spinal tap test on different sensory modalities of postural stability in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Dement Geriatr Cogn Dis Extra 6(3):447–457

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Allali G, Garibotto V, Mainta IC, Nicastro N, Assal F (2018) Dopaminergic imaging separates normal pressure hydrocephalus from its mimics. J Neurol 265(10):2434–2441

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Morishita T, Foote KD, Okun MS (2010) INPH and Parkinson disease: differentiation by levodopa response. Nat Rev Neurol 6(1):52–56

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. O’Sullivan JD, Said CM, Dillon LC, Hoffman M, Hughes AJ (1998) Gait analysis in patients with Parkinson’s disease and motor fluctuations: influence of levodopa and comparison with other measures of motor function. Mov Disord 13(6):900–906

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Shan DE, Lee SJ, Chao LY, Yeh SI (2001) Gait analysis in advanced Parkinson’s disease–effect of levodopa and tolcapone. Can J Neurol Sci 28(1):70–75

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Concept: S. C., H. O. Design: H. O., S. C. Supervision: H. O., S. C. Materials: H. O., U. P. Data collection and/or processing: H. O., U. P. Analysis and/or interpretation: H. O., U. P., S. C. Literature search: H. O., U. P. Writing manuscript: H. O. Critical review: H. O., S. C.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Halil Onder.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

Ethical approval has been obtained from the local committee of the Diskapi Yildirim Beyazit Training and Research Hospital.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Informed consent

Informed consent form has been obtained from the patient.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Onder, H., Poyraz, U. & Comoglu, S. The investigation of the gait parameter alterations in response to levodopa therapy and tap test in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Neurol Sci 43, 6813–6820 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-022-06361-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-022-06361-9

Keywords

Navigation